1 / 20

Biotechnology Incubators in Israel

Biotechnology Incubators in Israel. The Israeli Biotechnology Market. 160 companies (30% in therapeutics) 4000 employees Market valuation: $3.5 billion Market capitalization: $2.7 billion Av. Annual growth in no. of companies: 14% Sales: $600 million

alamea
Download Presentation

Biotechnology Incubators in Israel

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Biotechnology Incubators in Israel

  2. The Israeli Biotechnology Market • 160 companies (30% in therapeutics) • 4000 employees • Market valuation: $3.5 billion • Market capitalization: $2.7 billion • Av. Annual growth in no. of companies: 14% • Sales: $600 million • 75% of the companies employs less then 20

  3. European Biotechnology Per Country Source: E&Y

  4. The existing incubation system 3 types of bio-incubators in Israel: • Public incubators • Private incubators • Public\Private incubators – public incubators which were partly privatized

  5. The existing system of public incubators: Duration: up to 2 years Funding per project: up to $350,000 Government participation: 85% Ownership: Entrepreneur - 50% Private investors - 20% Incubator - 20% Other staff members - 10% Public Incubators

  6. Public Bio-Incubators • Many public incubators have some biotech firms • 2 public incubators specializing/half specialized in biotechnology: • Biomedical Incubator Rad-Ramot Ltd. • Naiot Technological Center Ltd. Both incubators display relatively high levels of private holdings

  7. Problems with the Public scheme • Percentage of ownership is predetermined • Inflexible terms • Duration of funding limited to 2 years • Budget per project limited to $350,000 • No shared infrastructure (not recognized as an eligible cost of the incubator)

  8. Private Initiatives in Israel • Eager Biogroup Ltd. • Hadasit Medical Research Services and Development Ltd. (Haddasa Hospital) • Clal Biotechnology Industries Ltd. • The Center for Advanced Technologies (Tel Hashomer Hospital)

  9. Eager Biogroup Ltd • Incubator ownership: private investors • Seed funding and mentoring against X% ownership (depends on the level of involvement) • Focus: IP strategy and clustering of related projects

  10. Eager Biogroup Ltd • International collaboration with the Pasteur institute in Paris and the European molecular biology labs in Heidelberg. • Average initial investment of $200,000 • Present status: 7 incubator companies

  11. Hadasit Medical Research Services and Development Ltd. • An incubator within Hadassah Hospital • Ownership: Hadassah Hospital • Entrepreneur receives up to 20% • Funding of projects: • Initial sources of funding: internal sources and Chief Scientist • In later stages external investors are sought by the incubator management team for each project • Management: highly experienced personnel • Present status: 5 companies

  12. Clal Biotechnology Industries Ltd • Ownership: Clal Investment Group • Up until 2 years ago the company only invested in mature companies: at least in phase 1. • Following a strategic decision to invest in Start-ups the incubator was established. • The incubator will house 4 portfolio companies • Shared infrastructure including clean rooms • GMP/GLP services

  13. The Center for Advanced Technologies • An incubator within Tel-Hashomer hospital • Ownership: Tel Hashomer – the state of Israel • Incubator concept: • To commercialized ideas coming from the hospital staff • To enable external entrepreneurs using the advance hospital infrastructure

  14. The Center for Advanced Technologies • 5 permanent research staff • Funding of projects: mainly from the chief scientist and from MAGNET. Some projects are funded by private investment • 6-8 projects

  15. “Most incubators tend to become specialized within biotechnology” Main causes for this: • Geographic proximity between companies leads to synergies • Management specialization • Shared infrastructure • Relevant Network

  16. The New Public Biotech Incubator Initiative

  17. Rationale • Biotech requires more time • Biotech requires more funding • Importance of shared infrastructure • Specialized management is crucial

  18. The New Bio-incubator Scheme • 2 public bio-incubators will be established • Duration: 3 years • Funding per project: $1.8 million • Government participation: • Year 1 - 85% • Year 2 - 75% • Year 3 - 65%

  19. The New Bio-incubator Scheme • Shared infrastructure (50% public participation) • Specialized in-house auxiliary services • Involvement of multinational pharma company • Involvement of leading VC • Strong emphasize on management

  20. Bio-Link project • EC funded project within FP5 • Two main objectives: • Information exchange and networking • Stettin and validating a Co-incubation model

More Related