1 / 26

香港家庭計劃指導會 The Family Planning Association of Hong Kong

二零零七年香港家庭計劃 知識、態度及實行 調查報告 Report on the Survey of Family Planning Knowledge, Attitude and Practice in Hong Kong 2007. 香港家庭計劃指導會 The Family Planning Association of Hong Kong. B ackground and Objectives.

anika-valencia
Download Presentation

香港家庭計劃指導會 The Family Planning Association of Hong Kong

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 二零零七年香港家庭計劃 知識、態度及實行 調查報告 Report on the Survey of Family Planning Knowledge, Attitude and Practice in Hong Kong 2007 香港家庭計劃指導會 The Family Planning Association of Hong Kong

  2. Background and Objectives • A series of survey conducted every 5 years since 1967, and the 2007 survey is the ninth in the series • Questions were designed primarily based on those in previous surveys for the purpose of trend analysis • Objectives • To evaluate the progress of family planning movement and fertility level in Hong Kong • To study ineffective contraceptive usage and contraceptive failure, unplanned pregnancy and induced abortion

  3. Methodology • Household was used as the sampling unit • A sample of households was systematically drawn by the Census and Statistics Department using random sampling method • One eligible woman (currently married or cohabitated and aged between 15-49) and her spouse were randomly selected in each household visited • A pilot survey was conducted prior to the main survey • Respondents were anonymous

  4. The Nielsen Company conducted interviews by home visits during December 2007 and April 2008 • 1,510 women and 770 of their spouses were successfully interviewed • Female response rate: 66% • 71% in 1992 • 70% in 1997 • 73% in 2002 • Male response rate: 51%* • 58%* in 1997 • 71%* in 2002 * The number of successfully interviewed women is used as the base of the male response rate

  5. 29.7 25.2 22.4 14.1 7.2 1.4 Female Male Age Distribution of Respondents Mean age of female respondents = 39.7 years Nf2007 = 1,510 % 25-29 35-39 40-44 45-49 Below 25 30-34 Year of age Mean age of male respondents = 43.7 years Nm2007 = 770 % 25-29 35-39 40-44 45-49 50 and above Below 25 30-34 Year of age

  6. Distribution by Education Attainment Female Nf1992 = 1,681 Nf1997 = 1,511 Nf2002 = 1,607 Nf2007 = 1,510 % Male Nm1997 = 871 Nm2002 = 1,147 Nm2007 = 770 Primary school Post-secondary education or above No schooling Secondary school Education attainment Base：All respondents

  7. Distribution by Household Income % $0- $3,999 $4,000- $5,999 $6,000- $7,999 $10,000- $14,999 $15,000- $19,999 $20,000- $29,999 $30,000- $39,999 $8,000- $9,999 $40,000 or above Monthly household income All female respondents: 1,510 Average monthly household income: about $23,637

  8. Distribution of Women by Parity % 0 1 2 3 4 5 or above Parity (Number of children) Base: All female respondents（2007: 1,510， 2002: 1,607， 1997: 1,511， 1992: 1,681）

  9. Distribution of Women by Ideal Parity % 0 1 2 3 4 5 or above Ideal parity (Ideal number of children) Base: All female respondents（2007: 1,510， 2002: 1,607， 1997: 1,511， 1992: 1,681）

  10. Ideal parity 2.4 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.6 3.3 3 2.6 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.6 1.5 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Actual and Ideal Parities Parity Year Base:（ 2,270 1,550 1,403 1,511 1,681 1,511 1,607 1,510） All female respondents

  11. Comparison of Actual and Ideal Parities % Actual parity < Ideal parity Actual parity = Ideal parity Actual parity > Ideal parity Base: 1,210 (excluding those women who were infertile by birth or accidents and those who have no ideal parity)

  12. Women Desiring to Have Children (Again) % Don’t know / Never thought about it Yes No Not decided yet Base: 2007: 1,424, 2002: 1,294, 1997: 1,152, 1992: 1,194, 1987:1,062 (excluding those women who were infertile by birth or accidents)

  13. Female Male Reasons for Desiring to Have Children (Again) % % I like children Let children have company Children can bring joy to life To carry on the family line I wouldn’t be lonely in my old age My husband wants to have children Children are the fruits of our love I like to have a big family Giving birth is a women’s natural duty My parents want to have grandchildren To maintain marriage Financial support from children in my old age Female Male Base: All respondents who were fertile and desired to have children (again) （Female: 183, Male: 115）

