1 / 9

Thinking Relationally

Thinking Relationally. Why it is important and how you can use it in your research Dr. Norman Gabriel. Dominant Substantialist Tendencies. Misguided dichotomies in social thought: Individual and Society Subject and Object Internal and External Reason and Emotion Mind and Body

amandla
Download Presentation

Thinking Relationally

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Thinking Relationally Why it is important and how you can use it in your research Dr. Norman Gabriel

  2. Dominant Substantialist Tendencies • Misguided dichotomies in social thought: • Individual and Society • Subject and Object • Internal and External • Reason and Emotion • Mind and Body • Micro and Macro • Qualitative and Quantitative

  3. Relational, Processual Thinking • Classical sociological tradition – Marx and Simmel • American pragmatists such as Dewey and Mead • Phenomenologists like Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty • All share a concern for ever-shifting, evolving webs of relations • My research has focused on the work of Norbert Elias

  4. An brief introduction to Norbert Elias (1897-1990)

  5. Emancipating sociology from static polarities • Individual/group, nature/culture, action/structure • Sociology as a relatively autonomous discipline attuned to the dynamic and relationalaspects of human beings in their societies • Unique, emergent properties and regularities at the human-social level of natural integration • Webs of interdependence: a flexible lattice work of tensions in every figuration

  6. How I am using this relational perspective in my research • Inter-generational relationships and institutions – focusing on power dimensions and processes between young children and adults • Potential for interdisciplinary and cross-disciplinary collaboration • How do we integrate relevant disciplines – for example, biology, psychology and sociology?

  7. An example from educational philosophy • A child is born human; but this humanity consists in being without instincts, totally dependent, in an environment which is not natural, but the product of human artifice. He can survive only by being cared for. He can do nothing just nothing to help himself. He has to learn everything to see, to move about, to walk, to speak: and while he is learning these basic elements of humanity, his human life consists in his relation to those who care for him who feel for him, think and plan for him, act for him. This dependence on others is his life - yet to be human he must reach beyond it, not to independence, but to an interdependence in which he can give as well as receive (Macmurray, 2012: 666)

  8. How can you use this in your research • What is your research question? • Understanding and explaining dynamic fields of practice • Examining shifting social relations among interdependent people, positions and institutions within society • Focusing on changing balances of power – resources emerge out of, function within and restructure social relationships

  9. References • Elias, Norbert (2009) ‘Figuration’, in Essays III: On Sociology and the Humanities (Dublin: University College Press, 2009 [Collected Works, vol. 16], pp. 1-3. • Norbert Elias (2010) The Society of Individuals. Dublin: UCD Press [Collected Works, vol. 10] • John Macmurray (2012), ‘Learning to be Human’, Oxford Review of Education, 38, 6: 661-674

More Related