1 / 65

Fractional Dispersion and Reproduction Equations

Fractional Dispersion and Reproduction Equations. Boris Baeumer University of Otago http://www.maths.otago.ac.nz/?baeumer. Invasion of Organisms. Complex problem with lots of random factors What can be predicted? What are the right questions? Data is usually noisy.

amos-guzman
Download Presentation

Fractional Dispersion and Reproduction Equations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fractional Dispersion and Reproduction Equations Boris Baeumer University of Otago http://www.maths.otago.ac.nz/?baeumer

  2. Invasion of Organisms • Complex problem with lots of random factors • What can be predicted? What are the right questions? • Data is usually noisy. • Problems in modeling include • Environmental factors such as grazing, droughts, etc. can have big impact. • Dispersal often driven by occasional extreme event such as storms at the right time or piggybacking on animals, etc. • Where are the parents?

  3. Growth Dispersion Invasion models • Classical Fisher equation • Mostly abandoned, spread too slow…

  4. Dispersal kernel Invasion models • Classical Fisher equation • Integro-Difference equations • Semi-discrete, hard to analyse.

  5. PDE Model • To simplify things take out growth, and assume kernel is homogeneous (k(x,y)=k(x-y)) (and non-negative) • In order to get to a PDE, the kernel needs to be infinitely divisible.

  6. Infinitely divisible distributions • Lots of kernels are infinitely divisible, but not all… • Levy-Khintchine representation: • General dispersion equation (c=0):

  7. Levy-Khintchine Representation Drift Jump Intensity Gaussian Spread

  8. Special cases • Long term limit (scaling limit) • If k decays like a power-law, k converges to a stable distribution, otherwise k converges to a normal distribution • If k is symmetric,

  9. Time randomiser (Subordinator) Classical Dispersion Stable laws and fractional PDE’s

  10. Q dispersion tensor r repulsiveness Adapting to a Complex Environment • Life does not happen on the complex plane or unit circle! • Use same subordination to speed up time. a attractiveness

  11. Predominant Wind Effects or Currents • Need to randomise flow, not classical diffusion. • Need new Mathematics • Baeumer, Haase & Kovacs, Journal of Evolution Equation, 2009 • Baeumer, Kovacs & Meerschaert, Functional Analysis and Evolution Equations, 2008

  12. The classical Model

  13. The Fractional Model

  14. The fractional Dispersal and Reproduction Equation

  15. Hawthorn at Porters Pass, NZ • Obtained data set from John Kean (AgResearch) on Hawthorn at Porters Pass (data collected by Peter Williams and Rohan Buxton). • Location of trees via GPS • Age of trees estimated (chop down a few…)

  16. 1930 • First tree in 1906 • 2nd tree in 1925

  17. 1935 • First tree in 1906 • 2nd tree in 1925 • 3rd tree in 1934

  18. 1940 • First tree in 1906 • 2nd tree in 1925 • 3rd tree in 1934

  19. 1945 • First tree in 1906 • 2nd tree in 1925 • 3rd tree in 1934

  20. 1950 • First tree in 1906 • 2nd tree in 1925 • 3rd tree in 1934

  21. 1955 • First tree in 1906 • 2nd tree in 1925 • 3rd tree in 1934

  22. 1960 • First tree in 1906 • 2nd tree in 1925 • 3rd tree in 1934

  23. 1965 • First tree in 1906 • 2nd tree in 1925 • 3rd tree in 1934 • Bunnies controlled in late 50’s

  24. 1970 • First tree in 1906 • 2nd tree in 1925 • 3rd tree in 1934 • Bunnies controlled in late 50’s

  25. 1975 • First tree in 1906 • 2nd tree in 1925 • 3rd tree in 1934 • Bunnies controlled in late 50’s

  26. 1980 • First tree in 1906 • 2nd tree in 1925 • 3rd tree in 1934 • Bunnies controlled in late 50’s

  27. 1985 • First tree in 1906 • 2nd tree in 1925 • 3rd tree in 1934 • Bunnies controlled in late 50’s

  28. 1990 • First tree in 1906 • 2nd tree in 1925 • 3rd tree in 1934 • Bunnies controlled in late 50’s

  29. 1995 • First tree in 1906 • 2nd tree in 1925 • 3rd tree in 1934 • Bunnies controlled in late 50’s

  30. 2000 • First tree in 1906 • 2nd tree in 1925 • 3rd tree in 1934 • Bunnies controlled in late 50’s

  31. 2005 • First tree in 1906 • 2nd tree in 1925 • 3rd tree in 1934 • Bunnies controlled in late 50’s

  32. Growth (Williams et al, preprint)

  33. What about spread? • Hard to quantify • Infested area • Mean distance to original tree • Furthest distance to original tree • Other statistics (function of time) • Proportion of trees at a distance >r • Tree density map

  34. Keep it simple • Assume growth independent of density (may depend on time) • Growth is a then a factor in the solution; i.e., C(t,x)=G(t)c(t,x), where c is the solution with zero growth (or number of trees normalised) • Model proportion of trees at a certain distance to Grandpa tree gives probability of tree at a distance greater than r.

  35. Simple subordinated equation • Two parameter model • C(r,t) is the proportion of trees at a distance greater than r from original tree

More Related