1 / 14

Energy Security Federal Research Center at White Oak, Silver Spring, MD January 16, 2013

Energy Security Federal Research Center at White Oak, Silver Spring, MD January 16, 2013. White Oak Aerial View. Dynamic . Dynamic . Dynamic . Program!. Program!. Program!. Square. Square. Footage. Footage. Location. Location. Intensity. Intensity. Reliability. Timing. Timing.

agrata
Download Presentation

Energy Security Federal Research Center at White Oak, Silver Spring, MD January 16, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Energy Security Federal Research Center at White Oak, Silver Spring, MD January 16, 2013

  2. White Oak Aerial View

  3. Dynamic Dynamic Dynamic Program! Program! Program! Square Square Footage Footage Location Location Intensity Intensity Reliability Timing Timing Dealing with Growth 1997 Master Plan: 6K Employees, 2.1M GSF 2009 Master Plan: 9K Employees, 3.9M GSF

  4. White Oak ESPC I Features 25KW photo voltaic array Renovation of Firehouse/Maintenance Garage Construction of Generator Hall with Control Room 5.8MW Dual Fuel Engine Generator 2MW standby diesel generator (Black start generator) 1 - 1,130 Ton Absorption Chiller 2 - 1,130 Ton Electric Centrifugal Chillers 3 - 10 MMBtu/Hr Hot Water Boilers Ancillary Plant Equipment and Distribution System

  5. White Oak ESPC II Features • ESPC II Base Delivery Order • Photovoltaic Array Expansion • Building Expansion for Generators • 1 - 4.5 MW Natural Gas Combustion Turbine • 1 - 1980-ton Electric Centrifugal Chiller • Ancillary Plant Equipment and Distribution System • ESPC II “All Options” Modification • 2 - 4.5 MW Natural Gas Combustion Turbines • 2 - 1980-ton Electric Centrifugal Chillers • 1 - 1130-ton Absorption Chiller • Ancillary Plant Equipment and Distribution System • ESPC II “Elec Gen” Modification • 1 - 4.5 MW Natural Gas Combustion Turbine

  6. Energy Security (through ESPC II) • Interconnection with Electric Grid • Two separate feeders into substation • Underground Electrical Distribution System • Automatic Load-Shed Scheme • 5.8 MW Engine-Generator • Dual Fuel/Primary Power Source during early stages of campus development • 4 - 4.5 MW Turbine-Generators • 2 MW Standby Diesel Generator

  7. ESPC III – Development Considerations • Expanded Auto Load Shed Scheme • Additional Dual-fuel Generation Assets • Steam from CUP vs. Local Steam Generators • Labs and vivariums • Challenging Site

  8. ESPC III Base – Major Physical Features • Electrical Generation • Two - 7.5 MW turbine-generators (dual fuel) • One - 4.5 MW turbine-generator (natural gas only) • One - 5 MW steam turbine-generator • Two - 2.25 MW diesel black-start generators • Back-up Fuel Storage (80,000 gal) • Chilled Water (3 @ 2,500 tons + 1 relocated) • Cooling Towers for Chillers and Steam Condensers • Thermal Energy Storage (2 million gal) • Heat Recovery Steam Generators (132,000 lbh) • Dual-fuel Steam Back-up Boiler (one 25 KPPH) • Heating Hot Water Converters (112 MMBTUH)

  9. CUP: Bird’s Eye Perspective

  10. Micro Grid – Systems Integration Challenges • Mission requirements • Procurement sequence • Multiple designers • Development/communication of criteria • “Consulting Party” concurrence • Points of interface • Building automation system (BAS) • Plant controls • Utility distribution system • Operational constraints • Mission • Physical parameters • Environmental requirements/ restrictions • Fiscal considerations • Export limitations • Optimization elements • CUP equipment deployment in response to campus loads • Campus interaction with PJM grid/ market • Load management in buildings to enhance demand response capability • Practical challenges • Grid separation • Black Start recovery • Building systems status/ restart • Critical load management • Human interaction • Level of automation

  11. ESPC Environmental Benefits • Annual Energy Savings: • Current: 640,000 MMBtu • ESPC III Base: 275,000 MMBtu • Pollution Prevention (annual): • Current: 50,000 metric tons CO2-equivalent • ESPC III Base: 22,000 metric tons CO2-equivalent • Co-Generation reduces GSA NCR Demand: Response during “Gold Days” (approximately 22 MW currently; nearly 33 MW post-ESPC III Base)

  12. Other ESPC Project Benefits • Reduced first-cost to Government • Reduced recurring costs to Government • More energy efficient campus • Fixed accountability for systems performance • Flexibility to meet evolving program requirements • Adaptive re-use of historic structures • Demand response capability ($ to GSA) • Enhanced Energy Security Ability to continue mission independent of the grid

  13. Questions/Discussion • Mel Fernandez, Ph.D., P.E., CEM • Director, Federal Project DevelopmentHoneywell Building Solutions 31 Larks Aire Place The Woodlands, TX Office: 936-273-4483 Cell: 713-202-4850 mel.fernandez@honeywell.com

More Related