  14. Female Male Reasons for Not Wanting to Have Children (Again) % % Already have enough children Financial burden of raising children is heavy Too old Too much responsibility for raising children Too busy at work Fear children would be corrupted by bad social values Hope to give every child as much education as possible Accommodation is a problem with too many Children Female Male Base: Those respondents who were fertile but did not want to have children (again) （Female: 1,157, Male: 543）

  15. Discussion with Spouse on Parity % Have discussed with spouse Female Male Respondents who were still fertile and knew whether they want to have children (again) or not （2002: Husband 911, Wife 911 2007: husband 730, Wife 728） Enough discussion? Opinion same with spouse’s? % % Yes Yes Base: Respondents who said they had discussed with their spouse on parity （2002: Husband 591, Wife 597 2007: Husband 466, Wife 482）

  16. Female Use of Contraceptives and Satisfaction Ever used 83.0 35.5 19.9 16.8 16.6 11.1 10.0 4.2 2.1 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.7 Never used 17.0 64.5 80.1 83.2 83.4 88.9 90.0 95.8 97.9 98.7 98.9 99.1 99.2 99.3 Satisfied Dissatisfied Male condom Oral pills Rhythm (Safety period) Withdrawal Intra-uterine device Female sterilization Contraceptive injection Emergency contraceptive pills Abstinence Female condom Contraceptive patch Diaphragm External contraceptives (e.g. foaming tablet) Male sterilization % % % Base: Excluding those who were infertile by birth (Female: 1,508）

  17. Principal Contraceptive Methods Currently Used 2002 2007 1992 1997 1982 1987 % % % % % % Male condom Diaphragm Female sterilization Oral pills Rhythm (Safety period) Withdrawal Contraceptive injection Male sterilization Diaphragm / External contraceptives e.g. foaming tablet 1,015 1,221 1,314 1,187 1,336 1,078 Base: Female respondents who were fertile by birth and practised contraception

  18. Attitude towards Responsibility in Family Planning Whose responsibility? Female % Both Husband’s Wife’s Neither husband nor wife’s Whose responsibility? Male % Both Husband’s Wife’s Neither husband nor wife’s

  19. Reasons for Not Practising / Discontinuing Contraception Age Distribution (%) % Don’t think I will get pregnant Don’t care Afraid of side effects Contraception is very inconvenient Think I won’t get pregnant （44 respondents） Contraceptive out of stock Partner’s objection Want to have a baby Have sexual intercourse during safety period Not care（23 respondents） Base: Female respondents who were born fertile and did not practise contraception (119）

  20. Induced Abortion % None 1 3 4 or above 2 Number of induced abortions ever had Proportions of female respondents who ever had induced abortion - 2007: 20.8%, 2002: 26.3%, 1997: 25.4%, 1992: 22.8% Base: All female respondents who were born fertile （1,437）

  21. 61.5 11.9 8.8 8.4 4.0 2.7 1.8 Contraceptive Method Used Before Induced Abortion Distribution of women by contraceptive method used before induced abortion - (Including those who practised contraception and those who got pregnant in an occasion where a contraceptive method wasn’t used - 226 respondents in total） % Whether practised contraception before induced abortion? Male condom (52.1) Oral pills (18.9) Yes 50.5% N=226 Got pregnant in an occasion where a contraceptive method wasn’t used 22.2% Intra-uterine device (7.0) No 27.3% Rhythm (Safety period) (11.9) Withdrawal (5.2) Contraceptive injection (2.4) (0.0) Female sterilization （）data from 2002 Base: Femalerespondents who ever had induced abortion（311）

  22. Place of Induced Abortion % Illegally in Hong Kong Hospitals in Hong Kong Mainland China FPAHK Distribution of female respondents who ever had induced abortion by the place of last induced abortion Base: Female respondents who were born fertile and ever had induced abortion （2007: 311； 2002: 422；1997: 384；1992: 382）

  23. Place of Induced Abortion (Including Hong Kong residents only） % Hospitals in Hong Kong Mainland China Illegally in Hong Kong FPAHK Distribution of female respondents who ever had induced abortion by the place of lastinduced abortion Base: Including female respondents who were Hong Kong residents at the time of last induced abortion （105）

  24. Reasons for Last Induced Abortions % Financial burden Already have enough children Not mentally prepared for having children Not yet a suitable time to have children Health problem My character is not suitable for parenthood Unstable social & economical environment Base: Female respondents who ever had induced abortion （2007: 311）

  25. Decision Making on Last Induced Abortion % Myself Baby’s father Doctor My parents Distribution of women by decision maker of last induced abortion Base: Female respondents who ever had induced abortion （ 2007: 311 ）

  26. Feeling After Induced Abortion % Guilty No difference Relieved Sad Base: Female respondents who ever had induced abortion （2007: 311）

More Related