1 / 29

Plan

alyn
Download Presentation

Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Phase Structure of Thermal QCD/QED:A “Gauge Invariant” Analysis based on theHTL Improved Ladder Dyson-Schwinger Equation Hisao NAKKAGAWANara Universityin collaboration withHiroshi YOKOTA and Koji YOSHIDANara UniversityarXiv:0707.0929 [hep-ph] (to appear in proc. of sQGP’07, Nagoya, Feb. 2007) hep-ph/0703134 (to appear in proc. of SCGT’06, Nagoya, Nov. 2006)[An Isaac Newton Institute Workshop on Exploring QCD : Deconfinement, Extreme Environments and Holography, Cambridge, August 20-24, 2007]

  2. Plan 1. Introduction 2. HTL Resummed DS Equation a) Improved Ladder Approximation b) Improved Instantaneous Exchange Approximation 3. Consistency with the Ward-Takahashi Identity 4. Numerical Calculation a) Landau gauge (constant gauges) b) nonlinear gauge : momentum dependent 5. Summary and Outlook

  3. 1. Introduction [A] Why Dyson-Schwinger Equation (DSE)? 1) Rigorous FT eq. to study non-perturbative phenomena 2) Possibility of systematic improvement of the interaction kernel through analytic study inclusion of the dominant thermal effect (HTL), etc. [B] DSE with the HTL resummed interaction kernel Difficult to solve 1) Point vertex = ladder kernel (Z1 = 1) 2) Improved ladder kernel (HTL resummed propagator) 3) Instantaneous exchange approximation to the longitudinal propagator transverse one: keep the full HTL resummed form

  4. Introduction (cont’d) [C] Landau gauge analysis 1) Importance of the HTL correction Large “correction” to the results from the free kernel 2) Large imaginary part: Real A, B, C rejected But ! 3) A(P) significantly larger than 1: A(P) ~1.4 or larger NB: A(P) = 1 required from the Ward-Takahashi Identity Z1 = Z2 4) Same results in the constant gauges [D] Nonlinear gauge inevitable to satisfy the Ward-Takahashi Identity Z1 = Z2, and to get gauge “invariant” result (in the same sense at T=0 analysis)

  5. 2. Hard-Thermal-Loop Resummed Dyson-Schwinger EquationsPTP 107 (2002) 759 Real Time Formalism A(P), B(P), C(P) : Invariant complex functions

  6. HTL resummed gauge boson propagator Improved Instantaneous Exchange Approximation ( set in the Longitudinal part ) To be got rid of at least in the Distribution Function Exact HTL resummed form for the Transverse part and for the Gauge part (gauge part: no HTL corrections)

  7. HTL resummed vertex and thepoint vertex approximation (Improved Ladder Approximation)

  8. HTL Resummed DS Equations for the Invariant Functions A, B, and C(A, BandC : functions with imaginary parts)PTP 107 (2002) 759 & 110 (2003) 777

  9. 3. Consistency with the WT Identity Vacuum QED/QCD : In the Landau gauge A(P) = 1 guaranteed in the ladder SD equation where Z1 = 1 WT identity satisfied : “gauge independent” solution Finite Temperature/Density : Even in the Landau gauge A(P) ≠ 1 in the ladder SD equation where Z1 = 1 WT identity not satisfied : “gauge dependent” solution

  10. To get a solution satisfying the WT identity through the ladder DSE at finite temperature: (1) Assume the nonlinear gauge such that the gauge parameter being a function of the momentum (2) In solving DSE iteratively, impose A(P) = 1 by constraint (for the input function at each step of the iteration) Can get a solution satisfying A(P) = 1 ?! thus, satisfying the Ward-Takahashi identity!! Same level of discussion possible as the vacuum QED/QCD

  11. Gauge invariance (Ward-Takahashi Identity) T=0 Landau gauge ( ) holds because A(P)=1 for the point vertex T. Maskawa and H. Nakajima, PTP 52,1326(1974) PTP 54, 860(1975) Find the gauge such thatA(P)= 1 holds Z1 = Z2 (= 1) holds “Gauge invariant” results

  12. 4. Numerical calculation • Cutoff at in unit of • A(P),B(P),C(P) at lattice sites are calculated by iteration procedure ★quantities at (0, 0.1) are shown in the figures corresponds to the “static limit” PTP 107 (2002) 759 & 110 (2003) 777

  13. depends on momentum Requireintegral equationfor Expand by a series of functions expansion coefficients(both real and complex studied) Minimize Determine

  14. Momentum dependent ξ analysis First, show the solution in comparison with those in the fixed gauge parameter • A(P) very close to 1 (imaginary part close to 0) • Optimal gauge ? complex ξ v.s. real ξ

  15. α=4.0 : ξ(q0,q) v.s. constant ξ ξ= 0.05 ● ξ= 0.025● ξ= 0.0● ξ= -0.025 ● ξ= -0.05● ξ(q0,q) Realξ ○Complexξ●

  16. α=4.0 : ξ(q0,q) v.s. constant ξ ξ(q0,q) (Landau) ξ= 0.0 ξ= -0.025 ξ= -0.05 ξ= 0.025 ξ= 0.05

  17. Optimal Gauge

  18. Optimal Gauge

  19. Real and complex ξ analyses give the same solutionwhen the condition A(P)= 1 is properly imposed! References: arXiv:0707.0929 [hep-ph], to appear in proc. of the Int’l Workshop on “Strongly Coupled QGP (sQGP’07)”, Nagoya, Feb. 2007. hep-ph/0703134, to appear in proc. of the Int’l Workshop on “Origin of Mass and Strong Coupling Gauge Theories (SCGT06)”, Nagoya, Nov. 2006.

  20. Real and complex ξ give the same solution when the condition A(P)= 1 is properly imposed! (fixed α analysis) ν= 0.378 Realξ ○ Complexξ ● ν= 0.350 ν= 0.380 α= 4.5 α= 5.0 α= 4.0 ν= 0.445 ν= 0.423 α= 3.5 α= 3.7 α= 3.2 ν=0.400~0.460

  21. <ν> =0.395 α= 4.5 α= 5.0 α= 4.0 α= 3.5 α= 3.7 α= 3.2

  22. Real and complex ξ give the same solutionwhen the condition A(P)= 1 is properly imposed!(fixed T analysis) <η> =0.522 T=0.120 T=0.105 T=0.110 T=0.115 T=0.125 T=0.100 Realξ ○ Complexξ ●

  23. Phase Diagram in (T,1/α)-plane(Comparison with the Landau gauge analysis) Symmetric Phase Broken Phase

  24. Phase Diagram in (T,1/α)-plane(Comparison with the Landau gauge analysis) Symmetric Phase Broken Phase

  25. Phase Diagram in (T,1/α)-plane(Landau gauge analysis)

  26. 5. Summary and Outlook • DS equation at finite temperature is solved in the (“nonlinear”) gauge to make the WT identity hold • The solution satisfies A(P)=1, consistent with the WT identity Z1 = Z2 gauge “invariant” solution ! Very plausible!! • Significant discrepancy from the Landau gauge case, though is small • Critical exponents ν : depends on the coupling strength !? η : independent of the temperature

  27. Summary and Outlook (cont’d) • Both the Real and Complex analyses : Give the samesolution(present result) ! gauge “invariant” solution ! stand the same starting level as the vacuum QED/QCD analysis • Application to QCD at finite T and density In future • Manifestly gauge invariant analysis • Analysis of the co-existing phases • Analytic solution

More Related