1.32k likes | 1.45k Views
This week’s highlight from the International Association of Risk and Compliance Professionals (IARCP) focuses on innovative ways to explain liquidity risk management utilizing pollution-mitigating technology analogies. By comparing liquidity services to energy output and high-quality liquid assets to scrubbers, we can better understand regulatory impacts on financial systems. The discussion includes insights from Federal Reserve Board member Jeremy C. Stein on optimal regulatory strategies to handle uncertainties in cost mitigation, enhancing our comprehension of liquidity coverage ratios.
E N D
P age |1 InternationalAssociationofRiskandCompliance Professionals(IARCP) 1200GStreetNWSuite800Washington, DC20005-6705USATel:202-449-9750www.risk-compliance-association.com Top10riskandcompliancemanagementrelatednewsstoriesandworldeventsthat(forbetterorforworse)shapedthe week'sagenda,andwhatisnext DearMember, Ihadadifficulttimeinthepasttoexplainliquidityriskmanagementandratios. NowIknowwhattodo.Problemsolved! Iwilluseapollution-mitigatingtechnology,likescrubberstoexplainliquidityrisk. Mr.JeremyCStein,MemberoftheBoardofGovernorsoftheFederalReserveSystemexplainedhow: “Supposewehaveapowerplantthatproducesenergyand,asabyproduct,somepollution. Supposefurtherthatregulatorswanttoreducethepollutionandhavetwotoolsattheirdisposal: Theycanmandatetheuseofapollution-mitigatingtechnology,likescrubbers,ortheycanlevyataxontheamountofpollutiongeneratedbytheplant. Inanidealworld,regulationwouldaccomplishtwoobjectives. First,itwouldleadtoanoptimallevelofmitigation–thatis,itwouldinducetheplanttoinstallscrubbersuptothepointwherethecostofan InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |2 additionalscrubberisequaltothemarginalsocialbenefit,intermsof reducedpollution. And,second,itwouldalsopromoteconservation: Giventhatthescrubbersdon’tgetridofpollutionentirely,onealsowantstoreduceoverallenergyconsumptionbymakingitmoreexpensive. Asimplecaseisoneinwhichthecostsofinstallingscrubbers,aswellasthesocialbenefitsofreducedpollution,areknowninadvancebytheregulatorandthemanagerofthepowerplant. Inthiscase,theregulatorcanfigureoutwhattherightnumberofscrubbersisandrequirethattheplantinstallthesescrubbers. Themandatecanthereforepreciselytargettheoptimalamountofmitigationperunitofenergyproduced. And,totheextentthatthescrubbersarecostly,themandatewillalsoleadtohigherenergyprices,whichwillencouragesomeconservation,though perhapsnotthesociallyoptimallevel. Thislattereffectistheimplicittaxaspectofthemandate. Amorecomplicatedcaseiswhentheregulatordoesnotknowaheadoftimewhatthecostsofbuildingandinstallingscrubberswillbe. Here,mandatingtheuseofafixednumberofscrubbersispotentiallyproblematic: Ifthescrubbersturnouttobeveryexpensive,theregulationwillendup beingmoreaggressivethansociallydesirable,leadingtooverinvestment inscrubbersandlargecostincreasesforconsumers;however,ifthe scrubbersturnouttobecheaperthanexpected,theregulationwillhavebeentoosoft. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |3 Inotherwords,whenthecostofthemitigationtechnologyissignificantlyuncertain,aregulatoryapproachthatfixesthequantityofmitigationisequivalenttoonewheretheimplicittaxratebouncesaroundalot. Bycontrast,aregulatoryapproachthatfixesthepriceofpollutioninsteadofthequantity–say,byimposingapredeterminedproportionaltaxratedirectlyontheamountofpollutionemittedbytheplant–ismoreforgivinginthefaceofthiskindofuncertainty. Thisapproachleavesthescrubber-installationdecisiontothemanageroftheplant,whocanfigureoutwhatthescrubberscostbeforedecidinghowtoproceed. Forexample,ifthescrubbersturnouttobeunexpectedlyexpensive,theplantmanagercaninstallfewerofthem. Thisflexibilitytranslatesintolessvariabilityintheeffectiveregulatoryburdenandhencelessvariabilityinthepriceofenergytoconsumers. Scrubbersandhigh-qualityliquidassets WhatdoesallthisimplyforthedesignoftheLCR?Let’sworkthroughtheanalogyindetail. Theanalogtothepowerplant’senergyoutputisthegrossamountofliquidityservicescreatedbyabank–viaitsdeposits,thecreditlinesitprovidestoitscustomers,theprimebrokerageservicesitoffers,andsoforth. Theanalogtothemitigationtechnology–thescrubbers–isthestockofHQLAthatthebankholds. Andtheanalogtopollutionisthenetliquidityriskassociatedwiththedifferencebetweenthesetwoquantities,somethingakintotheLCRshortfall. Thatis,whenthebankoffersalotofliquidityondemandtoitscustomers InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |4 butfailstoholdanadequatebufferofHQLA,thisiswhenitimposesspillovercostsontherestofthefinancialsystem. Inthecaseofthepowerplant,Iarguedthataregulationthatcallsforafixedquantityofmitigation–thatis,forafixednumberofscrubbers–ismoreattractivewhenthereislittleuncertaintyaboutthecostofthese scrubbers.” ThankyouJeremy! Ihavejustopenedmymasterplan.Ihavetolearnmoreaboutscrubbers.InowseeothersimilaritiesbetweentheBISandscrubbers.OnlynowIcanunderstandtheshapeoftheBISbuilding! IthinkIhavejustfoundanotherregulatoryarbitrageopportunity.Arealnationaldiscretion,justified. Scrubbersarecapableofreductionefficienciesintherangeof50%to98%.WhyshouldtheLiquidityCoverageRatiobe100%? ALCRfrom50%to98%(meaning50,001%)isgoodenough! InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |5 ThecalculationsinBaselandscrubbersarealsoalmostthesame! ReadmoreatNumber1below. WelcometotheTop10list. BestRegards, GeorgeLekatisPresidentoftheIARCP GeneralManager,ComplianceLLC 1200GStreetNWSuite800, WashingtonDC20005,USA Tel:(202)449-9750 Email:lekatis@risk-compliance-association.com Web:www.risk-compliance-association.com HQ:1220N.MarketStreetSuite804,WilmingtonDE19801,USA Tel:(302)342-8828 InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |6 Liquidityregulationandcentralbanking SpeechbyMrJeremyCStein,MemberoftheBoardofGovernorsoftheFederalReserveSystem,atthe“Findingtherightbalance”2013CreditMarketsSymposium,sponsoredbytheFederalReserveBankofRichmond,Charlotte,NorthCarolina BaselIIICapital:AWell-IntendedIllusion ThomasM.Hoenig,ViceChairman,FederalDepositInsuranceCorporation,InternationalAssociationofDepositInsurers,2013ResearchConference,Basel, Switzerland “Aristotleiscreditedwithbeingthefirstphilosophertosystematicallystudylogicalfallacies,whichhedefinedasargumentsthatappearvalidbut,infact,arenot. Icallthemwell-intendedillusions. OnesuchillusionofprecisionistheBaselcapitalstandardsinwhichworldsupervisoryauthoritiesrelyprincipallyonaTier1capitalratiotojudgetheadequacyofbankcapitalandbalancesheetstrength.” PCAOBIssuesPolicyStatementonExtraordinaryCooperationinConnectionwithBoardInvestigationsWashington,DC InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |7 ThePublicCompanyAccountingOversightBoardtodaypublishedaformalstatementconcerningthebenefitsthatmaybeavailabletoregisteredpublicaccountingfirmsandindividualswhoprovideextraordinarycooperationinPCAOBinvestigations. SolvencyII:wherearewenow? AlthoughthereisnocertaintyontheSolvencyIIimplementationdate,EUpolicymakersarecontinuingtofinalisekeyaspectsoftheframework. PolicyStatementConductingstatutoryinvestigations ThePrudentialRegulationAuthority(PRA)isrequired,undertheFinancialServicesAct2012(theAct),toinvestigateandreporttoHMTreasuryonpossibleregulatoryfailureandmattersofpublicinterest. Commissionreportunderlinesimportanceandurgencyoffinancialsectorreformsasabasistorestorelong-termgrowth TheEuropeanCommissionispublishingtodaytheEuropeanFinancialStabilityandIntegrationReport(EFSIR),whichisbeingpresentedatajointconferencewiththeEuropeanCentralBank(ECB)inBrussels. