better regulation expenditure forecast assessment guideline n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Better Regulation Expenditure Forecast Assessment Guideline PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Better Regulation Expenditure Forecast Assessment Guideline

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 22

Better Regulation Expenditure Forecast Assessment Guideline - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Download Presentation
Better Regulation Expenditure Forecast Assessment Guideline
An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Better Regulation Expenditure Forecast Assessment Guideline 12 February 2013

  2. Agenda

  3. Overall program and AER objectives

  4. Work program and AER Objectives • Guidelines • general techniques and information requirements • Annual reporting • monitoring of NSP efficiency • transparency of NSP performance vs expenditure • early identification of issues for network determinations • Network determinations • refine and use techniques to set allowances

  5. Expenditure assessment approach Expenditure assessment guideline Framework and Approach RINs/RIOs RINs/RIOs Benchmarking Regulatory determinations reports Work program

  6. Working group meetings • Frank and ‘off the record’ discussion – detailed minutes will not be taken, just key outcomes • Material considered by working group will be published • Not here to make decisions but consensus may be possible • Pending availability and importance of topic, may be chaired by AER board member otherwise senior AER staff • In addition to, and informed by, written submissions once received

  7. AER Experience • Current practice • Revealed cost methodology (incentive tools of economic regulation, taking historic costs as the base) • Bottom-up engineering review • Limited use of benchmarking • Limitations • Response to incentives? • Technical appraisal and information asymmetry • Data integrity

  8. AER’s objectives • Improve our approach to expenditure assessments under revised NER • Move from detailed, bottom up approach to overall reasonableness assessments • Greater focus on benchmarking • Open and transparent approach to regulation • Recognition of data limitations and forecasting error • Implementation costs have to be ‘worth it’

  9. This is the first step in a process • Benchmarking is a big step • Continual refinement as better data become available • Gradual shift from current techniques • Flexibility provided in framework and approach • Guidelines subject to future revisions

  10. Recap and discussion of issues paper

  11. Recap of issues paper Purpose • Objective – new benchmarking techniques • Principles for how to select techniques • Consultation approach (to be discussed next) • Request feedback

  12. General considerations • Assessing efficiency as well as future circumstances (forecasting) • Identification of assessment techniques • Those that have worked well • Others that are new or we wish to improve • Potential for “first pass” model and more targeted assessments • Relationship with incentive arrangements

  13. Two detailed work streams • Economic benchmarking • employs economic theory on the behaviour of firms to estimate relative efficiency and how this changes over time (TFP, DEA & SFA) • Category analysis • approach to the assessment of expenditure categories

  14. Economic benchmarking • Holistic approach • Focus on data requirements • Outputs: what are they? • Inputs: how should they be measured? • Environmental factors: what else should be taken into account?

  15. Category analysis • Categories matching factors that influence or explain costs – “driver” based approach • Focus on benchmarking and trend analysis • eg cost per connection, per km of line • Largely a continuation of existing reporting categories • New national definitions will require some change • Questions about level of detail required • Recognition of differences between NSPs • Are these quantifiable and supported by evidence? • How/ when should they be accounted for?

  16. Implementation issues • Transition from existing reporting templates • Annual reporting concurrently with determinations • Different reporting years (calendar and financial years) • Different cost allocation methods • stakeholder engagement (guideline) • NSP forecasting methodologies

  17. Break Recommence at 3pm

  18. Proposed forward work program

  19. Forward work program • Timing of workshops • How to deal with dependencies • Treatment of gas, distribution and transmission • Workshop plan for economic benchmarking • Are the three phases appropriate? Are the individual workshop topics appropriate? • Forward work program for category analysis • Are the four phases appropriate? Are the individual workshop topics appropriate?

  20. Category analysis meetings

  21. Economic benchmarking meetings

  22. Other business