distributed robotic teams l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Distributed Robotic Teams PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Distributed Robotic Teams

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 29

Distributed Robotic Teams - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 372 Views
  • Uploaded on

Distributed Robotic Teams. Nikos Papanikolopoulos Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering Digital Technology Center University of Minnesota npapas@cs.umn.edu. AI, Robotics, and Computer Vision Laboratory, CSE, UMN . Faculty

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Distributed Robotic Teams' - andrew


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
distributed robotic teams
Distributed Robotic Teams

Nikos Papanikolopoulos

Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Digital Technology Center

University of Minnesota

npapas@cs.umn.edu

ai robotics and computer vision laboratory cse umn
AI, Robotics, and Computer Vision Laboratory, CSE, UMN
  • Faculty

Maria Gini (Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, Intelligent Agents)

Nikos Papanikolopoulos (Robotics, Computer Vision, Transportation Systems)

Stergios Roumeliotis (Robotics, Robot Localization and Mapping)

Rich Voyles (Robotics, Computer Vision, Multi- Agents)

Paul Schrater (Computer Vision, Pattern Recognition, Haptic Interfaces)

ai robotics and computer vision laboratory cse umn3
AI, Robotics, and Computer Vision Laboratory, CSE, UMN
  • Mission Statement

The goal of the laboratory is to combine algorithm development with strong system building efforts that validate our algorithms. With respect to teaching, the goal is to educate top researchers/teachers and use AI, robotics, and computer vision as the vehicle to promote science/engineering principles to our students.

rangers and scouts
Rangers and Scouts

Heterogeneous robotic team

Rangers

General purpose off-road robots

Scouts

Custom portable sensor platforms

technical overview of the project goals
Technical Overview of the Project: Goals
  • Develop distributed robots (main unit is roughly the size of a soda can) with various mobility and sensory modes for exploration of structures in an urban warfare scenario.
  • Emphasize the development of innovative mobility modes for these robots.
  • Data fusion and analysis are to be at a remote operator station.
  • Effective combination of software and hardware design.
some applications
Some Applications
  • Special Unit Operations
  • Law Enforcement Agencies:
    • Hostage situations
    • Counter terrorist units in large cities
    • Fire and rescue
    • Disaster relief
  • Coast Guard: vessel boarding and search
  • FBI Fugitive Task Forces, FBI Crisis Response Team
  • NASA space exploration programs
  • Toy and Entertainment industries
scout designs
Scout Designs

Grasshopper

Rolling Ball

Scout 2001

scout 2001 vs scout 1999
Scout 2001 vs. Scout 1999
  • Complete electronic and electrical redesign
  • Significantly improved power management
  • Encoders have been added to the drive motors.
  • The internal components have all been modularized to decrease assembly and repair time from hours to minutes.
  • The jumping spring and winching motor have been improved to increase overall mechanical efficiency and the height of jumps.

Scout 2001

Scout 1999

scout jumping trial
Scout Jumping Trial

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

hardware efforts
Hardware Efforts
  • Mobility improvements
  • Communication improvements

Variable-size actuated scout wheels

Rooftop scout with grappling hook

COTSScout and MegaScout

Scout repeaters

variable size actuated scout wheels
Variable-Size Actuated Scout Wheels

wheel extended

wheel retracted

rooftop scout
Rooftop Scout
  • User feedback indicated the need for a scout that can operate on a roof or a ceiling.
  • The goal again is to achieve the desirable functionality without significant changes to the scout design.
  • The idea was to have an external scout attachment with a spring-loaded mechanism and a grappling hook.
  • Two prototypes have been built.
rooftop scout14
Rooftop Scout

Grappling Hook

Mechanism

motion detection and tracking
Motion Detection and Tracking

A computer vision algorithm was written to detect motion in the field of view and automatically track the center of motion.

low cost alternatives
Low Cost Alternatives
  • Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Scout
    • Designed to be a low cost, nearly disposable alternative with reduced functionality and slightly improved resilience
    • Physical Characteristics: 44 mm x 97 mm cylinder with 3 wheel sizes (57 mm, 64 mm, 76 mm)
    • Sensing Capability: Camera
    • Locomotion:
      • Rolling: Top speed
        • 57 mm wheel: 0.39 m/s
        • 64 mm wheel: 0.42 m/s
        • 76 mm wheel: 0.50 m/s
    • Operational Life: 190 minutes in quiescent mode, 60 minutes at top speed broadcasting video
    • Cost: < $300
low cost alternatives18
Low Cost Alternatives
  • Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Scout
control and simulation
Control and Simulation
  • Control architecture is layered and based on behaviors.
  • Rangers are the control and communication central units (utility units).
  • Lego-based platforms were used initially for rapid prototyping and experimentation.
software implementation

Prioritized Behaviors,

Mission Decomposition,

Parallel Execution

Backbone

Mission Control

Scouts, Rangers, Radios,

Video Frequencies,

Framegrabbers,

Launchers, etc.

Resource Pool

User Interface

Supervisory Workstation

Palm Pilot/Wristwatch TV’s

Scheduling, System Configuration,

Starting/Stopping Components, Load Balancing,

etc.

Software Implementation
  • CORBA
  • XML
  • C++
behavior servo to a target
Behavior: Servo to a Target
  • Human selects target
  • Robot handles servoing process
  • Assumption: known target geometry
    • Deployment and retrieval of robot
    • Navigation between waypoints
examples of vision based behaviors image mosaics
Examples of Vision-Based Behaviors (Image Mosaics)

The scout rotates 360 deg

and blends the individual images in order to

create mosaics of urban spaces.

general innovations
General Innovations
  • Design and functionality of the scouts.
  • Design of the ranger-scout system (launching, communication, navigation).
  • Simple control and communication primitives that can be reconfigured for a variety of robot behaviors.
  • Development of a large heterogeneous distributed robotic system based on these scalable, reconfigurable behaviors and physical components.
  • Miniaturization of the scout hardware peripherals (e.g. sensing, communication, etc.) required significant innovation.
  • Creation of a large variety of mobility modes in order to increase the scout functionality.
technical challenges
Technical Challenges
  • Communication!!!!!
  • Power requirements and management*
  • Design of the jumping mechanism
  • Hardening*
  • Assembly and disassembly of the scout
  • Miniaturization*
  • Human-scout interaction given a large number of scouts
  • Software issues

*High risk issues

conclusions
Conclusions
  • The scout has proven to be a simple and effective design. It has been featured on CNN, BBC, NBC, Comedy Central, and was a finalist for the Discover award.
  • Feedback from military users (Lincolnia exercises) indicates that the scout is the right design and the right size.
  • There is a patent for the overall design.
  • Various innovative mobility enhancements have been developed.
  • The COTSScout has a long life and a satisfactory set of capabilities at a very low-cost.
  • A variety of user interfaces has been developed.
  • Communication remains a challenge.
acknowledgements
Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by National Science Foundation through grant #EIA-0224363, Microsoft Inc., INEEL, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, MTO (“Distributed Robotics” Program), ARPA Order No. G155, Program Code No. 8H20, issued by DARPA/CMD under Contract #MDA972-98-C-0008

url information
URL Information

Videoclips and papers can be found at:

http://distrob.cs.umn.edu

Thank You