1 / 14

Performance Based Remediation Contracting for BRAC Installations

Performance Based Remediation Contracting for BRAC Installations. AFCEE WERC09 Industry Day. AFRPA/BPM 28 July 2011. Agenda. Air Force Real Property Agency (AFRPA) Overview BRAC Program Overview Accelerated Site Completion (ASC) PBC Drivers and Expectations. AFRPA Overview. SECAF.

aira
Download Presentation

Performance Based Remediation Contracting for BRAC Installations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Performance Based Remediation Contracting for BRAC Installations AFCEE WERC09 Industry Day AFRPA/BPM 28 July 2011

  2. Agenda • Air Force Real Property Agency (AFRPA) Overview • BRAC Program Overview • Accelerated Site Completion (ASC) • PBC Drivers and Expectations

  3. AFRPA Overview SECAF Secretary of the Air Force SAF/IE Assistant Secretary for Installations, Environment, and Logistics A7C SAF/IEE SAF/IEI The Air Force Civil Engineer Deputy Assistant Secretary Energy, Environment, Safety, andOccupational Health Deputy Assistant Secretary Installations AFRPA AFCEE Air Force Real Property Agency Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment

  4. BRAC Program Program Portfolio GALENA FOL KULIS ANGB FOUR LAKES COMM LORING K.I. SAWYER PLATTSBURGH PEASE WURTSMITH GEN. MITCHELL GRIFFISS MCCLELLAN ROSLYN O’HARE MATHER NEWARK ONIZUKA (’95) LOWRY RICKENBACKER CHANUTE CASTLE GENTILE ONIZUKA (’05) GRISSOM GEORGE BUCKLEY ANNEX RICHARDS-GEBAUR ONTARIO NORTON EAKER MARCH WILLIAMS REESE MYRTLE BEACH AFRL MESA CARSWELL ENGLAND BERGSTROM KELLY LEGACY BRAC and BRAC05, WBT (24) BROOKS CITY-BASE HOMESTEAD LEGACY BRAC, pending transfer (9) BRAC ‘05, pending transfer (7)

  5. BRAC Program Accomplishments 40 bases, 88,000 acres 24 whole base transfers $80M total revenue 77,500 acres transferred 48,000 jobs created 13 public airports 80% IRP sites in RIP 57% IRP/MMRP sites closed • Air Force BRAC program • Community-focused • Remediate, Return and Reuse • 2014: 100% property transfer

  6. Accelerated Site Completion (ASC)BRAC Program Goals • New Air Force restoration goals issued Feb 2011 • 75% site completion by end of 2012; 90% by end of FY15 • 75% open sites in PBC by end of FY11; 95% by end of FY14 • “Completion” defined as following • Regulatory closure without use restrictions • Transfer of environmental liability (e.g., Privatization) • Minimized associated costs to greatest degree feasible

  7. Accelerated Site Completion (ASC)BRAC Program Goals (cont.) • Previous cleanup strategies closely aligned with reuse • RODs employed land use controls/institutional controls (LUC/ICs) consistent with LRA future use • LUC/ICs were recommended as a best value based on intended land use • New Air Force goals aimed at accelerating cleanup • AFRPA strategy may modify existing or establish new contracts to achieve site completions

  8. Prior Year, FY11 & FY12 PBCs Loring K.I. Sawyer Pease Plattsburgh Griffiss McClellan Wurtsmith Grissom Newark O'Hare Mather Rickenbacker Gentile Lowry Castle George Norton Chanute Richards-Gebaur Williams Eaker March Myrtle Beach Reese Carswell Bergstrom England Kelly ONE PBR Homestead FY11 PBRs FY12 PBRs PRIOR YR PBRs

  9. PBC Drivers and ExpectationsRequirements • Current and future PBCs include more defined objectives for site closure • Cost effective site closure is top priority • LTM vs. Pre-Decision sites • Sites in LTM will be revisited to address closure potential • Pre-Decision sites allow more opportunities for closure • PBC contracts will consider all possibilities for site closure • All sites are “on the table” to be addressed (including landfills) • Closure costs will be evaluated against the CTC and program-specific thresholds • Sites where closure is not proposed must be supported by a cost-benefit evaluation • Innovation encouraged

  10. PBC Drivers and ExpectationsCosts and Payment • Cost evaluated against Government cost-to-complete (CTC) • Contracts with predominantly LUC/IC or LTM sites may indicate ceiling above the CTC • Contract payments made as milestones are met • Milestones should be well-planned and thought-out over the entire contract POP

  11. BRAC Program Investment Timeline • FY 11-13 investment in ASC • Program Investment Returns Dividends • Reduced Long Term Costs

  12. BRAC Program Investment Planned Timeline • FY11-13 investment to accelerate site completion • Review all sites for completion • Compliance site evaluation • Revised PBRs • New PBRs • PBRs run course • Post-Disposal Management • Program investment returns dividends Annual Estimated Expenditures • Reduced long term costs Current Program Projections Program Projections, w/ Investment Time

  13. PBC Indicators

  14. Summary • PBCs are a proven Air Force restoration investment method • AFRPA has developed the PBC concepts and supports future evolution of PBCs to adapt to new program requirements • New Air Force goals and resulting requirements are an opportunity to take a fresh look at cleanup activities and technologies • New ideas are desired • Mid-contract ideas will be evaluated

More Related