R sartori thank you to the people who contributed
Download
1 / 16

R Sartori Thank you to the people who contributed - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 90 Views
  • Uploaded on

Impact of rotation and momentum input on the L-H transition. R Sartori Thank you to the people who contributed. Outline of the talk L-H threshold and: Changes in rotation by changing NBI torque (DIII-D) Changes in rotation due to changes in SOL flow (Alcator C-Mod)

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'R Sartori Thank you to the people who contributed' - amelie


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
R sartori thank you to the people who contributed

Impact of rotation and momentum input on the L-H transition

R Sartori

Thank you to the people who contributed


R sartori thank you to the people who contributed

Outline of the talk

L-H threshold and:

  • Changes in rotation by changing NBI torque (DIII-D)

  • Changes in rotation due to changes in SOL flow (Alcator C-Mod)

  • Changes in rotation due to TF ripple (JET)

  • Changes in rotation due to changes in momentum input: NBI vs no momentum input ICH and ECH (Asdex Upgrade and JET)

  • Changes in rotation due to RMP


R sartori thank you to the people who contributed

DIII-D: L-H threshold depends on applied beam torque and toroidal rotation

  • The L-H threshold power is reduced by a factor of 3 going from prevalent co-injectionto prevalent counter in USN (ion grad-B drift away from X-point)

  • Smaller reduction of PLH in LSN  ~80%

  • No difference between USN and LSN for counter and balanced injection

  • Reduction in edge toroidal rotation is correlated with the observed reduction in L-H threshold power

P Gohil, H-mode workshop 2007


R sartori thank you to the people who contributed

DIII-D: L-H threshold depends on applied beam torque and toroidal rotation

The L-H transition can be induced by reduction of applied torque at constant power


The experiment

DIII-D: L-H threshold dependence on torque/rotation is independent of ion mass

The experiment

P Gohil, NF, to be published

  • The increase of PLH with torque is seen also in Hydrogen plasmas

  • In Hydrogen a factor of 2 larger threshold observed in the range of torque explored


Description of the experiment

DIII-D: Changes in rotation/torque correlate with edge turbulence dynamics

Description of the Experiment

GR McKee, IAEA 2008

D J Schlossberg, Phys. Of Plasmas, 2009

  • Changes in fluctuation level and flow pattern between co-injection and balanced injection

  • Turbulence flow reversal in balanced injection  poloidal flow shear

  • Correlation between changes in injected torque and poloidal group velocity of turbulence near edge

  • spectra obtained in 100 ms before L-H. Phase shift of poloidally displaced channels Z=1.2cm.


Description of the experiment1

DIII-D: Increased Er shear at lower rotation turbulence dynamics

Description of the Experiment

  • Interplay between pressure gradient and v X B terms in Er:

  • lower contribution of toroidal rotation term  increase in Er shear at the edge de-correlation and suppression of turbulence .


R sartori thank you to the people who contributed

Alcator C-Mod: Changes in L-H threshold correlated with changes in SOL flows/rotation

From H Hubbard, EPS 2004

  • Changes in core rotation correlated with changes of SOL flows (largest in inner SOL)

  • PLH two times higher in USN (ion B drift away from X-point )

  • Strong parallel flows are driven in the inner SOL, co-current for LSN, counter current for USN

  • At the L-H threshold flows and rotation near a constant value, independent of configuration  strong suggestion that SOL flows are causing differences in PLH with configuration


Comparison of density and temperature and toroidal rotation profiles

JET: Variation of toroidal rotation due to TF ripple changes changes in SOL flows/rotation

Comparison of density and temperature and toroidal rotation profiles

  • Lower rotation with increasing ripple. Edge rotation becomes negative at high ripple

  • ASCOT calculation  that dominant mechanism for reduction of rotation is banana orbit diffusion  induces a radial return current  JXB torque in counter current direction. For ripple of 0.5% this torque was found to be 20-30% of that supplied by the NB system

1.5% ripple: L-modes with low level of beam power

P De Vries et al, NF 48 2008


Comparison of power and torque density

JET: L-H threshold is not affected by large variation in toroidal rotation due to TF ripple

Comparison of power and torque density

  • 0.08% ripple  v in co-current direction

  • 1 % ripple  v in counter-current direction

  • Similar Te and Ti the transition

  • v unaffected by ripple

Y Andrew et al, PPCF 50 2008


Global and pedestal confinement is similar

Asdex Upgrade: L-H threshold is independent of heating method momentum input/rotation

Global and pedestal confinement is similar

  • No difference in L-H power threshold and in the density dependence of PLH between ICH and NBI, for both D and He plasmas

F Ryter et al, NF 49 2009


R sartori thank you to the people who contributed

JET: L-H threshold is independent of heating method method momentum input/rotation

  • JET results shows that L-H access is independent of heating method, as seen previously in JET for all H isotopes

    • New data confirms the results and shows typical changes from ~6-8 kHz (NBI+ICH) down to ~2.5KHz (ICH) at 3T with similar threshold

Data from 1MA/1T to 3.8MA/3.8T

LH scaling from Righi et al NF 39, 1999

Andrew et al, PPCF 48 2006


R sartori thank you to the people who contributed

Effect of RMPs on the L-H transition method

Summary from Carlos Hidalgo- H-mode workshop talk

JET

No effect observed (2009 experimental campaign)

MAST

On MAST there is observation of the delay of the L-H transition time if the n=1 coils are applied before the L-H transition but not with n=3.

DIII-D

In Helium plasmas PL-H increased by >50% in the presence of n=3 RMP perturbations.  

NSTX

PL-H increases from ~1.4 to 2.6 MW with higher n=3 current (~65% increase for Pheat/ne)


Summary and future work
Summary and future work method

NXTS and JET results on L-H threshold with RMP

  • PLH increases from ~1.4 to 2.6 MW with higher n=3 current

  • PLH unaffected by application of RMP if effect exists it depends on the strenght of the perturbation

  • 30% decrease in rotation


R sartori thank you to the people who contributed

Summary method

  • Evidence from DIII-D of strong effect of beam torque on L-H threshold

    • The effect persist when mass (and X-point height) are changed

    • For counter-injection, it reduces differences between favourable and unfavourable grad-B direction

  • The effect is less strong in favourable grad-B direction (why?), therefore effect on threshold scaling not as large as largest reported variations

  • When rotation is changed by changing heating methods and ripple the L-H threshold is unchanged, with RMP it increases or is unvaried  suggest weaker link with rotation in DIII-D results


Comparison with same density and total power

JET data : LSN configuration and reversed B method t and Ip

Comparison with same density and total power

  • Reversed Bt direction ion B drift away from X-point and counter injection

  • Forward Bt direction ion B drift towards X-point and co injection

  • No difference between L-H power threshold with ion B drift direction in the JET data.