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |8 Statementonthe2013PCAOBAcademicConference JeanetteM.Franzel,BoardMember2013PCAOBAcademicConferenceWashington,D.C. TheimportanceofcultureindrivingbehavioursoffirmsandhowtheFCAwillassessthis SpeechbyCliveAdamson,DirectorofSupervisionattheCFASociety-UKProfessionalismConference19April2013,London. LessonsforSouthAfricafromGermanyinachallengingglobalenvironment AddressbyMsGillMarcus,GovernoroftheSouthAfricanReserveBank,attheSouthern African-GermanChamberofCommerceandIndustryluncheon,Johannesburg Thejourneyoffinancialreform AddressbyMrPhilipLowe,DeputyGovernoroftheReserveBankofAustralia,tothe AustralianChamberofCommerceinShanghai. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |9 Liquidityregulationandcentralbanking SpeechbyMrJeremyCStein,MemberoftheBoardofGovernorsoftheFederalReserveSystem,atthe“Findingtherightbalance”2013CreditMarketsSymposium,sponsoredbytheFederalReserveBankofRichmond,Charlotte,NorthCarolina I’dliketotalktodayaboutoneimportantelementoftheinternationalregulatoryreformagenda–namely,liquidityregulation. Liquidityregulationisarelativelynew,post-crisisadditiontothefinancialstabilitytoolkit. KeyelementsincludetheLiquidityCoverageRatio(LCR),whichwasrecentlyfinalizedbytheBaselCommitteeonBankingSupervision,andtheNetStableFundingRatio,whichisstillaworkinprogress. Inwhatfollows,IwillfocusontheLCR. ThestatedgoaloftheLCRisstraightforward,evenifsomeaspectsofitsdesignarelessso. InthewordsoftheBaselCommittee,“TheobjectiveoftheLCRistopromotetheshort-termresilienceoftheliquidityriskprofileofbanks. Itdoesthisbyensuringthatbankshaveanadequatestockofunencumberedhigh-qualityliquidassets(HQLA)thatcanbeconvertedeasilyandimmediatelyinprivatemarketsintocashtomeettheirliquidityneedsfora30calendardayliquiditystressscenario.” Inotherwords,eachbankisrequiredtomodelitstotaloutflowsover30daysinaliquiditystresseventandthentoholdHQLAsufficientto InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |10 accommodatethoseoutflows. Thisrequirementisimplementedwitharatiotest,wheremodeledoutflowsgointhedenominatorandthestockofHQLAgoesinthenumerator;whentheratioequalsorexceeds100percent,therequirementissatisfied. TheBaselCommitteeissuedthefirstversionoftheLCRinDecember2010. InJanuaryofthisyear,thecommitteeissuedarevisedfinalversionoftheLCR,followinganendorsementbyitsgoverningbody,theGroupofGovernorsandHeadsofSupervision(GHOS). TherevisionexpandstherangeofassetsthatcancountasHQLAandalsoadjustssomeoftheassumptionsthatgovernthemodelingofnetoutflowsinastressscenario. Inaddition,thecommitteeagreedinJanuarytoagradualphase-inoftheLCR,sothatitonlybecomesfullyeffectiveonaninternationalbasisinJanuary2019. Onthedomesticfront,theFederalReserveexpectsthattheU.S.bankingagencieswillissueaproposallaterthisyeartoimplementtheLCRforlargeU.S.bankingfirms. Whilethisprogressiswelcome,anumberofquestionsremain. First,towhatextentshouldaccesstoliquidityfromacentralbankbeallowedtocounttowardsatisfyingtheLCR? InJanuary,theGHOSnotedthattheinteractionbetweentheLCRandtheprovisionofcentralbankfacilitiesiscriticallyimportant. AndthegroupinstructedtheBaselCommitteetocontinueworkingonthisissuein2013. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |11 Second,whatstepsshouldbetakentoenhancetheusabilityoftheLCRbuffer–thatis,toencouragebankstoactuallydrawdowntheirHQLAbuffers,asopposedtofire-sellingotherlessliquidassets? TheGHOShasalsomadeclearitsviewthat,duringperiodsofstress,itwouldbeappropriateforbankstousetheirHQLA,therebyfallingbelowtheminimum. However,creatingaregimeinwhichbanksvoluntarilychoosetodosoisnotaneasytask. AnumberofobservershaveexpressedtheconcernthatifabankisheldtoanLCRstandardof100percentinnormaltimes,itmaybereluctanttoallowitsratiotodropbelow100percentwhenfacinglargeoutflows,evenifregulatorsweretopermitthistemporarydeviation,forfearthatadeclineintheratiocouldbeinterpretedasasignofweakness. Myaimhereistosketchaframeworkforthinkingabouttheseandrelatedissues. Amongthem,theinterplaybetweentheLCRandcentralbankliquidityprovisionisperhapsthemostfundamentalandanaturalstartingpointfordiscussion. Bywayofmotivation,notethatbeforethefinancialcrisis,wehadahighlydevelopedregimeofcapitalregulationforbanks–albeitonethatlooksinadequateinretrospect–butwedidnothaveformalregulatorystandardsfortheirliquidity. Theintroductionofliquidityregulationafterthecrisiscanbethoughtofasreflectingadesiretoreducedependenceonthecentralbankasalenderoflastresort(LOLR),basedonthelessonslearnedoverthepreviousseveralyears. However,totheextentthatsomerolefortheLOLRstillremains,onenowfacesthequestionofhowitshouldcoexistwitharegimeofliquidityregulation. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |12 Toaddressthisquestion,itisusefultotakeastepbackandaskanotherone: Whatunderlyingmarketfailureisliquidityregulationintendedtoaddress,andwhycan’tthismarketfailurebehandledentirelybyanLOLR? Iwillturntothisquestionfirst. Next,Iwillconsiderdifferentmechanismsthatcouldpotentiallyachievethegoalsofliquidityregulation,andhowthesemechanismsrelatetovariousfeaturesoftheLCR. Insodoing,Ihopetoillustratewhy,eventhoughliquidityregulationisaclosecousinofcapitalregulation,itneverthelesspresentsanumberofnovelchallengesforpolicymakersandwhy,asaresult,wearegoingtohavetobeopentolearningandadaptingaswego. Thecaseforliquidityregulation Oneoftheprimaryeconomicfunctionsofbanksandotherfinancialintermediaries,suchasbroker-dealers,istoprovideliquidity–thatis,cashondemand–invariousformstotheircustomers. Someofthisliquidityprovisionhappensontheliabilitysideofthebalancesheet,withbankdemanddepositsbeingaleadingexample. But,importantly,banksalsoprovideliquidityviacommittedlinesof credit. Indeed,itisprobablynotacoincidencethatthesetwoproducts–demand depositsandcreditlines–areofferedundertheroofofthesameinstitution;theunderlyingcommonalityisthatbothrequireanabilitytoaccommodateunpredictablerequestsforcashonshortnotice. Anumberofotherfinancialintermediaryservices,suchasprimebrokerage,alsoembodyasignificantelementofliquidityprovision.Withoutquestion,theseliquidity-provisionservicesaresociallyvaluable. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |13 Ontheliabilityside,demanddepositsandothershort-termbankliabilitiesaresafe,easy-to-valueclaimsthatarewellsuitedfortransaction purposesandhencecreateaflowofmoney-likebenefitsfortheirholders. Andloancommitmentsaremoreefficientthananarrangementinwhicheachoperatingfirmhedgesitsfutureuncertainneedsby“pre-borrowing”andhoardingtheproceedsonitsownbalancesheet;thislatterapproach doesapoorjobofeconomizingonthescarceaggregatesupplyofliquidassets. Atthesametime,asthefinancialcrisismadepainfullyclear,thebusinessofliquidityprovisioninevitablyexposesfinancialintermediariestovariousformsofrunrisk. Thatis,inresponsetoadverseevents,theirfragilefundingstructures,togetherwiththebindingliquiditycommitmentstheyhavemade,canresultinrapidoutflowsthat,absentcentralbankintervention,leadbankstofire-sellilliquidassetsor,inamoreseverecase,tofailaltogether. Andfiresalesandbankfailures–andtheaccompanyingcontractionsincreditavailability–canhavespillovereffectstootherfinancialinstitutionsandtotheeconomyasawhole. Thus,whilebankswillnaturallyholdbufferstocksofliquidassetstohandleunanticipatedoutflows,theymaynotholdenoughbecause,althoughtheybearallthecostsofthisbufferstocking,theydonotcaptureallofthesocialbenefits,intermsofenhancedfinancialstabilityandlowercoststotaxpayersintheeventoffailure. Itisthisexternalitythatcreatesaroleforpolicy. Therearetwobroadtypesofpolicytoolsavailabletodealwiththissortofliquidity-basedmarketfailure. Thefirstisafter-the-factintervention,eitherbyadepositinsurerguaranteeingsomeofthebank’sliabilitiesorbyacentralbankactingasanLOLR. