1 / 37

EBP Workshop: RMH November 2012 searching the literature

EBP Workshop: RMH November 2012 searching the literature. Peter Greenberg Physician: Department of General Medicine and Melbourne EpiCentre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH) & Honorary Principal Fellow: Schools of Medicine & Population Health, The University of Melbourne Catherine Voutier

alvin-grant
Download Presentation

EBP Workshop: RMH November 2012 searching the literature

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EBP Workshop: RMH November 2012 searching the literature Peter Greenberg Physician: Department of General Medicine and Melbourne EpiCentre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH) & Honorary Principal Fellow: Schools of Medicine & Population Health, The University of Melbourne Catherine Voutier Clinical Librarian, Health Sciences Library, Royal Melbourne Hospital

  2. searching the literature managing clinical research evidence evidence based practice (EBP) information, knowledge and wisdom search techniques and strategies

  3. managing clinical research evidenceinformation can bepushedor pulled pushed: alerts us to information we might need* ‘just in case’ learning: a) lay resourcesradio; films; television; books; newspapers...... b) professional resourcestextbooks; journals; e-subscriptions; “e-feeds”.... pulled: access information when we need it* ‘just in time’ learning:useful whenever questions arise!

  4. evidence-based clinical practice (EBP) begins by clarifying patients’ issues, which arise during consultations EBP involves a series of ‘steps’: asking questions seeking answers critical appraisal of retrieved literature applying data to patients’ problems integrating information with the patients’ values

  5. information, knowledge and wisdomwhat do literature searches deliver? “information” “knowledge” information which is considered and applicable “wisdom”knowledge applied with experience see “The Rock” by T.S. Eliot (1934) for the difference between information, knowledge and wisdom

  6. more about asking questions 1) what is the question about?therapy? diagnosis? cause? risk? prognosis?…….. 2) is the question general (‘background’) or specific for this patient (‘foreground’)? 3) how are questions best structured to facilitate searches for answers?

  7. ‘background’ and ‘foreground’ questions background * topic (e.g. ‘disease’)orientated * general rather than specific * begin with: ‘how’; ‘what’; ‘which’; ‘why’; ‘do’; ‘does’…..... foreground * patient-problem oriented * specific* rather then general* structured format foreground question components become search terms!

  8. ‘background’ and ‘foreground’questions in reality, there is a continuous spectrum from ‘background’ to ‘foreground’ questions

  9. why structure ‘foreground’ questionsin PICO(T) format?Patient (Population) Intervention Comparison Outcome Time 1) requires you to consider questions carefully++ 2)you can search with some (or all) PICO(T) terms! 3) practice is needed to choose terms which: * precisely address your questions * are not too specific to provide answers

  10. searching the literature managing clinical research evidence evidence based practice (EBP) information, knowledge and wisdom search techniques and strategies

  11. search techniques available e-resources MeSH* terms * medical subject heading searching ‘secondary’ data sources searching ‘primary’ data sources

  12. search techniques available e-resources* via “Clinicians Health Channel” via Hospital (University or other) library via private subscription via www at no cost

  13. search techniques available e-resources via “Clinicians Health Channel” via Hospital (University or other) library via private subscription via www at no cost * ‘PubMed’ (free ‘Medline’ access) * The Cochrane Library * ‘TRIP database’ * ’BMJ/McMaster Evidence Updates’ * ‘TRIP database’ * ’BMJ/McMaster Evidence Updates’ * ‘NHMRC (NICS) Clinical Guidelines Portal ‘ * ‘Google’ & ‘Google Scholar’

  14. search techniques available e-resources MeSH* terms * medical subject heading searching ‘secondary’ sources searching ‘primary’ sources

