1 / 12

MEAP Scoring Workshop Fall 2007

Join the MEAP Scoring Workshop to review annotated scoring guides and participate in range-finding activities for social studies constructed responses. Explore rubric criteria, core democratic values, data interpretation, and more. Contact Ruth Isaia for details.

alanjames
Download Presentation

MEAP Scoring Workshop Fall 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fall 2007Scoring the MEAP and MMESocial Studies Constructed Response Ruth Isaia OEAA-MEAP Fall 2007

  2. Scoring Workshop Agenda 10-12pm • Review DRAFTS of Annotated Scoring Guides: Web-review currently on-line: www.mi.gov/meap • Final document to be posted to MEAP website January 2008 • Break into small groups for mock range-finding with a released high school item: ~45 minutes • Reconvene for whole group discussion

  3. What is Range Finding? A committee composed of Michigan social studies educators reads a sample of student papers to determine a “range” of scores for that prompt: • 0-3 points for 6th grade assessment • 0-4 points for 9th grade assessment • 0-5 points for 11th (mme) grade assessment

  4. Rubric Criteria by grade level

  5. Position • Clear yes or no • Support for position • Must have clear position and support to receive any further points

  6. Core Democratic Value (CDV) • Civitas curriculum • Common Good: Must mention “who sacrifices what” in order to receive the point (HS and 9th grade only) • Pursuit of Happiness: Must mention that it does not infringe on the rights of others

  7. Data • A “preponderance” of accurate and relevant data interpretation

  8. Prior Knowledge (PK) • Prior social studies knowledge (history, civics, econ, geog) • Current events-of a national or relevant local nature • Applied in such a way to support the position • Cannot “double dip” with CDV or data section

  9. Opposing Argument & Refutation • Explanation of opposing argument • How the argument is flawed

  10. Spring 2001 Released High School Item • Should the Constitution be amended to allow Congress to overturn Supreme Court decisions?

  11. Should the Constitution be amended to allow Congress to overturn Supreme Court decisions? • Paper #1: 5 points maximum • Paper #2: 0 points: No clear position • Paper #3: 1 point: Not sufficient prior knowledge to support position • Paper #4: 4 points: Did not attempt refutation

  12. Contact info • Ruth Isaia: MEAP committees and MEAP info isaiar@michgan.gov 517 335 0477 • Karen R. Todorov: Curriculum information MDE Social Studies Curriculum Consultant todorok@michigan.gov • Current Range Finders: Mike DeSantis, Theresa Miotke, Joel Erndtman, Bill Strickland, LaWanda Parker, Lori Burns, Shelley Kranz • Released items: www.mi.gov/meap

More Related