1 / 10

MICE CM32 25 th February 2012 Magnet Group Report

MICE CM32 25 th February 2012 Magnet Group Report. Vicky Bayliss Victoria Blackmore John Cobb Mike Courthold Roy Preece Mike Zisman. Conclusions from CM32. Predicted fields with ferrous content . Predicted fields without ferrous content .

aldan
Download Presentation

MICE CM32 25 th February 2012 Magnet Group Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MICE CM32 25th February 2012Magnet Group Report Vicky Bayliss Victoria Blackmore John Cobb Mike Courthold Roy Preece Mike Zisman

  2. Conclusions from CM32 Predicted fieldswith ferrous content Predicted fieldswithout ferrous content • Started to identify magnetically-sensitive components within the Cooling channel volume • Used the TRD Magnetic-Shielding model to predict the magnetic field and potential shielding requirements in specific areas • Adapted the model the predict the effect of inserting significant ferrous objects into the Cooling Channel

  3. Magnet Group Tasks since CM32 • Finding solutions for Step IV • 15 compressors • Magnet control Rack • Electrical racks on the North Mezzanine extension • Considering solutions for Step VI • Understand the full extent of the shielding issues, by: • Gathering information on ferrous objects, or objects which may not operate in high fields

  4. Step VI: Compressors

  5. Step IV: Compressors

  6. Step IV: Magnet Control Racks This implies serious modifications to the positions of magnet control racks, their services and the entrance to the trench. Simplified solution shows it is possible to shield in 5mm US1010 iron and 5mm mu-metal if Aluminium racks are used. In reality, we will need to provide protected access (labyrinth or air-lock style) to allow access during magnet operation.

  7. Step IV: Electrical Racks on North Mezzanine • 4 racks located on the north mezzanine • 5mm US1010 iron and 5mm mu-metal if Aluminium racks are used. • Estimated weight 3-5 tonnes – requires major modifications to the north mezzanine

  8. Step VI Solutions • We need to consider: • Compressors moved behind the beam stop, which would still require shielding, or against the west wall • Electrical racks...??? • What else? Modelling shows that it is not reasonably possible to shield the compressors or electrical racks in their currently proposed locations.

  9. Information Gathering • What we know we need to consider: • EMR control rack • Vacuum system control racks • Power supplies for conventional magnets • Tracker system • Hydrogen system • Vacuum system • PPS system • Etc... • For every magnetically-sensitive object in the MICE hall, we need to know: • Location (X, Y and Z coordinates w.r.t. Beamline centre in Step VI) • Approximate object dimensions • Mass of any ferrous material • Sensitivity of components to magnetic fields

  10. Conclusions • Magnetic Field distortion • Previous analysis and reports overlooked massive distortion in magnetic field profile caused by presence of ferrous objects including magnetic shielding! • EG: Magnetic field in air in compressor locations ~ 30mT, which becomes 1.7T when ferrous content of cabinet and shielding taken into account. • What about a partial yoke? (Pierrick’s suggestion) • Forced to reconsider possibility of partial yoke around Cooling Channel magnets • Substantial issues re beam physics, forces, weight, and access for services and maintenance, etc. • Focusing on a Step IV solution • Will still require considerable engineering compromises & effort to achieve, as well as substantial additional analysis by Vicky & Mike

More Related