Supreme court case review
Download
1 / 31

- PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 107 Views
  • Updated On :

Supreme Court Case Review. Rights Checks and Balances Equal Treatment under the Law. Established the Courts Power of Judicial Review. Marbury v. Madison McCulloch v. Maryland State v. Mann Leandro v. North Carolina.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about '' - aleda


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Supreme court case review l.jpg

Supreme Court Case Review

Rights

Checks and Balances

Equal Treatment under the Law


Established the courts power of judicial review l.jpg
Established the Courts Power of Judicial Review

  • Marbury v. Madison

  • McCulloch v. Maryland

  • State v. Mann

  • Leandro v. North Carolina


The necessary and proper clause was interpreted to include creation of a national bank in the case l.jpg
The Necessary and Proper Clause was Interpreted to include creation of a National Bank in the case

  • Marbury v.Madison

  • McCulloch v. Maryland

  • State v. Mann

  • Leandro v. North Carolina


The ability to review laws and declare them unconstitutional is called l.jpg
The ability to review laws and declare them unconstitutional is called

  • Veto power

  • Apportionment

  • Judicial Review

  • Impeachment


The elastic clause is also known as l.jpg
The Elastic Clause is also known as is called

  • Judicial Review

  • Executive Order

  • Implied Powers Clause

  • Writ of Habeas Corpus


The case in which the nc supreme court required schools to provide an equal basic education l.jpg
The Case in which the NC Supreme Court required schools to provide an “equal basic education”

  • State v. Mann

  • Leandro v. North Carolina

  • Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg Schools

  • Baker v. Carr


State supremacy over local laws was established in the case l.jpg
State Supremacy over local laws was established in the case provide an

  • State v. Mann

  • Leandro v. North Carolina

  • Marbury v. Madison

  • McCulloch v. Maryland


National supremacy over state laws was upheld in the case involving the national bank called l.jpg
National Supremacy over State Laws was upheld in the case involving the National Bank called

  • Marbury v. Madison

  • McCulloch v. Maryland

  • State v. Mann

  • Leandro v. North Carolina


Separate but equal as a doctrine was declared unconstitutional in the case l.jpg
“Separate but Equal” as a doctrine was declared unconstitutional in the case

  • Marbury v. Madison

  • McCulloch v. Maryland

  • Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas

  • Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg Schools


Voting districts should be of equal population according to l.jpg
Voting Districts should be of equal population according to unconstitutional in the case

  • Marbury v. Madison

  • Korematsu v. United States

  • Reynolds v. Simms

  • Baker v. Carr


Gerrymandering to benefit a racial group is unconstitutional l.jpg
Gerrymandering to benefit a racial group is unconstitutional unconstitutional in the case

  • Baker v. Carr

  • Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, KS

  • Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States

  • Reynolds v. Simms


Slide12 l.jpg
The amendment that requires states to ensure equal treatment under the law and due process of the law

  • 10

  • 14

  • 22

  • 17


Slide13 l.jpg
Which right of Japanese American citizens was suspended according to the case Korematsu v. United States

  • Freedom of speech

  • Writ of Habeas Corpus

  • Freedom from a bill of attainder

  • Freedom from double jeopardy


Burning a flag as a form of symbolic speech was protected in l.jpg
Burning a flag as a form of symbolic speech was protected in according to the case

  • Texas v. Johnson

  • Tinker v. Des Moines

  • Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier

  • Gitlow v. New York


Which case protects a student s right to symbolic speech l.jpg
Which case protects a student’s right to symbolic speech? according to the case

  • Texas v. Johnson

  • Tinker v. Des Moines

  • Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier

    4. New Jersey v. TLO


Student search rights were reviewed in the case l.jpg
Student Search Rights were reviewed in the case according to the case

  • Texas v. Johnson

  • Tinker v. Des Moines

  • Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier

  • New Jersey v. TLO


According to the decision in mapp v ohio any evidence seized without a warrant l.jpg
According to the decision in Mapp v. Ohio, any evidence seized without a warrant

  • To be considered by the jury

  • To be considered by the judge

  • To be excluded from the court

  • To be held in an evidence locker for 10 years


A person s right to remain silent was extended by requiring that police explain a person s right in l.jpg
A person’s right to remain silent was extended by requiring that police explain a person’s right in

  • Mapp v. Ohio

  • New Jersey v. TLO

  • Gideon v. Wainwright

  • Miranda v. Arizona


States must appoint an attorney for those who cannot afford one according to l.jpg
States must appoint an attorney for those who cannot afford one according to

  • Mapp v. Ohio

  • New Jersey v. TLO

  • Gideon v. Wainwright

  • Miranda v. Arizona


The separation of church and state is upheld in the decision l.jpg
The “separation of church and state” is upheld in the decision

  • Tinker v. Des Moines

  • Wisconsin v. Yoder

  • Wallace v. Jaffree

  • Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier


What is hazelwood v kuhlmeier about l.jpg
What is Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier about? decision

  • Student’s right to free press

  • Use of prior restraint by a school official

  • Limited rights of students in order to protect privacy rights and a learning environment

  • All of the above


Slide22 l.jpg
When a local government placed a nativity scene on the courthouse lawn, the Supreme Court said they violated

  • Freedom of religious expression

  • Freedom from religious establishment


Freedom of religious expression includes l.jpg
Freedom of Religious Expression Includes courthouse lawn, the Supreme Court said they violated

  • Choosing one’s own faith

  • Choosing to practice religious rituals that are not harmful to others

  • Choosing to symbolically express one’s religious faith

  • All of the above


Freedom from religious establishment includes l.jpg
Freedom from Religious Establishment includes courthouse lawn, the Supreme Court said they violated

  • Government may not promote or establish a religion for the people

  • Government may not establish the religious rituals for people such as prayer time, Bible readings, holiday rituals

  • Government may not promote symbolically a religion

  • All of the above


According to lemon v kurtzman a government could give to a parochial religious school if l.jpg
According to Lemon V. Kurtzman a government could give $ to a parochial (religious) school if

  • The $ was not for a religious purpose intentionally

  • The $ would not promote a religious purpose

  • Giving the money would not cause an “excessive entanglement” between church and state

  • All of the above


In everson v board of education tax dollars spent for this did not violate the establishment clause l.jpg
In Everson v. Board of Education, tax dollars spent for this did not violate the establishment clause

  • To hire teachers in a religious school

  • To pay for religious texts in a school

  • To pay for bus fare for students to attend school

  • To pay for religious symbols in the school


Slide27 l.jpg
Forcing someone to say the pledge was found to be a violation of a person’s freedom to religious expression in

  • Abbingdon v. Schempp

  • Schenck v. United States

  • West Virginia v. Barnette

  • Alleghany v. ACLU


Slide28 l.jpg
The President’s use of “Executive Privilege” (to keep a secret) was limited by the Supreme Court Ruling in

  • U.S. v. Nixon

  • U.S. v. New York Times


The u s government s ability to use prior restraint was limited by the supreme court s ruling in l.jpg
The U.S. government’s ability to use prior restraint was limited by the Supreme Court’s ruling in

  • US v. Nixon

  • US v. New York Times


What is prior restraint l.jpg
What is prior restraint? limited by the Supreme Court’s ruling in

  • Ability of a government official to prevent something from being published

  • Ability of a government to punish someone for publishing information that violated national security (treason)


When can the government use prior restraint l.jpg
When can the government use prior restraint? limited by the Supreme Court’s ruling in

  • Whenever it wants

  • When the information to be published would harm national security


ad