1 / 14

Tom Danielson University of Wisconsin Tim Gosau Hamburg University

A Search for BFKL in DIS Multijets. Tom Danielson University of Wisconsin Tim Gosau Hamburg University. QCD Evolution. Control x and Q 2 dependence of parton distributions according to QCD Splitting functions give probability quark or gluon will split into parton pair

aileen
Download Presentation

Tom Danielson University of Wisconsin Tim Gosau Hamburg University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Search for BFKL in DIS Multijets Tom Danielson University of Wisconsin Tim Gosau Hamburg University

  2. QCD Evolution • Control x and Q2 dependence of parton distributions according to QCD • Splitting functions give probability quark or gluon will split into parton pair • Test applicability of DGLAP evolution vs. BFKL • DGLAP should not be applicable at low xBj • Summed in terms of ln(Q2) • Terms involving ln(1/xBj) ignored • BFKL should be applicable at low xBj • Sums evolutions in terms of ln(1/xBj)

  3. DGLAP: ordering in both kT and x BFKL: not ordered in kT but ordered in x Potential differences DGLAP: Jets strongly correlated in Energy, azimuthal and polar angles BFKL: Jets not necessarily strongly correlated Expect more energetic jets in forward region with BFKL than with DGLAP Parton Energy and kT Ordering

  4. H1 Inclusive Dijet Events • f correlation of two most energetic jets in multijet events • 1996-1997 H1 data: ET > 7 GeV • Compare to DGLAP for NLO O(as2) (dijet) and NLO O(as3) (trijet) • O(as2): Data not described • O(as3): Agreement at high xBjStill excess at low Q2 and xBj • Excess events with small fseparation of highest ET jets NLO: O(as3) DESY–03–160 October 2003 NLO: O(as2)

  5. ZEUS Multijet Measurements • ZEUS inclusive dijet and trijet measurements well understood and modeled • Multijet cross sections vs. NLO calculations (L. Li and N. Krumnack) • DGLAP NLO dijet and trijet calculations describe data well in general • Examine if agreement extends to “BFKL” kinematic regions Dijet Trijet

  6. NLO vs. ZEUS Inclusive Jets • Inclusive jet cross section vs. DISENT (S. Lammers and J. Terron) • Low xBjdisagreement between data and DISENT • Disagreement evident when jet required • Structure Function analyses do not require jets • Further explore this region requiring more than one jet

  7. Strategy for Studying BFKL • Examine jet azimuthal and energy correlations using low xBj and low Q2 • xBj < 10-2 • Q2 < 150 GeV2 • Jets not strongly correlated in energy and azimuthal angle indicate BFKL effects • DGLAP: Jets strongly correlated in ET, angles • “Back to back” in f • Correlation in h reflects ktcompensation • BFKL: Jets not strongly correlated • More energetic jets expected in forward region

  8. Data and offline cuts • Data: 1998-2000 electron and positron: 82.2 pb-1 • DIS Kinematic Cuts • 10 < Q2 < 5000 GeV2 yjb > 0.04 yel < 0.6 • cos(gh) < 0.7 hmax > 2.5 40 < E – pz < 60 GeV • (E – pz)elec < 54 GeV |z vertex| < 50 cm • Standard Dijet Cuts • ET,Breit > 5 GeV • -1 < hLab < 2.5 • mjj > 25 GeV • Trigger Selection • DIS03 or HPP14 • DIS03: Ee > 4GeV, re > 36cm • HPP14: 2 jets in lab frame minimum, ET > 2 (2.5) GeV • Cuts to isolate BFKL kinematics (not yet implemented) • Q2 < 150 GeV2 • 10-4 < x < 10-2 • DIS01 • DIS01: Ee > 4GeV, 24 x 12 cm2 box cut • Prescaled

  9. Dijet Event Dijet selected by these cuts. Looking for forward jets

  10. LO Monte Carlo • ARIADNE v4.08 • Color Dipole Model (CDM) • Gluons emitted from color field between quark-antiquark pairs • Supplemented with BGF processes • Gluons not necessarily kt ordered (BFKL-like) • LEPTO v6.5.1 • Matrix Element Parton Shower (MEPS) • Parton cascade • Decreasing virtuality as cascade progresses • Radiated gluons kt-ordered (DGLAP-based)

  11. Dijet Data vs. LEPTO • ET in Breit Frame of 2 highest ET jets • Ordered in ET • Ordered in h • Reasonable agreement overall Et2Bre Et1Bre h2Lab h1Lab

  12. Dijet Data vs. ARIADNE • ET in Breit Frame of 2 highest ET jets • Ordered in ET • Ordered in h • Need to investigate discrepancies with ARIADNE Et2Bre Et1Bre h2Lab h1Lab

  13. Comparison of Analyses • Initial comparison of T.D. and T. Gosau • ET in Breit Frame of 2 highest ET jets • Ordered in ET • Working on this Et1Bre Et2Bre

  14. Summary • Comparison beginning between 2 analyses • Reasonable agreement between ZEUS 98-00 data and LEPTO • Disagreement between ZEUS 98-00 data and ARIADNE needs investigation • Plans • Repeat H1 measurement • Higher ZEUS 98-00 luminosity an advantage • H1 luminosity 21 pb-1 from 96/97 • ZEUS 98-00: 82.2 pb-1 • Find kinematics and variables that enhance discrepancies between BFKL and DGLAP.

More Related