  15. searching with Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms

  16. Entry(MeSH) Term: Diabetes Mellitus, Type1 • Diabetes Mellitus, Brittle • Brittle Diabetes Mellitus • Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin-Dependent • Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus • Diabetes Mellitus, Juvenile-Onset • Juvenile-Onset Diabetes Mellitus • Diabetes Mellitus, Ketosis Prone • Ketosis-Prone Diabetes Mellitus • Diabetes Mellitus, Sudden-Onset • Mellitus, Sudden-Onset Diabetes • Sudden-Onset Diabetes Mellitus • Diabetes Mellitus, Type I • IDDM • Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus • Diabetes, Autoimmune • Autoimmune Diabetes

  17. MeSH • MEDLINE entries are indexed with ~30,000 thesaurus terms and ~85 sub-headings for sensitive, specific and efficient searching • MeSH terms * applied to publications as specifically as possible * cover ~106concepts • each publication has ~10-20 MeSH terms • MEDLINE#& ‘The Cochrane Library’ have: * MeSH browsers: which assign ‘MeSH’ to ‘text’ terms * MeSH tree displays * automatic mapping of text to MeSH terms #accessedthrough ‘PubMed’, ‘EBSCO’ (Clinicians Health Channel); Institute for Scientific Information (ISI): Thompson Scientific. (The University of Melbourne), “OVID”…….

  18. search techniques available resources MeSH* terms * medical subject heading searching ‘secondary’ sources searching ‘primary’ sources

  19. search techniques • ‘secondary’ databases* ‘filtered’ or derived from research publications e.g. ‘critical appraisals’; comments; summaries; syntheses, texts…. * fewer citations * faster, efficient, easier searching * less sensitive, but more specific searchesfewer citations, both relevant and irrelevant • ‘primary’ databases * original research publications * many citations * harder, slower searching * more sensitive, but less specific searches more citations, both relevant and irrelevant

  20. evidence summaries texts systematic reviews ‘filtered’ by peers for relevance/importance structured abstractsand commentaries ‘Clinical Evidence’see “Best Practice” (CHC) CHC resourcessee ‘Best Practice’ & ‘DynaMed’ otherresources“UpToDate”……... ‘Cochrane Reviews’see ‘The Cochrane Library’ ‘BMJ/McMaster Evidence Updates’ ‘ACP* Journal Club’* American College of Physicians examples of ‘secondary’ databasescontentexample

  21. other secondary sources of evidence • clinical practice guidelines*: -‘systematically developed statements to assist practitioner (and patient) -decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances’ • (integrated) clinical pathways*: “multidisciplinary outlines of anticipated care, placed in an appropriate timeframe, to help a patient with a specific condition or set of symptoms move progressively through a clinical experience to positive outcomes.” *their value depends on the rigour of the development process

  22. search techniques available resources MeSH* terms * medical subject heading searching ‘secondary’ sources searching ‘primary’ sources

  23. search techniques • ‘primary’ databases* original research publications * many citations * harder, slower searching * more sensitive, but less specific searchesmore citations, both relevant and irrelevant • ‘secondary’ databases * ‘filtered’ or derived from research publications e.g. ‘critical appraisals’; comments; summaries; syntheses, texts…. * fewer citations * faster, efficient, easier searching * less sensitive, but more specific searchesfewer citations, both relevant and irrelevant

  24. examples of ‘primary’ databases • ‘MEDLINE’ access:* ‘PubMed’* ‘ISI’Institute for Scientific Information: Thompson Scientific. (The University of Melbourne.)*‘EBSCO’ (Clinicians Health Channel) * ‘OVID’……... • Cochrane Library: “Clinical Trials” • ‘CINAHL’Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature • ‘EMBASE’Excerpta Medica Database (drugs) • PsycINFO American Psychological Association (psychological abstracts) • other…. ?

