370 likes | 494 Views
This comprehensive guide, presented by the Yale Faculty of Arts and Sciences, outlines essential strategies for developing a funded research program. It highlights the importance of effective proposal writing as a cornerstone for securing grants, achieving career independence, and advancing your professional journey. The guide also addresses common challenges faced during the grant application process while providing practical tips on networking, publication, and collaboration. By cultivating a goal-oriented lifestyle and embracing rejection, researchers can improve their chances of success in the competitive funding landscape.
E N D
Developing a Funded Research Program Yale Faculty of Arts and Sciences– October 15, 2013
Why do I want to land a grant? • Proposal writing is key to: • Funding your own research • Creating and controlling your work environment • Independence • Getting a job • Getting a better job • Higher Salary • Being promoted
What proposal writing is like? • No sleep • Poor diet • Chaotic • Stressful • Annoy people with your needs • People annoy you • Temporary family disaster
Strategies to Secure Funding • Develop a goal oriented lifestyle • Write Publications • Partnering • Networking • Submit proposals • Develop a national reputation • Recognize an opportunity
Proposal Writing • Is one SMALL aspect of landing a grant. • Most workshops focus on the mechanicsof proposal writing. Most are lead by non grant active administrators. • Whether or not your proposal is funded depends on a well written proposal PLUS other aspects we will talk about today. • A poorly written proposal will disqualify you no matter how good the idea.
Goal Oriented Lifestyle • Develop THE PLAN. • What specifically is your area of expertise and interest? • Where do you want to be in five years? • Where do you want to be in ten years? • The biggest predictor of achieving your goals is being able to articulate them.
Determine Overarching Career Goals • Develop a timeline with goals and objectives. • Developing new goals = GOOD. • Giving up = BAD.
Proposal Writing Philosophy • EMBRACE REJECTION! • Successful PIs learn to navigate barriers. • Everybody encounters barriers, successful PIs learn to get beyond them.
PUBLICATIONS • Can NOT get a federal grant without them. • Set a minimum of two per year. • Hierarchy • Peer reviewed journals – shoot for tier 1 in your area • Chapters • Books • Briefs and Reports
Partnering • Who is interested in what you are interested in? • State and Federal Government • Community • Other departments/schools at Yale • Other Universities (ride on somebody else’s coat tails when you are junior)
Networking • Present at national conferences every year and eat dinner • Get involved in organizational administration • Review papers • Scientific panels • Sit on advisory councils • Attend coalition interest groups • Contact federal, state and local government • Contact national/international figures in areas of interest
Proposals • The biggest predictor of getting funding is applying • Write lots of proposals (3 per year) • Take the reviewer comments • Improve • Try again
Developing a National Reputation • Publications, Publications, Publications • Conference presentations • Review papers and proposals • National advisory committees • National Academy of Sciences • Make contact with others with national reputations
Recognize an Opportunity • Say “YES” when people ask you to collaborate • Don’t get bogged down with dead weight • Don’t invest your time in somebody else’s career • Its usually as much work to get a big grant as a little one
Strategies to Land Funding • APPLY! • Talk to program officers • Look at who and how somebody whose work is similar to yours secured funding • Collaborate with others who have funding
Money Attracts Money • Begin with low hanging fruit • Special federal grants for new PIs • Training grants • Seed Funding • Funding for administrators returning to research • State and community funding
Hang out with the popular crowd • Offer to be a CO-PI and write proposals with big named national reputations with funding • Collaborate on publications with leaders in your field
Improving your odds • Follow directions explicitly • Get letters of commitment NOT support • Add on areas of expertise even if you can do those things
What funding agencies & panels are looking for • Demonstrate a void you can fill • Show you can hit the ground running • Support and collaboration • Multidisciplinary applications • Somebody else invested in you • Sexy idea • Innovation • Topic is interesting AND important • You will make your funding agency look good
Identify Funding Sources • State • Federal • More than one avenue • The TOP funded researchers at US universities are not applying for RO1s • Foundation
Federal Funding – The Golden Standard • Must have an upward research trajectory • Imperative to show you are research active • Must show expertise through publications • Must demonstrate experience on managing smaller awards before chasing big dollars • R21 precedes an R01
Mechanics of Proposal Writing method problem goals staff appendix stats budget title evaluate
Outside the Scope of this presentation • EXERCISE: P & B
HINT # 1Make Life Easier • Borrow, copy, remodel, recycle • No need to reinvent the wheel • All your work should be leading to the same place so a proposal is not new work • You will learn to develop proposal language
HINT # 2Don’t Be Lazy! • NEVER EVER PLAGIARIZE! Software will tell • The application MUST match the RFA – don’t shove a square peg in a round hole • Same group of reviewers and they have good memories
HINT # 3Develop Yourself First • Writing an excellent research proposal is just one aspect of successfully funding a project • Developing a successful research PROGRAM is essential
HINT # 4Others Have Grants • Don’t bank on everything I say • There is more than one way to skin a cat • This presentation is a reflection of my experience with the grant process • Observe and mentor with other successfully grant funded researchers
HINT # 5You Cannot Fool a Panel! • Reviewers are experts in your area • That is why they are reviewers • They easily feel offended if you overlook their work • Cite their work • Be on top of the literature
HINT # 6Snap Judgments • It takes 30 seconds to judge you! • First impressions taint and frame the entire review. • Publications better be commensurate with experience, funding, and years out of training • References – 90-95% of the literature should be in the last five years except for seminal citations. Be on top of the literature. • PET PEEVE is grant apps with references that stop when investigator graduated school
HINT # 7Sell Yourself • Promote! Promote! Promote! • You must show you are amazing, going to solve an important issue, are brilliant, have the means to do it, know what you are doing. • You must do this even if it makes you uncomfortable • Cultural Issues
HINT # 8Be Responsive • Respond to Program Officer • Respond to RFA/RFP • Respond to foundation or center goals. They are usually on websites
HINT # 9Funding Faux Pas • There is no relationship between how much you ask for and being funded as long as you are below the cap • Asking for too little makes you seem naïve and a novice which makes your reviewer think negatively of you • A grant award results in a contract. You MUST deliver what you promise even if the funding is insufficient
HINT # 10Strategies for Career Stage • New Faculty • Research Active but not Grant Active
Time to Write a Grant • 300 Hours R01 • 400-600 for a Multi Investigator Program Grant • Get as much stuff done ahead. Bio-Sketch • Descriptions of facilities, resources, etc. • Borrow the “non-science” aspects from other proposals • Look at successful proposals
Ask for help, bounce off ideas, search for funding, how to get started, GRANTS THERAPY