1 / 14

Parallel Corpora for Multilingual Ontology Learning

Parallel Corpora for Multilingual Ontology Learning. Pavel Smrz Brno University of Technology Czech Republic. Motivation. Ontologies (in computer science) are formal and machine readable representations of concepts and relations among them

andie
Download Presentation

Parallel Corpora for Multilingual Ontology Learning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Parallel Corpora for Multilingual Ontology Learning Pavel Smrz Brno University of Technology Czech Republic

  2. Motivation • Ontologies (in computer science) are formal and machine readable representations of concepts and relations among them • Ontologies can be used for efficient semantic querying, relevance measurement, sharing knowledge representation and many other purposes • Ontologies also play the major role in the Semantic Web vision (data on the web understandable by machines – Berners-Lee, OWL - Ontology Web Language)

  3. (subclass Weapon Device) (documentation Weapon "The &%Class of &%Devices that are designed primarily to damage or destroy &%Humans/&%Animals, &%StationaryArtifacts or the places inhabited by &%Humans/&%Animals.") (=> (instance ?WEAPON Weapon) (capability Damaging instrument ?WEAPON)) (=> (instance ?WEAPON Weapon) (hasPurpose ?WEAPON (exists (?DEST ?PATIENT) (and (instance ?DEST Damaging) (patient ?DEST ?PATIENT) (or (instance ?PATIENT StationaryArtifact) (instance ?PATIENT Animal) (exists (?ANIMAL) (and (instance ?ANIMAL Animal) (inhabits ?ANIMAL ?PATIENT))))))))

  4. Motivation • Three levels of generality of ontologies: • foundational (top, upper) ontology • core ontology • specific domain ontology • Domain ontologies provide common understanding of particular application domains • Creating ontologies is extremely demanding, labor-intensive and time-consuming task • Automatic acquisition (learning) of ontologies (semantic relations) from text

  5. Motivation • Pattern-based extraction of semantic relations (M. A. Hearst, 1992) • Methods for hyponymy (is-a) later adopted for other kinds of relations • Token co-occurrence techniques to gather sets of concepts belonging to the same class • Various combinations and modifications (D. Lin, A. Kilgarriff – WordSketches) • The same methods applied for subjective language identification and opinion mining

  6. OLE – Ontology Learning Platform • Based on the pattern-extraction technique • Used for ontology extraction from biomedical texts • Explicit representation of uncertainty - BayesOWL

  7. OLE – Ontology Learning Platform • OLITE processes plain text and creates the miniontologies from the extracted data • PALEA is responsible for learning of new semantic patterns • OLEMAN merges the miniontologies resulting from the OLITE module and updates the base domain ontology • NP1 [“,”]“such as” NPList2 • NP1 (“and”|“or”) “other” NP2

  8. The ontology of HATs

  9. The ontology of HATs

  10. Extracted Relations

  11. Multilingual Pattern Learning • Extraction patterns usually defined manually • The task must be repeated for each new language in a multilingual environment. • Parallel corpora for pattern acquisition: • Patterns defined for one language (English) • Semantically related expressions extracted from the given part of the corpus • Translation equivalents in all other languages • Patterns for the respective languages automatically derived from the corpus data

  12. Subjectivity Clue Extraction • CLUMSY - clue mining system for subjective language • Subjectivity clues and opinion extraction patterns defined for English • Data from parallel English-Czech corpus used for automatic acquisition of Czech patterns • Integrated in a prototype of EPOS – a new multilingual opinion mining system

  13. EPOS – Electronic Poll System

  14. Future Directions • Automatically extracted domain ontologies for PortaGe – e-learning portal generator • Opinionated parallel texts for the development of EPOS • Ontology learning from Acquis Communautaire parallel corpus – automatic acquisition of legal ontologies?

More Related