1 / 26

THERMAL EVOLUTION OF N EUTRON ST A R S: Theory and observations

THERMAL EVOLUTION OF N EUTRON ST A R S: Theory and observations. D.G. Yakovlev. Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, St.-Petersburg, Russia. 1. Formulation of the Cooling Problem 2. Superlfuidity and Heat Capacity 3. Neutrino Emission

aideen
Download Presentation

THERMAL EVOLUTION OF N EUTRON ST A R S: Theory and observations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. THERMAL EVOLUTION OF NEUTRON STARS: Theory and observations D.G.Yakovlev Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, St.-Petersburg, Russia 1. Formulation of the Cooling Problem 2. Superlfuidity and Heat Capacity 3. Neutrino Emission 4. Cooling Theory versus Observations Catania, October 2012,

  2. THREECOOLING STAGES After 1 minute of proto-neutron star stage

  3. Analytical estimates Thermal balance of cooling star with isothermal interior Slow cooling via Modified Urca process Fast cooling via Direct Urca process

  4. OBSERVATIONS: MAIN PRINCIPLES B- axis Spin axis Isolated (cooling) neutron stars – no additional heat sources: Age t Surface temperature Ts MEASURING DISTANCES: parallax; electron column density from radio data; association with clusters and supernova remnants; fitting observed spectra MEASURING AGES: pulsar spin-down age (from P and dP/dt); association with stellar clusters and supernova remnants MEASURING SURFACE TEMPERATURES: fitting observed spectra

  5. OBSERVATIONS Chandra image of the Vela pulsar wind nebula NASA/PSU Pavlov et al Chandra XMM-Newton

  6. MULTIWAVELENGTH SPECTRUM OF THE VELA PULSAR

  7. THERMAL RADIATION FROM ISOLATED NEUTRON STARS

  8. OBSERVATIONS AND BASIC COOLING CURVE Nonsuperfluid star Nucleon core Modified Urca neutrino emission: slow cooling Minimal cooling; SF off – does not explain all data

  9. MAXIMAL COOLING; SF OFF MODIFIED AND DIRECT URCA PROCESSES 1=Crab 2=PSR J0205+6449 3=PSR J1119-6127 4=RX J0822-43 5=1E 1207-52 6=PSR J1357-6429 7=RX J0007.0+7303 8=Vela 9=PSR B1706-44 10=PSR J0538+2817 11=PSR B2234+61 12=PSR 0656+14 13=Geminga 14=RX J1856.4-3754 15=PSR 1055-52 16=PSR J2043+2740 17=PSR J0720.4-3125 Does not explain the data

  10. MAXIMAL COOLING: SRTONG PROTON SF Two models for proton superfluidity Neutrino emissivity profiles • Superfluidity: • Suppresses modified Urca process in the outer core • Suppresses direct Urca just after its threshold (“broadens • the threshold”)

  11. MAXIMAL COOLING: SRTONG PROTON SF

  12. MAXIMAL COOLING: STRONG PROTON SF – II Mass ordering is the same!

  13. MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM COOLING SF on Gusakov et al. (2004, 2005) Minimum cooling Gusakov et al. (2004) Minimum-maximum cooling Gusakov et al. (2005)

  14. Cassiopeia A supernova remnant Very bright radio source Weak in optics due to interstellar absoprtion Distance: kpc (Reed et al. 1995) Diameter: 3.1 pc No historical data on progenitor Asymmetric envelope expansion Age yrs => 1680 from observations of expanding envelope (Fesen et al. 2006) Cassiopeia A observed by the Hubble Space Telescope

  15. MYSTERIOUS COMPACT CENTRAL OBJECT IN Cas A SNR • Various theoretical predictions: • e.g., a black hole (Shklovsky 1979) • Discovery: Tananbaum (1999) • first-light Chandra X-ray observations • Later found in ROSAT and Einstein • archives • Later studies (2000-2009): • Pavlov et al. (2000) • Chakrabarty et al. (2001) • Pavlov and Luna (2009) • Main features: • No evidence of pulsations • Spectral fits using black-body model • or He, H, Fe atmosphere models • give too small radius R<5 km • Conclusion: MYSTERY – • Not a thermal X-ray radiation emitted • from the entire surface of neutron star A Chandra X-ray Observatory image of the supernova remnant Cassiopeia A. Credit: Chandra image: NASA/CXC/Southampton/W.Ho; illustration: NASA/CXC/M.Weiss