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |14 Thesecondtypeisliquidityregulation. Asanexampleoftheformer,whentheeconomyisinabadstate,assumingthataparticularbankisnotinsolvent,thecentralbankcanlendagainstilliquidassetsthatwouldotherwisebefire-sold,therebydampingoreliminatingtherundynamicsandhelpingreducetheincidenceofbankfailure. Inmuchoftheliteratureonbanking,suchinterventionsareseenasthe primarymethodfordealingwithrun-likeliquidityproblems. Aclassicstatementofthecentralbank’sroleasanLOLRisWalterBagehot’s1873bookLombardStreet. Morerecently,theseminaltheoreticaltreatmentofthisissueisbyDouglasDiamondandPhilipDybvig,whoshowthatundercertaincircumstances,theuseofdepositinsuranceoranLOLRcaneliminaterunriskaltogether,therebyincreasingsocialwelfareatzerocost. Tobeclear,thisworkassumesthatthebankinquestionisfundamentallysolvent,meaningthatwhileitsassetsmaynotbeliquidonshortnotice,thelong-runvalueoftheseassetsisknownwithcertaintytoexceedthevalueofthebank’sliabilities. Onewaytointerpretthemessageofthisresearchisthatcapitalregulationisimportanttoensuresolvency,butonceareliableregimeof capitalregulationisinplace,liquidityproblemscanbedealtwithafterthefact,viasomecombinationofdepositinsuranceanduseoftheLOLR. ItfollowsthatifoneisgoingtomakeanargumentinfavorofaddingpreventativeliquidityregulationsuchastheLCRontopofcapitalregulation,acentralpremisemustbethattheuseofLOLRcapacityinacrisisscenarioissociallycostly,sothatitisanexplicitobjectiveofpolicytoeconomizeonitsuseinsuchcircumstances. Ithinkthispremiseisasensibleone. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |15 Akeypointinthisregard–andonethathasbeenreinforcedbytheexperienceofthepastseveralyears–isthatthelinebetweenilliquidityandinsolvencyisfarblurrierinreallifethanitissometimesassumedtobeintheory. Indeed,onemightarguethatabankorbrokerdealerthatexperiencesaliquiditycrunchmusthavesomeprobabilityofhavingsolvencyproblemsaswell;otherwise,itishardtoseewhyitcouldnotattractshort-termfundingfromtheprivatemarket. ThisreasoningimpliesthatwhenthecentralbankactsasanLOLRinacrisis,itnecessarilytakesonsomeamountofcreditrisk. Andifitexperienceslosses,theselossesultimatelyfallontheshouldersoftaxpayers. Moreover,theuseofanLOLRtosupportbankswhentheygetintotroublecanleadtomoralhazardproblems,inthesensethatbanksmaybelessprudentexante. IfitwerenotforthesecostsofusingLOLRcapacity,theproblemwouldbetrivial,andtherewouldbenoneedforliquidityregulation: Assumingawell-functioningcapital-regulationregime,thecentralbankcouldalwaysavertallfiresalesandbankfailuresexpost,simplybyactingasanLOLR. Thisobservationcarriesanimmediateimplication: Itmakesnosensetoallowunpricedaccesstothecentralbank’sLOLRcapacitytocounttowardanLCRrequirement. Again,thewholepointofliquidityregulationmustbeeithertoconserveontheuseoftheLOLRorinthelimit,toaddresssituationswheretheLOLRisnotavailableatall–as,forexample,inthecaseof broker-dealersintheUnitedStates. Atthesametime,itisimportanttodrawadistinctionbetweenpricedand unpricedaccesstotheLOLR. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |16 Forexample,takethecaseofAustralia,whereprudentfiscalpolicyhasledtoarelativelysmallstockofgovernmentdebtoutstandingandhencetoapotentialshortageofHQLA. TheBaselCommitteehasagreedtotheusebyAustraliaofaCommittedLiquidityFacility(CLF),wherebyanAustralianbankcanpaytheReserveBankofAustraliaanupfrontfeeforwhatiseffectivelyaloancommitment,andthisloancommitmentcanthenbecountedtowarditsHQLA. IncontrasttofreeaccesstotheLOLR,thisapproachisnotatoddswiththegoalsofliquidityregulationbecausetheup-frontfeeiseffectivelyataxthatservestodeterrelianceontheLOLR–which,again,ispreciselytheultimategoal. IwillreturntotheideaofaCLFshortly. Thedesignofregulation Onceithasbeendecidedthatliquidityregulationisdesirable,thenextquestionishowbesttoimplementit. Inthiscontext,notethattheLCRhastwologicallydistinctaspectsasaregulatorytool: Itisamitigator,inthesensethatholdingliquidassetsleadstoabetteroutcomeifthereisabadshock;itisalsoanimplicittaxonliquidityprovisionbybanks,totheextentthatholdingliquidassetsiscostly. Ofcourse,onecansaysomethingbroadlysimilaraboutcapitalrequirements. ButtheimplicittaxassociatedwiththeLCRissubtlerandlesswell understood,soIwillgointosomedetailhere. Ananalogymayhelptoexplain. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |17 Supposewehaveapowerplantthatproducesenergyand,asabyproduct,somepollution. Supposefurtherthatregulatorswanttoreducethepollutionandhavetwotoolsattheirdisposal: Theycanmandatetheuseofapollution-mitigatingtechnology,likescrubbers,ortheycanlevyataxontheamountofpollutiongeneratedbytheplant. Inanidealworld,regulationwouldaccomplishtwoobjectives. First,itwouldleadtoanoptimallevelofmitigation–thatis,itwouldinducetheplanttoinstallscrubbersuptothepointwherethecostofanadditionalscrubberisequaltothemarginalsocialbenefit,intermsof reducedpollution. And,second,itwouldalsopromoteconservation: Giventhatthescrubbersdon’tgetridofpollutionentirely,onealsowantstoreduceoverallenergyconsumptionbymakingitmoreexpensive. Asimplecaseisoneinwhichthecostsofinstallingscrubbers,aswellasthesocialbenefitsofreducedpollution,areknowninadvancebytheregulatorandthemanagerofthepowerplant. Inthiscase,theregulatorcanfigureoutwhattherightnumberofscrubbersisandrequirethattheplantinstallthesescrubbers. Themandatecanthereforepreciselytargettheoptimalamountofmitigationperunitofenergyproduced. And,totheextentthatthescrubbersarecostly,themandatewillalsoleadtohigherenergyprices,whichwillencouragesomeconservation,though perhapsnotthesociallyoptimallevel. Thislattereffectistheimplicittaxaspectofthemandate. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |18 Amorecomplicatedcaseiswhentheregulatordoesnotknowaheadoftimewhatthecostsofbuildingandinstallingscrubberswillbe. Here,mandatingtheuseofafixednumberofscrubbersispotentiallyproblematic: Ifthescrubbersturnouttobeveryexpensive,theregulationwillendup beingmoreaggressivethansociallydesirable,leadingtooverinvestment inscrubbersandlargecostincreasesforconsumers;however,ifthe scrubbersturnouttobecheaperthanexpected,theregulationwillhavebeentoosoft. Inotherwords,whenthecostofthemitigationtechnologyissignificantlyuncertain,aregulatoryapproachthatfixesthequantityofmitigationisequivalenttoonewheretheimplicittaxratebouncesaroundalot. Bycontrast,aregulatoryapproachthatfixesthepriceofpollutioninsteadofthequantity–say,byimposingapredeterminedproportionaltaxratedirectlyontheamountofpollutionemittedbytheplant–ismoreforgivinginthefaceofthiskindofuncertainty. Thisapproachleavesthescrubber-installationdecisiontothemanageroftheplant,whocanfigureoutwhatthescrubberscostbeforedecidinghowtoproceed. Forexample,ifthescrubbersturnouttobeunexpectedlyexpensive,theplantmanagercaninstallfewerofthem. Thisflexibilitytranslatesintolessvariabilityintheeffectiveregulatoryburdenandhencelessvariabilityinthepriceofenergytoconsumers. Scrubbersandhigh-qualityliquidassets WhatdoesallthisimplyforthedesignoftheLCR?Let’sworkthroughtheanalogyindetail. Theanalogtothepowerplant’senergyoutputisthegrossamountofliquidityservicescreatedbyabank–viaitsdeposits,thecreditlinesit InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |19 providestoitscustomers,theprimebrokerageservicesitoffers,andsoforth. Theanalogtothemitigationtechnology–thescrubbers–isthestockofHQLAthatthebankholds. Andtheanalogtopollutionisthenetliquidityriskassociatedwiththedifferencebetweenthesetwoquantities,somethingakintotheLCRshortfall. Thatis,whenthebankoffersalotofliquidityondemandtoitscustomersbutfailstoholdanadequatebufferofHQLA,thisiswhenitimposesspillovercostsontherestofthefinancialsystem. Inthecaseofthepowerplant,Iarguedthataregulationthatcallsforafixedquantityofmitigation–thatis,forafixednumberofscrubbers–ismoreattractivewhenthereislittleuncertaintyaboutthecostofthese scrubbers. InthecontextoftheLCR,thecostofmitigationisthepremiumthatthebankmustpay–intheformofreducedinterestincome–foritsstockofHQLA. And,crucially,thisHQLApremiumisdeterminedinmarketequilibriumanddependsonthetotalsupplyofsafeassetsinthesystem,relativetothedemandforthoseassets. Ontheonehand,ifsafeHQLA-eligibleassetsareinamplesupply,thepremiumislikelytobelowandstable. Ontheotherhand,ifHQLA-eligibleassetsarescarce,thepremiumwillbebothhigherandmorevolatileovertime. ThislattersituationistheonefacingcountrieslikeAustralia,where,asInotedearlier,thestockofoutstandinggovernmentsecuritiesisrelativelysmall. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |20 Anditexplainswhy,forsuchcountries,havingaprice-basedmechanismaspartoftheirimplementationoftheLCRcanbemoreappealingthan purerelianceonaquantitymandate. Whenonesetsanup-frontfeeforaCLF,oneeffectivelycapstheimplicit taxassociatedwithliquidityregulationatthelevelofthecommitmentfeeandtampsdowntheundesirablevolatilitythatwouldotherwisearisefromanentirelyquantity-basedregime. Moreover,itbearsreemphasizingthathavingaCLFwithanup-frontfeeisverydifferentfromsimplyallowingbankstocountcentral-bank-eligiblecollateralasHQLAatnocharge. Rather,theCLFislikethepollutiontax. Foreverydollarofpre-CLFshortfall–thatis,foreverydollarofrequiredliquiditythatabankcan’tobtainontheprivatemarket–thebankhastopaythecommitmentfee. Soevenifthereisnotasmuchmitigation,thereisstillanincentivefor conservation,inthesensethatbanksareencouragedtodolessliquidityprovision,allelsebeingequal. ThiswouldnotbethecaseiftheCLFwereavailableatazeroprice.Whataboutthesituationincountrieswheresafeassetsaremore plentiful? TheanalysisherehasanumberofmovingpartsbecauseinadditiontotheimplementationoftheLCR,substantialincreasesindemandforsafeassetswillarisefromnewmarginrequirementsforbothclearedand nonclearedderivatives. Nevertheless,giventhelargeandgrowingglobalsupplyofsovereigndebtsecurities,aswellasotherHQLA-eligibleassets,mostestimatessuggest thatthescarcityproblemshouldbemanageable,atleastfortheforeseeablefuture. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |21 Inparticular,quantitativeimpactstudiesreleasedbytheBaselCommitteeestimatethattheworldwideincrementaldemandforHQLAcomingfromboththeimplementationoftheLCRandswapmarginrequirementsmightbeontheorderof$3trillion. Thisisalargenumber,butitcompareswithaglobalsupplyofHQLA-eligibleassetsofmorethan$40trillion. Moreover,theeligiblecollateralforswapmarginisproposedtobebroaderthantheLCR’sdefinitionofHQLA–including,forexample, certainequitiesandcorporatebondswithoutanycap. IfonefocusesjustonU.S.institutions,theincrementaldemandnumberisontheorderof$1trillion,whilethesumofTreasury,agency,andagencymortgage-backedsecuritiesismorethan$19trillion. Whilethissortofanalysisissuperficiallyreassuring,thefactremainsthat theHQLApremiumwilldependonmarket-equilibriumconsiderationsthatarehardtofullyfathominadvance,andthatarelikelytovaryovertime. Thisuncertaintyneedstobeunderstood,andrespected. Indeed,themarket-equilibriumaspectoftheproblemrepresentsacrucialdistinctionbetweencapitalregulationandliquidityregulation,anditisonereasonwhythelatterisparticularlychallengingtoimplement. Althoughcapitalregulationalsoimposesataxonbanks–totheextent thatequityisamoreexpensiveformoffinancethandebt–thistaxwedgeis,toafirstapproximation,afixedconstantforagivenbank,independentofthescaleofoverallfinancialintermediationactivity. IfBankAdecidestoissuemoreequitysoitcanexpanditslendingbusiness,thisneednotmakeitmoreexpensiveforBankBtosatisfyitscapitalrequirement. Inotherwords,thereisnoscarcityproblemwithrespecttobankequity–bothAandBcanalwaysmakemore. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |22 Bycontrast,thetotalsupplyofHQLAisclosertobeingfixedatanypoint intime. Policyimplications Whatdoesallofthisimplyforpolicydesign? First,atabroadphilosophicallevel,therecognitionthatliquidityregulationinvolvesmoreuncertaintyaboutcoststhancapitalregulationsuggeststhatevenapolicymakerwithaverystrictattitudetowardcapitalmightfinditsensibletobesomewhatmoremoderateandflexiblewithrespecttoliquidity. Thispointisreinforcedbytheobservationthatwhenaninstitutionisshortofcapitalandcan’tgetmoreontheprivatemarket,thereisreallynobackupplan,shortofresolution. Bycontrast,asImentionedearlier,whenaninstitutionisshortofliquidity,policymakersdohaveabackupplanintheformoftheLOLRfacility. Onedoesnotwanttorelytoomuchonthatbackupplan,butitspresenceshouldneverthelessfactorintothedesignofliquidityregulation. Second,inthespiritofflexibility,whileaprice-basedmechanismsuchastheCLFmaynotbeimmediatelynecessaryincountriesoutsideofAustraliaandafewothers,itisworthkeepinganopenmindaboutthemorewidespreaduseofCLF-likemechanisms. IfascarcityofHQLA-eligibleassetsturnsouttobemoreofaproblemthanweexpect,somethingalongthoselineshasthepotentialtobeausefulsafetyvalve,asitputsacaponthecostofliquidityregulation. Suchasafetyvalvewouldhaveadirecteconomicbenefit,inthesenseofpreventingtheburdenofregulationfromgettingundulyheavyinanyonecountry. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |23 Perhapsjustasimportant,asafetyvalvemightalsohelptoprotecttheintegrityoftheregulationitself,byharmonizingcostsacrosscountriesandtherebyreducingthetemptationofthosemosthard-hitbytherulestotrytochipawayatthem. Withoutsuchasafetyvalve,itispossiblethatsomecountries–thosewithrelativelysmallsuppliesofdomesticHQLA–willfindtheregulationconsiderablymorecostlythanothers. Ifso,itwouldbenaturalforthemtolobbytodilutetherules–for example,byarguingforanexpansioninthetypeofassetsthatcancountasHQLA. Takentoofar,thissortofdilutionwouldunderminetheefficacyoftheregulationasbothamitigatorandatax. Inthisscenario,holdingthelinewithwhatamountstoaproportionaltaxonliquidityprovisionwouldbeabetteroutcome. Onesituationwhereliquidassetscanbecomeunusuallyscarceisduringafinancialcrisis. Consequently,evenifCLFswerenotcountedtowardtheLCRinnormaltimes,itmightbeappropriatetocountthemduringacrisis. Indeed,whiletheLCRrequiresbankstoholdsufficientliquidassetsingoodtimestomeettheiroutflowsinagivenstressscenario,itimplicitlyrecognizesthatifthingsturnoutevenworsethanthatscenario,centralbankliquiditysupportwillbeneeded. AllowingCLFstocounttowardtheLCRinsuchcircumstanceswouldacknowledgetheimportanceofaccesstothecentralbank,andthisaccesscouldbepricedaccordingly. Finally,aprice-basedmechanismmightalsohelppromoteawillingnessofbankstodrawdowntheirsupplyofHQLAinastressscenario. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |24 AsInotedattheoutset,oneimportantconcernaboutapurequantity-basedsystemofregulationisthatifabankisheldtoanLCRstandardof100percentinnormaltimes,itmaybereluctanttoallowitsratiotofallbelow100percentwhenfacinglargeoutflowsforfearthatdoingsomightbeseenbymarketparticipantsasasignofweakness. Bycontrast,inasystemwithsomethinglikeaCLF,abankmightin normaltimesmeet95percentofitsrequirementbyholding private-marketHQLAandtheremaining5percentwithcommittedcreditlinesfromthecentralbank,soitwouldhaveanLCRofexactly100 percent. Then,whenhitwithlargeoutflows,itcouldmaintainitsLCRat100percent,butdosobyincreasingitsuseofcentralbankcreditlinesto25percentandselling20percentofitsotherliquidassets. Thisscenariowouldbethesortofliquid-assetdrawdownthatonewouldideallyliketoseeinastresssituation. Moreover,thecentralbankcouldencouragethisdrawdownbyvaryingthepricingofitscreditlines–specifically,byreducingthepriceofthelinesinthemidstofaliquiditycrisis. Suchanapproachwouldamounttotaxingliquidityprovisionmoreingoodtimesthaninbad,whichhasastabilizingmacroprudentialeffect. ThisexamplealsosuggestsadesignthatmayhaveappealinjurisdictionswherethereisarelativelyabundantsupplyofHQLA-eligibleassets. OnecanimaginecalibratingthepricingoftheCLFsoastoensurethatlinesprovidedbycentralbanksmakeuponlyaminimalfractionofbanks’requiredHQLAinnormaltimes–apart,perhaps,fromtheoccasional adjustmentperiodafteranindividualbankishitwithanidiosyncraticliquidityshortfall. Atthesametime,inastressscenario,whenliquidityisscarceandthereisupwardpressureontheHQLApremium,thepricingoftheCLFcouldbe InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |25 adjustedsoastorelievethispressureandpromoteusabilityoftheHQLAbuffer. SuchanapproachwouldrespectthepolicyobjectiveofreducingexpectedrelianceontheLOLRwhileatthesametimeallowingforasafetyvalveinaperiodofstress. ThelimitcaseofthisapproachisonewheretheCLFcountstowardtheLCRonlyinacrisis. Conclusion Bywayofconclusion,letmejustrestatethatliquidityregulationhasakey roletoplayinimprovingfinancialstability. However,weshouldavoidthinkingaboutitinisolation;rather,wecanbestunderstanditaspartofalargertoolkitthatalsoincludescapitalregulationand,importantly,thecentralbank’sLOLRfunction. Therefore,properdesignandimplementationofliquidityregulationssuchastheLCRshouldtakeaccountoftheseinterdependencies. Inparticular,policymakersshouldaimtostrikeabalancebetweenreducingrelianceontheLOLRontheonehandandmoderatingthecostscreatedbyliquidityshortagesontheotherhand–especiallythoseshortagesthatcropupintimesofseveremarketstrain. And,asalways,weshouldbepreparedtolearnfromexperienceaswego. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |26 BaselIIICapital:AWell-IntendedIllusionThomasM.Hoenig ViceChairman,FederalDepositInsuranceCorporation InternationalAssociationofDepositInsurers2013ResearchConference,Basel,Switzerland Introduction Aristotleiscreditedwithbeingthefirstphilosophertosystematicallystudylogical fallacies,whichhedefinedasargumentsthatappearvalidbut,infact,are not. Icallthemwell-intendedillusions. OnesuchillusionofprecisionistheBaselcapitalstandardsinwhichworldsupervisoryauthoritiesrelyprincipallyonaTier1capitalratiotojudgetheadequacyofbankcapitalandbalancesheetstrength. Forthelargestofthesefirms,eachdollarofrisk-weightedassetsisfundedwith12to15centsinequitycapital,projectingtheillusionthatthesefirmsarewellcapitalized. Therealityisthateachdollaroftheirtotalassetsisfundedwithfarlessequitycapital,leavingopenthematterofhowwellcapitalizedtheymightbe. Here’showtheillusioniscreated. Basel'sTier1capitalmeasureisabank'sratioofTier1capitalto risk-weightedassets. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |27 Eachcategoryofbankassetsisweighedbythesupervisoryauthorityonacomplicatedscaleofprobabilitiesandmodelsthatassignarelativeriskoflosstoeachgroup,includingoffbalancesheetitems. Assetsdeemedlowriskarereportedatloweramountsonthebalancesheet. Thelowertherisk,thelowertheamountreportedonthebalancesheetfor capitalpurposesandthehigherthecalculatedTier1ratio. WeknowfromyearsofexperienceusingtheBaselcapitalstandardsthatoncetheregulatoryauthoritiesfinishtheirweightingscheme,bank managersbegintheprocessofallocatingcapitalandassetstomaximizefinancialreturnsaroundtheseconstructedweights. Theobjectiveistomaximizeafirm'sreturnonequity(ROE)bymanagingthebalancesheetinsuchamannerthatforanylevelofequity,therisk-weightedassetsarereportedatlevelsfarlessthanactualtotalassetsundermanagement. Thiscreatestheillusionthatbankingorganizationshaveadequatecapitaltoabsorbunexpectedlosses. Forthelargestglobalfinancialcompanies,risk-weightedassetsareapproximatelyone-halfoftotalassets. This"leveragingup"hasservedworldeconomiespoorly. Incontrast,supervisorsandfinancialfirmscanchoosetorelyonthetangibleleverageratiotojudgetheoveralladequacyofcapitalfortheenterprise. Thisratiocomparesequitycapitaltototalassets,deductinggoodwill,otherintangibles,anddeferredtaxassetsfrombothequityandtotalassets. Inadditiontoincludingonlyloss-absorbingcapital,italsomakesnoattempttopredictorassignrelativeriskweightsamongassetclasses. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |28 Usingthisleverageratioasourguide,wefindforthelargestbankingorganizationsthateachdollarofassetshasonly4to6centsfundedwithtangibleequitycapital,afarsmallerbufferthanassertedundertheBasel standards. ComparingMeasures Table1reportstheBaselTier1risk-weightedcapitalratioandthe leverageratiofordifferentclassesofbankingfirms. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |29 Column4showsTier1capitalratiosrangingbetween12and15percentforthelargestglobalfirms,givingtheimpressionthatthesebanksarehighlycapitalized. However,itishardtobecertainofthatbylookingatthisratiosince risk-weightedassetsaresomuchlessthantotalassets. Incontrast,Column6showsU.S.firms'averageleverageratiotobe6percentusinggenerallyacceptedaccountingstandards(GAAP),andColumn8showstheiraverageratiotobe3.9percentusinginternationalaccountingstandards(IFRS),whichplacesmoreofthesefirms'derivativesontothebalancesheetthandoesGAAP. ThebottomportionofTable1showsthedegreeofleverageamongdifferentsizegroupsofbankingfirms,whichisstrikingaswell. TheTier1capitalmeasuresuggeststhatallsizegroupsofbanksholdcomparablecapitallevels,whiletheleverageratioreportsadifferentoutcome. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |30 Forexample,theleverageratioformostbankinggroupsnotconsideredsystemicallyimportantaveragesnear8percentorhigher. UnderGAAPaccountingstandards,thedifferenceinthisratiobetweenthelargestbankingorganizationsandthesmallerfirmsis175-250basispoints. UnderIFRSstandards,thedifferenceisasmuchas400-475basispoints. Thelargestfirms,whichmostaffecttheeconomy,holdtheleastamountofcapitalintheindustry. Whilethisshowsthemtobemorefragile,italsoidentifiesjusthowsignificantacompetitiveadvantagetheselowercapitallevelsprovidethelargestfirms. ThesecomparisonsillustratehoweasilytheBaselcapitalstandardcanconfuseandmisinformthepublicratherthanmeaningfullyreportabankingcompany’srelativefinancialstrength. Recenthistoryshowsalsojusthowdamagingthiscanbetotheindustryandtheeconomy. In2007,forexample,the10largestandmostcomplexU.S.bankingfirmsreportedTier1capitalratiosthat,onaverage,exceeded7percentof risk-weightedassets. Regulatorsdeemedtheselargesttobewellcapitalized. Thisrisk-weightedcapitalmeasure,however,mappedintoanaverageleverageratioofjust2.8percent. Welearnedalltoolatethathavinglessthan3centsoftangiblecapitalforeverydollarofassetsonthebalancesheetisnotenoughtoabsorbeventhesmallestoffinanciallosses,andcertainlynotamajorshock. Withthecrisis,theillusionofadequatecapitalwasdiscovered,afterhavingmisledshareholders,regulators,andtaxpayers. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |31 Thereareother,morerecent,examplesofhowthisarcanemeasurecan bemanipulatedtogivetheillusionofstrengthevenwhenafirmincurslosses. Forexample,inthefourthquarterof2012,DeutscheBankreportedalossof2.5billionEUR. Thatsamequarter,itsTier1risk-basedcapitalratioincreasedfrom14.2percentto15.1percentdue,inpart,to“modelandprocessenhancements”thatresultedinadeclineinrisk-weightedassets,which nowamounttojust16.6percentoftotalassets. OnFeb.1,SNSReaal,thefourthlargestDutchbankwith$5billioninassets,wasnationalizedbytheDutchgovernment. Justsevenmonthsearlier,onJune30,2012,SNSreportedaTier1risk-basedcapitalratioof12.2percent. However,thefirmreportedaTier1leverageratiobaseduponinternationalaccountingstandardsofonly1.47percent. ThisleverageratiowasmuchmoreindicativeoftheSNS’spoorfinancialposition. TheBaselIIIproposalbelatedlyintroducestheconceptofaleverageratiobutcallsforittobeonly3percent,anamountalreadyshowntobeinsufficienttoabsorbsizablefinanciallossesinacrisis. Itiswrongtosuggesttothepublicthat,withsolittlecapital,theselargestfirmscouldsurvivewithoutpublicsupportshouldtheyencounteranysignificanteconomicreversals. MisallocatingResourcesandCreatingAssetImbalances Aninherentproblemwitharisk-weightedcapitalstandardisthattheweightsreflectpastevents,arestatic,andmostlyignorethemarket'scollectivedailyjudgmentabouttherelativeriskofassets. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |32 Italsointroducestheelementofpoliticalandspecialinterestsintotheprocess,whichaffectstheassignmentofriskweightstothedifferentassetclasses. Theresultisoftentoartificiallyfavoronegroupofassetsoveranother,therebyredirectinginvestmentsandencouragingover-investmentinthefavoredassets. Theeffectofthismanagedprocessistoincreaseleverage,raisethe overallriskprofileoftheseinstitutions,andincreasethevulnerabilityofindividualcompanies,theindustry,andtheeconomy. Itisnocoincidence,forexample,thatafteraBaselstandardassignedonlya7percentriskweightontripleA,collateralizeddebtobligationsandsimilarlowriskweightsonassetswithinafirm'stradingbook,resourcesshiftedtotheseactivities. Overtime,financialgroupsdramaticallyleveragedtheseassetsontotheirbalancesheetsevenastheriskstothatassetclassincreasedexponentially. Similarly,assigningzeroweightstosovereigndebtencouragedbankingfirmstoinvestmoreheavilyintheseassets,simultaneouslydiscountingtherealrisktheypresentedandplayinganimportantroleinincreasingit. Inplacingalowerriskweightonselectassets,lesscapitalwasallocatedtofundthemandtoabsorbunexpectedlossforthesebanks,underminingtheirsolvency. AMoreRealisticCapitalStandardIsRequired Taxpayersaretheultimatebackstoptothesafetynetandhaverealmoneyatstake. Inchoosingwhichcapitalmeasureismostuseful,itisfairtoaskthefollowingquestions: InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |33 • DoestheBaselTier1ratioorthetangibleleverageratiobestindicatethecapitalstrengthofthefirm? • Whichoneismostclearlyunderstood? • Whichonebestenablescomparisonofcapitalacrossinstitutions? • Whichoneoffersthemostconfidencethatitcannotbeeasilygamed?Charts1through4comparetherelationshipofthetangibleleverageand • BaselTier1capitalratiostovariousmarketmeasuresforthelargestfirms. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |34 InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |35 InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |36 InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |37 Thesemeasuresinclude:theprice-to-bookratio,estimateddefault frequency,creditdefaultswapspreads,andmarketvalueofequity. Ineachinstance,thecorrelationofthetangibleleverageratiotothesevariablesishigherthanfortherisk-weightedcapitalratio. Whilesuchfindingsarenotconclusive,theysuggeststronglythat investors,whendecidingwheretoplacetheirmoney,relyupontheinformationprovidedbytheleverageratio. Wewoulddowelltodothesame. Despitealloftheadvancementsmadeovertheyearsinriskmeasurementandmodeling,itisimpossibletopredictthefutureortoreliablyanticipatehowandtowhatdegreeriskswillchange. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |38 Capitalstandardsshouldservetocushionagainsttheunexpected,nottodivineeventualities. AlloftheBaselcapitalaccords,includingtheproposedBaselIII,lookbackwardandthenattempttoassignriskweightsintothefuture. Itdoesn'twork. Incontrast,thetangibleleverageratioprovidesasimpler,moredirect insightintotheamountofloss-absorbingcapitalthatisavailabletoafirm. AleverageratioasI’vedefineditexplicitlyexcludesintangibleitemsthatcannotabsorblossesinacrisis. Also,usingIFRSaccountingrules,off-balancesheetderivativesarebroughtontothebalancesheet,providingfurtherinsightintoafirm'sleverage. Thus,thetangibleleverageratioissimplertocomputeandmoreeasilyunderstoodbybankmanagers,directors,andthepublic. Importantlyalso,itismorelikelytobeconsistentlyenforcedbybanksupervisors. Amoredifficultchallengemaybetodetermineanappropriateminimumleverageratio. Chart5providesahistoryofbankleverageoverthepast150yearsforthe U.S.bankingsystemandgivesinitialinsightintothisquestion. ItshowsthattheequitycapitaltoassetsratiofortheindustrypriortothefoundingoftheFederalReserveSystemin1913andtheFederalDepositInsuranceCorporationin1933rangedbetween13and16percent,regardlessofbanksize. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |39 Withoutanyinternationallydictatedstandardoranyarcaneweightingprocess,marketsrequiredwhattodayseemslikerelativelyhighcapitallevels. Inaddition,thereisanincreasingbodyofresearch(AdmatiandHellwig;Haldane;Miles,Yang,andMarcheggiano)thatsuggeststhatleverageratiosshouldbemuchhigherthantheycurrentlyareandthatBaselIII’sproposed3percentfigureaddslittlesecuritytothesystem. Finally,andimportantly,someformofrisk-weightedcapitalmeasure couldbeusefulasabackstop,orcheck,againstwhichtojudgetheadequacyoftheleverageratioforindividualbanks. Ifabankmeetstheminimumleverageratiobuthasconcentratedassetsinareasthatriskmodelssuggestincreasetheoverallvulnerabilityofthebalancesheet,thebankcouldberequiredtoincreaseitstangiblecapitallevels. Suchasystemprovidesthemostcomprehensivemeasureofcapital adequacybothinabroadcontextofallassetsandaccordingtoabank's allocationofassetsalongadefinedriskprofile. TangibleLeverageRatioandtheMythofUnintendedConsequences Concernsareoftenraisedwithinthefinancialindustryandelsewherethatrequiringthelargestandmostcomplexfirmstoholdhigherlevelsof capitalasdefinedusingatangibleleverageratiowouldhaveseriousadverseeffectsontheindustryandbroadereconomy. Ithasbeensuggested,forexample,thatrequiringmorecapitalfortheselargestbankswouldraisetheirrelativecostofcapitalandmakethemlesscompetitive. Similarly,thereisconcernthatfailingtoassignriskweightstothedifferentcategoriesofassetswouldencouragefirmstoallocatefundstothehighestriskassetstoachievetargetedreturnstoequity. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |40 TheseissueshavebeenwelladdressedbyAnatAdmatiandMartinHellwigintheirrecentlypublishedbook,TheBankers’NewClothes. TherequiredROEandtheabilitytoattractcapitalaredeterminedbyahostoffactorsbeyondthelevelofequitycapital. Theseincludeafirm’sbusinessmodel,itsrisk-adjustedreturns,thebenefitsofservicesandinvestments,andtheundistorted,or non-subsidized,costsofcapital. Alevelofcapitalthatlowersriskmayverywellattractinvestorsdrawntothemorereliablereturns. Table1showsmanyofthebankswithstrongerleverageratiosalsohavestockpricestradingatahigherpremiumtobookvaluethanthelargestfirmsthatarelesswell-capitalized. Therealsoisaconcernthatrequiringastronger,simplerleverageratiowouldcausemanagerstoplacemoreriskontheirbalancesheet. Whilepossible,theargumentisunconvincing. Withmorecapitalatriskandwithoutregulatoryweightingschemesaffectingchoice,managerswillallocatecapitalinlinewithmarketriskandreturns. Furthermore,risk-weightedmeasuresandstrongbanksupervisioncanbe availableasaback-upsystemtomonitorsuchactivity. Moreover,giventheexperienceoftherecentcrisisandtheon-going effortstomanagereportedriskassetsdown,nomattertherisk,itringshollowtosuggestthathavingahigherequitybufferforthesameamountoftotalassetsmakesthefinancialsystemlesssafe. Inaddition,thereisaconcernthatdemandingmoreequitycapitaland reducingleverageamongthelargestfirmswouldinhibitthegrowthof creditandtheeconomy. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |41 ThisstatementhasanimpliedpresumptionthattheBaselweightingschemeismoregrowthfriendlythanasimpler,strongerleverageratio. However,havingasufficientcapitalbufferallowsbankstoabsorb unexpectedlosses. Thisservestomoderatethebusinesscycleandthedeclineinlendingthatotherwiseoccursduringcontractions. IftheBaselrisk-weightschemesareincorrect,whichtheyoftenhavebeen,thistoocouldinhibitloangrowth,asitencouragesinvestmentsinothermorefavorably,butincorrectly,weightedassets. Baselsystematicallyencouragesinvestmentsinsectorspre-assignedlowerweights--forexample,mortgages,sovereigndebt,andderivatives --anddiscouragesloanstoassetsassignedhigherweights--commercial andindustrialloans. Wemayhaveinadvertentlycreatedasystemthatdiscouragestheveryloangrowthweseek,andinsteadturnedourfinancialsystemintoonethatrewardsitselfmorethanitsupportseconomicactivity. Ifriskweightscouldbeassignedthatanticipateandcalibrateriskswith perfectforesight,adjustedonadailybasis,thenperhapsrisk-weightedcapitalstandardswouldbethepreferredmethodfordetermininghowtodeploycapital. However,theycannot. Tobelievetheycanisafallacythatputstheentireeconomicsystemat risk. ChangingtheDebate Thetangibleleverageratioisasuperioralternativetorisk-weightingschemesthathaveproventobeanillusionofprecisionandinsufficientindefiningadequatecapital. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |42 Theeffectofrelyingonsuchmeasureshasbeentoweakenthefinancialsystemandmisallocateresources. Theleverageratiodeservesseriousconsiderationastheprincipaltoolinjudgingthecapitalstrengthoffinancialfirms. TheBaseldiscussionwouldbewellservedtofocusontheappropriatelevelsoftangiblecapitalforbankingfirmstoholdandtherighttransitionperiodtoachievetheselevels. Finally,weshouldnotacceptevencomfortingerrorsoflogicwhichsuggestthatBaselIIIrequirementswillcreatestrongercapitalthanthoseofBaselII,whichfailed. Instead,pastindustryperformanceandmountingacademicandotherevidencesuggestthatwewouldbebestservedtofocusonastrongleverageratiostandardinjudgingafirmandtheindustry'sfinancialstrength. Nobankcapitalprogramisperfect. Ourresponsibilityasregulatorsanddepositinsurersistochoosethebestavailablemeasurethatwillcontributetofinancialstability. Note: ThomasM.HoenigwasconfirmedbytheSenateasViceChairmanoftheFederalDepositInsuranceCorporationonNov.15,2012. HejoinedtheFDIConApril16,2012,asamemberoftheFDICBoardofDirectorsforasix-yearterm. HeisamemberoftheexecutiveboardoftheInternationalAssociationofDepositInsurers. PriortoservingontheFDICboard,Mr.HoenigwasthePresidentoftheFederalReserveBankofKansasCityandamemberoftheFederalReserveSystem'sFederalOpenMarketCommitteefrom1991to2011. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |43 Mr.HoenigwaswiththeFederalReservefor38years,beginningasaneconomistandthenasaseniorofficerinbankingsupervisionduringthe U.S.bankingcrisisofthe1980s. In1986,heledtheKansasCityFederalReserveBank'sDivisionofBankSupervisionandStructure,directingtheoversightofmorethan1,000banksandbankholdingcompanieswithassetsrangingfromlessthan $100millionto$20billion. HebecamePresidentoftheKansasCityFederalReserveBankonOctober1,1991. Mr.HoenigisanativeofFortMadison,Iowa.HereceivedadoctorateineconomicsfromIowaStateUniversity. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |44 PCAOBIssuesPolicyStatementonExtraordinaryCooperationinConnectionwithBoardInvestigationsWashington,DC ThePublicCompanyAccountingOversightBoardtodaypublishedaformalstatementconcerningthebenefitsthatmaybeavailabletoregisteredpublicaccountingfirmsandindividualswhoprovideextraordinarycooperationinPCAOBinvestigations. ThepolicystatementdescribeswhatthePCAOBmayconsidertobe extraordinarycooperationandhowcreditmightbereflectedforsuchcooperation. ThepolicyisgenerallyconsistentwiththeBoard'sexistingpractices. "Thispolicyprovidesbenefitstoinvestorsandreal,tangibleincentivestocooperatetofirmsandpersonsassociatedwithfirms,"saidJamesR.Doty,PCAOBChairman." ExtraordinarycooperationpermitstheBoardtomorequicklyandefficientlyaddresswrongdoingfortheprotectionofinvestors,andmayearnpartiescreditinconnectionwiththeBoard'sdisciplinaryprocesses." Accordingtothepolicystatement,extraordinarycooperationisvoluntaryandtimelyactionbeyondcompliancewithlegalorregulatoryobligations. Cooperationthatcouldresultincreditincludesself-reportingviolationsbeforetheconductcomestotheattentionoftheBoardoranotherregulator. Self-reportingismorevaluabletheearlieritisprovided. Theothertypesofextraordinarycooperationthatcouldresultincreditaretakingremedialorcorrectiveactiontoreducetheriskofsimilar InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |45 violationsrecurring,andprovidingsubstantialassistanceinthePCAOB'sinvestigativeprocesses. Creditforcooperationmayresultinreducedchargesorsanctionsinadisciplinaryproceeding. Insomecases,extraordinarycooperationmayleadtolanguageinsettlementdocumentsnotingthecooperationanditseffect. Inexceptionalcases,extraordinarycooperationcouldleadtonodisciplinaryactionatall. "ExtraordinarycooperationcanhelpstreamlineandexpeditePCAOB investigations,whichallowstheBoardtoturnitsattentionandresourcestootherpotentialauditormisconduct,"saidClaudiusB.Modesti,DirectorofthePCAOBDivisionofEnforcementandInvestigations. "Thispolicystatementisanimportantstepinencouragingauditorstogoaboveandbeyondwhatisrequiredbylaw,"hesaid. MembersofthepublicwhowishtoreportpotentialviolationsoflaworPCAOBrulesmaycontacttheBoardthroughtheTipandReferralCenteronthePCAOBwebsite. Summary ThePublicCompanyAccountingOversightBoard("PCAOB"or"Board")isissuingthispolicystatementtoprovideguidancetoregisteredpublicaccountingfirms("firms")andpersonsassociatedwithfirms("associatedpersons")concerninghowextraordinarycooperationmaybeconsideredindeterminingtheoutcomeofaPCAOB investigation. ThispolicystatementdoesnotbindandisnotintendedtoinfluenceanyPCAOBhearingofficerortheBoardintheadjudicationoflitigatedmatters. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |46 Further,pleasenotethattheBoardisnotadoptinganyruleormakinganycommitmentorpromiseaboutanyspecificcase,orconferringanyrightsonanypersonorentity. Further,theBoardisnotinanywaylimitingitsdiscretiontoevaluateeverycaseindividually,onitsownparticularfactsandcircumstances. Thetypesofcooperationthatcouldresultincreditare:voluntaryandtimelyself-reporting;voluntaryandtimelyremedialorcorrectiveaction;andvoluntaryandtimelysubstantialassistancetotheBoard’sinvestigativeprocessesortootherlawenforcementauthorities. Theseactions,aloneortakentogether,canbeviewedasextraordinary cooperationforpurposesofthispolicystatementand,dependingonthefactsandcircumstances,mayinfluencethePCAOB’senforcementdecisions. Bypublishingthispolicystatementoncooperation,theBoardseeks: toencouragefirmsandassociatedpersonstovoluntarilyandtimelyself-report,correctandremediateviolativebehavior,andprovidesubstantialassistancetotheBoard’sinvestigativeprocesses;and toincreasetransparencyintohowtheBoardmaycreditcooperation.Moreover,theBoardwill,inappropriatecasesandinitsdiscretion,note insettlementdocumentsorotherpublicstatementsthatithascredited theextraordinarycooperationofafirmorassociatedperson. DoingsowillenhancetheBoard’senforcementprogrambypublicizingthebenefitsofcooperationandinformingfirmsandassociatedpersonsofthetypesofcooperationthatmaymeritcredit. I.Introduction TheSarbanes-OxleyAct(the"Act")andBoardRulesrequirefirmsandassociatedpersonstocooperateinconnectionwithPCAOBinspectionsandinvestigations. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |47 Section102(b)(3)oftheActrequireseveryfirmapplyingforPCAOBregistrationtosupply aconsenttocooperateinandcomplywithanyrequestfortestimonyortheproductionofdocumentsmadebythePCAOBinthefurtheranceofitsauthorityandresponsibilitiesundertheAct, anagreementtosecureandenforcesimilarconsentsfromeachassociatedpersonofthefirm,and astatementthatthefirmunderstandsandagrees,amongotherthings,thatitscooperationandcomplianceshallbeaconditiontothecontinuingeffectivenessofthefirm’sregistrationwiththeBoard. Evenifafirmfailstoprovidethoseitemswithitsapplication,itisnotrelievedoftheobligationstocooperateinandcomplywithBoardrequestsmadeinfurtheranceoftheBoard’sauthorityandresponsibilitiesundertheAct. Moreover,twoBoardRulesaddresscooperationbyregisteredfirmsandassociatedpersons. BoardRule4006,DutytoCooperatewithInspectors,appliestoinspections,andrequiresaregisteredfirmandanyassociatedpersonofthatfirmtocooperatewithanyBoardinspectionbyprovidinginformationrequestedinBoardinspectionsandprovidingaccesstothefirm’srecords. Rule4006alsorequiresthatinformationprovidedtotheBoardbetruthfulandnotmisleading. Sections105(c)(4)and(5)oftheActandBoardRule5300(a)governsanctionsfornoncooperationwithaninspection. Section105(b)(3)oftheActandBoardRule5110,NoncooperationwithanInvestigation,applytoinvestigations,andprovidethattheBoardmay sanctionafirmorassociatedpersonforfailingtocooperatewithaBoardinvestigation. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |48 TheformsofcooperationcoveredbyRule5110areenumeratedinparagraphs(1)-(3),withparagraph(4)providingacatch-allprovisionforfailuretocooperategenerally.Section105(b)(3)oftheActandBoardRule 5300(b)governsanctionsforfailuretocooperatewithaninvestigation. Incertainsituations,afirmorassociatedpersonmightcooperatewithPCAOBinvestigationsbeyondcompliancewiththoseobligations. CooperationbeyondwhatisrequiredtocomplywithlegalandregulatoryobligationscancontributesignificantlytothesuccessoftheBoard’smissionofprotectinginvestorsandfurtheringthepublicinterestinthepreparationofinformative,accurateandindependentauditreports. SuchextraordinarycooperationmighthelptheBoard’sstafftodiscoverpotentialviolationsearlierandallowtheBoardtoconcludeinvestigationsinamoreefficientandtimelymanner,thusreducingtheriskthatsuchviolativeconductwillberepeatedandresultinmoresignificantharmtoinvestors,andassistingtheBoardinidentifyingauditreportsthatmaybeinaccurate. Forthatreason,extraordinarycooperationinconnectionwithBoardinvestigationsmaybeconsideredbytheBoard’sDivisionofEnforcementandInvestigations(the"Division")initsdisciplinaryrecommendationstotheBoard,andbytheBoardindeterminingwhethertoacceptsettlementoffers. II.Whatisextraordinarycooperation? Extraordinarycooperationisvoluntaryandtimelyaction–beyondcompliancewithlegalorregulatoryobligations–thatcontributestothemissionoftheBoard. Therearethreebroadtypesofcooperationthat(aloneortakentogether)mightmeritcooperationcredit:self-reporting;remedialorcorrectiveaction;andsubstantialassistancetotheBoard’sinvestigativeprocessesortootherlawenforcementauthorities. Self-Reportingrelatestoconductuponlearningofviolations. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |49 Afirmorassociatedpersonmayearncreditforself-reportingbymakingvoluntary,timelyandfulldisclosureofthefactsrelatingtoviolationsbeforetheconductcomestotheattentionoftheBoardoranotherregulator. Ifself-reportingisrequiredbylegalorregulatoryobligations,itisnotvoluntaryandisnoteligibleforcooperationcredit. Thus,forexample,self-reportingisnotvoluntaryifmadeafterreceiptofaregulatoryinquiry(e.g.,anyrequest,demandorsubpoenaforthesameinformationordocumentsfromtheBoard,theU.S.SecuritiesandExchangeCommission,Congress,anyotherfederal,state,localorforeignauthority,oranyself-regulatoryorganization). Likewise,self-reportingisnotvoluntaryifrequiredbySection10A(b)oftheSecuritiesExchangeActof1934[15U.S.C.§78j-1(b)],Auditrequirements-Requiredresponsetoauditdiscoveries(whichaddressesanauditor’sobligationtoreporttheillegalactsoftheauditclient)andRule10A-1thereunder. Asaresult,iftheauditordiscoversordetectsanillegalactduringeitheraquarterlyrevieworannualaudit,andisrequiredtoreportitpursuanttoSection10A,theauditorwouldnotbeeligibletoearncreditfor self-reporting. Self-reportingismorevaluabletheearlieritisprovided. Whenfirmsorassociatedpersonsself-reporttothePCAOB,theBoardencouragesthemtoself-reportbydirectlycontactingtheDivisionofEnforcementandInvestigations,orbyprovidinginformationanddocumentsviatheBoard’stipshotline:http://pcaobus.org/Enforcement/Tips/Pages/default.aspx RemedialorCorrectiveActionsarevoluntary,timelyandmeaningfulactionsdesignedtoreducethelikelihoodandriskthatsimilarviolationswillrecur,aswellasactionstocorrectviolativeconduct. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com
P age |50 Forexample,afirmmightearncreditbypromptlyandvoluntarilymodifyingandimprovingitsqualitycontrolsorotherinternalpoliciesandprocedurestopreventrecurrenceoftheviolativeconduct. Afirmmighttakeremedialorcorrectiveactionbyre-assigningorlimitingtheactivitiesofthoseindividualsresponsibleforviolations(whichmightincludemembersoftheauditteam,aswellaspersonsoutsidetheauditteam,includingpersonsinfirmmanagement),andinappropriatecasesbyterminatingorimposingdisciplineupontheresponsibleindividuals. Afirm’sremedialorcorrectiveactionmightalsoincludepromptlynotifyingitsauditclientoritsauditcommittee(asappropriate)oftheviolativeconductandcooperatingwiththeclient,sothattheclientcan(ifnecessary)takestepstocomplywiththefederalsecuritieslawsandregulations(e.g.,byengaginganauditortore-auditthefinancialstatementsaffectedbyanauditor’sindependenceviolations). Afirm’sremedialorcorrectiveactionalsomightincludeappropriatelycompensatingthoseadverselyaffectedbythefirm’sviolations. SubstantialAssistancetotheBoard’sinvestigativeprocessesortootherlawenforcementauthoritiesincludestimelyandvoluntarilyprovidinginformationordocumentsthatmightnothavebeendiscoveredabsent thatcooperation,orbeyondthatsoughtbytheBoard’sstaffviaaccountingboarddemandsandrequests,andbeyondwhatisrequiredpursuanttolegalandregulatoryreportingrequirements. Forexample,afirmmightsubstantiallyassisttheBoardbyconductingatimely,thorough,objectiveandcompetentinternalinvestigationintotheviolativeconductwhenitwasdiscovered,andinformingtheDivision’sstaffofthepertinentfactsdiscoveredintheinternalinvestigation. Afirmorassociatedpersonmightsubstantiallyassistanotherlawenforcementauthority’sinvestigativeprocessesbyself-reportingtothatauthority,orprovidingitwiththefactsdiscoveredinaninternalinvestigation. InternationalAssociationofRiskandComplianceProfessionals(IARCP) www.risk-compliance-association.com