almira
Uploaded by
8 SLIDES
228 VIEWS
80LIKES

Enhancing Wireless Charging Architecture: QA Considerations for Safety and Performance

DESCRIPTION

In our analysis of wireless charging architecture, we highlight two fundamental structures: the feedback control loop and dynamic service discovery. We aim to revisit the QA decisions for these elements, emphasizing QA priorities including safety, availability, and performance. A significant safety risk is overheating of the coil, potentially leading to fire. We propose a feedback control loop to monitor electricity flow and mitigate overheating risks. Additionally, while service-oriented architecture (SOA) enables flexibility, dynamic discovery poses safety challenges, advocating for a local registry approach to enhance security.

1 / 8

Download Presentation

Enhancing Wireless Charging Architecture: QA Considerations for Safety and Performance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CPSC 875 John D. McGregor Quality Attribute Design

  2. We have identified 2 major structures in the wireless charging architecture. • We skipped over the QA reasons for these structures so I want to revisit those decisions.

  3. 2 major elements • Feedback control loop • Dynamic service discovery

  4. QA priorities for wireless charging • Safety • Availability • Efficient (performance) • Flexibility • Modifiable • Security

  5. Major risk • Overheating of the coil is a major risk to safety. • If not regulated there is a high probability of overheating. • If it overheats, the consequences are a fire which destroys the vehicle. • We can’t reduce the fire risk so we try to reduce the probability by controlling the flow of electricity.

  6. Feedback Control loop • The feedback control loop style monitors the flow of electricity and can keep it within range. • This style reduces the probability of overheating. • Must be able to adjust System faster than the System can change its output Monitor Control System

  7. Service Oriented • The service oriented style provides flexibility due to the ease with which a new service can replace an existing one. • However, dynamic discovery is too error prone for a real-time system. • This is a safety concern and an availability concern. • Use SOA but not dynamic discovery; have a local registry

  8. What’s next • Security

More Related