  25. searching ‘Medline’ (‘PubMed’)some tips MeSH browsernote the 2 option boxes below the sub-headings:* “Restrict to MeSH Major Topic” * “Do not include MeSH terms found below this term in the MeSH hierarchy” after retrieving publications, check:* “ Search details” to see how the search was undertaken # #truncation (e.g. Palliat*) removes ‘mapping’ to MeSH terms * “Related citations in PubMed” for additional, relevant citations * “Search History” to combine searches: see “Advanced” * MeSH terms allocated: alternative MeSH terms are displayed beneath citations “Clinical Queries” provides efficient, specific searching with “in-built” search filters limits or qualifiersavoid these unless absolutely necessary, at the end of search

  26. searching ‘The Cochrane Library’some tips • always do a MeSH search as well– type in a single term and locate appropriate MeSH term by clicking on “Thesaurus” button’ – select best term from list – click on “View Results” •if searches involve > 1 search term, repeat the above •combine search results via ‘Search History’ • avoid adding limits or qualifiers until necessary

  27. searchstrategy depends on… what the question is about: therapy, diagnosis, cause, risk…….. question type: ‘background’, ‘foreground’ availability of and experience with particular databases the purpose of the literature search write a paper use primary sources of research data systematic review useprimary sources of research data research project use primary sources of research data manage a patient use secondary resources first time available secondary sources if there is little time prevalence of issue secondary sources for common issues

  28. search techniques and strategy summary • formulate the best PICO(T) question • use MeSH terms • use secondary databases first

  29. further reading asking questions Straus S, Richardson SR, Glasziou P, Haynes BR. Evidence-Based Medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. 3rd ed. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone. 2005 Glasziou , Del Mar C. Evidence-based Practice Workbook, 2nd Ed.Blackwell/BMJ Books. 2007 Oxman AD, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature: I. How to get started. JAMA 1993:270:2093-2095. Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, Hayward RSA. The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. [Editorial]. ACP J Club 1995; 123(3):A12-13 Richardson WS. Ask, and ye shall retrieve. [EBM Note]. Evidence Based Medicine 1998; 3:100-101. Mitchell G. Reframing the question. A way of applying evidence based medicine to a common clinical situation. Aust Fam Physician 1998; 27:875-6. Stone PW. Popping the (PICO) question in research and evidence-based practice. Appl Nurs Res 2002; 15:197-8. Onady GM, Raslich MA. Evidence-based medicine: asking the answerable question (question templates as tools). Pediatr Rev 2003; 24:265-268. Southern Health Centre for Clinical Effectiveness: Evidence-Based Answers to Clinical Questions for Busy Clinicians. Workbook 2009 http://www.southernhealth.org.au/icms_docs/2145_EBP_workbook.pdf ‘Asking focused questions”. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Oxford(UK) http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1036http An interactive tool from the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine Toronto http://ktclearinghouse.ca/cebm/practise/formulate

  30. further reading searching the literature for answers Straus S, Richardson SR, Glasziou P, Haynes BR. Evidence-Based Medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. 3rd ed. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone. 2005 Glasziou , Del Mar C. Evidence-based Practice Workbook, 2nd Ed.Blackwell/BMJ Books. 2007 “Help” and “Tutorials” sections within e-databases JAMA ‘Users’ guides’ series. Oxman AD, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature: I. How to get started. JAMA. 1993;270:2093-2095 Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: the basics of Evidence-based Medicine. BMJ, London.1997 Ebbert JO, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ. Searching the medical literature using PubMed: a tutorial. Mayo Clin Proc.2003; 78:87-91). Robinson A, Day S. The value of PubMed and HighWire Press for the busy general practitioner. Australian Prescriber 2004; 27(Number 1):16-18. Sood A, Erwin PJ, Ebbert JO. Using advanced search tools on PubMed for citation retrieval. Mayo Clin Proc 2004; 79:1295-1300. Giustini G. How Google is changing medicine. BMJ 2005; 331:1487-1488 Steinbrook R. Searching for the right search -Reaching the medical literature. N Eng J Med 2006; 354:4-7 Tank H, Ng JHK. Googling for a diagnosis-use of Google as a diagnostic aid: internet based study. BMJ 2006; 333:1143-1145

More Related