1 / 5

Reading Sympathetically and Critically

Reading Sympathetically and Critically. To effectively read arguments, you should adopt a multistep approach. Read as a believer. Read as a doubter. Consider alternative views, and analyze sources of disagreement. Use disagreement productively to prompt further investigation.

ahawk
Download Presentation

Reading Sympathetically and Critically

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reading Sympathetically and Critically • To effectively read arguments, you should adopt a multistep approach. • Read as a believer. • Read as a doubter. • Consider alternative views, and analyze sources of disagreement. • Use disagreement productively to prompt further investigation. “The idea that we should be open to all ideas is very different from the supposition that all ideas are equally valid” --Lawrence Summers, President, Harvard University

  2. Reading as a Believer • Practice “empathic listening” (see the world through the author’s eyes). • This requires putting aside your own viewpoint for the moment. • For this AND the other steps in reading arguments effectively, you must: • -read the argument carefully for general meaning. • -analyze each paragraph for says and does. A does statement identifies a paragraph’s function. A says statement summarizes the paragraph’s content.

  3. Reading as a Doubter • Whether you tend to agree with the argument or not, you should now read it critically or skeptically. • Demand more proof, doubt evidence given, challenge the author’s assumptions and values. • -What is the background of the author or his or her sources? What bias is being brought forward? • -What are the source of the claims made? • -Are alternatives ignored?

  4. Considering Alternative Views and Analyzing Sources of Disagreement • Since an argument involves two or more conflicting assertions, you must be sure to consider the important disagreements. • Disagreements may be: • -about facts or reality. “Facts” are often not the empirical facts of science, but are often contested. • -about values, beliefs, or assumptions. For example, sometimes these disagreements may manifest themselves as disagreements about definitions (e.g., what is pornography or what is a minority).

  5. Using Disagreement Productively to Prompt Further Investigation • This is both a strategy for reading arguments and a bridge towards constructing your own arguments. • -Seek out sources of facts and more complete versions of alternative (and the current) views. • -Determine what values are at stake in the issue and articulate your own values. • -Consider ways to synthesize alternative views. "I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ: Think it possible you may be mistaken.” --Oliver Cromwell to members of parliament

More Related