  16. COOLING NEUTRON STAR IN Cas A SNR OBSERVATIONS available for Ho and Heinke (2009) Heinke and Ho (2010): 16 sets of Chandra observations in 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2007, 2009 totaling 1 megasecond (two weeks) Ho and Heinke (2009) Nature 462, 671 Fitting the observed spectrum with carbon atmosphere model gives the emission from the entire neutron star surface Conclusion: Cas A SNR contains cooling neutron star with carbon surface It is the youngest cooling NS whose thermal radiation is observed Neutron star parameters • Main features: • Rather warm neutron star • Consistent with standard • cooling • Not interesting for cooling • theory!!! (Yakovlev et al. 2011)

  17. REVOLUTION: Cooling Dynamics of Cas A NS! Heinke & Ho, ApJL (2010): Surface temperature decline by 4% over 10 years “Standard cooling” cannot explain these observations Observed cooling curve slope Standard cooling curve slope Ho & Heinke 2010 New observation Standard cooling M, R, d, NH are fixed • Cas A neutron star: • Is warm as for standard cooling • Cools much faster than for • standard cooling

  18. Effects of Superfluidity on Cooling Neutron superfluidity: Faster cooling because of CP neutrino emission Proton superfluidity: Slower cooling because of suppression of neutrino emission Together: Sharp acceleration of cooling Superfluidity naturally explains observations! Both, neutron and proton, superfluids are needed

  19. Example: Cooling of 1.65 Msun Star APR EOS Neutrino emission peak: ~80 yrs ago

  20. Neutron stars of different masses

  21. Cas A neutron star among other isolated neutron stars One model of superfluidity for all neutron stars Only Tcn superfluidity I explains all the sources Gusakov et al. (2004) Alternatively: wider profile, but the efficiency of CPneutrino emission at low densities is weak

  22. Slope of cooling curve = slope of cooling curve = standard cooling (Murca) = enhanced cooling (Durca) >> 0.1 => something extraordinary! Theoretical model forCas ANS Shternin et al. (2011) Now:s = 1.35 =very big number =>unique phenomenon! Happens very rarely! Measurements of s in the next decade confirm or reject this interpretation

  23. Cooling objects – connections • Isolated (cooling) neutron stars • Accreting neutron stars in X-ray transients (heated inside) • Sources of superbursts • Magnetars (heated inside) INSs XRTs Magnetars Deep crustal heating: Theory: Haensel & Zdunik (1990) Applications to XRTs: Brown, Bildsten & Rutledge (1998) Cooling of initially hot star Magnetic heating

  24. CONCLUSIONS (without Cas A) • OBSERVATIONS • Include sources of different types • Seem more important than theory • Are still insufficient to solve NS problem • THEORY • Too many successful explanations • Main cooling regulator: neutrino luminosity • Warmest observed stars are low-massive; their neutrino luminosity • <= 0.01 of modified Urca • Coldest observed stars are more massive; their neutrino luminosity • >= 100 of modified Urca

  25. CONCLUSIONS about Cas A • Observations of cooling Cas A NS in real time – matter of good luck! • Natural explanation: onset of neutron superfluidity in NS coreabout 80 years ago; maximum Tcn in the core>~7 x 108 K • Profile of critical temperature of neutrons over NS core should be wide • Neutrino emission prior to onset of neutron superfluidityshould be 20-100 times smaller than standardlevel  strong proton superfluidity in NS core? • To explain all observations of cooling NSsby one model of superfluidity,Tcn profile has to be shiftedto higher densities • Prediction: fast cooling will last for a few decades • Cooling of Cas A NS  direct evidence for superfluidity?

  26. Two Cas A teams Minimal cooling theory: Page, Lattimer, Prakash, Steiner (2004) Gusakov, Kaminker, Yakovlev, Gnedin (2004) Superfluid Cas A neutron star: D. Page, M. Prakash, J.M. Lattimer, A.W. Steiner, PRL, vol. 106, Issue 8, id. 081101 (2011) P.S. Shternin, D.G. Yakovlev, C.O. Heinke, W.C.G. Ho, D.J. Patnaude, MNRAS Lett., 412, L108 (2011) Doubts Carbon atmosphere: why? Theory:probability to observe is small (too good to be true) Theory:to explain observations of all cooling neutron stars one needs unusual Tcn – profile over neutron star core Observations:data processing???

More Related