1 / 49

Presentation to Trajectory Specs ISSUE Group FOS Structures & Interactions Brussels 27 Sept 2012

Presentation to Trajectory Specs ISSUE Group FOS Structures & Interactions Brussels 27 Sept 2012. Peter Hendrickx Maastricht UAC – Operations peter.hendrickx@eurocontrol.int +31 34 466 1507. Flight Keys. Flight Characteristics. Cleared T. Agreed T. IOP Flight Script.

aggie
Download Presentation

Presentation to Trajectory Specs ISSUE Group FOS Structures & Interactions Brussels 27 Sept 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Presentation to Trajectory Specs ISSUE Group FOS Structures & Interactions Brussels 27 Sept 2012 Peter Hendrickx Maastricht UAC – Operations peter.hendrickx@eurocontrol.int +31 34 466 1507

  2. Flight Keys Flight Characteristics Cleared T Agreed T IOP Flight Script IOP 4D Trajectory (IOP Consistency Check) Other Planning Data Last Downlinked EPP ADS-C Contract Info, ETA min/Max etc Air-Ground Consistency Check Results ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data (ATV Hook) Flight Object Main Structures Flight Object • Proposal • Any other solutions welcome • Why so complicated? • Why so much duplication? Other Shared Data

  3. Flight Keys Flight Characteristics IOP Flight Script IOP 4D Trajectory (IOP Consistency Check) Last Downlinked EPP ADS-C Contract Info, ETA min/Max etc Air-Ground Consistency Check Results ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data (ATV Hooks) Single Reference – Basic Needs Flight Object • T = Trajectory in broad terms • More than 4D line • Can be MT or BT • Gate to Gate • Flag indicates S_T or R_T • 4D: • 2D Flight-path • Levels • Timing Info • Tolerances • Constraints Cleared “T” Agreed “T” Other Planning Data Other Shared Data

  4. Flight Keys Flight Characteristics Cleared T Agreed T IOP Flight Script IOP 4D Trajectory (IOP Consistency Check) Other Planning Data Last Downlinked EPP ADS-C Contract Info, ETA min/Max etc Air-Ground Consistency Check Results ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data (ATV Hooks) Flight Object Main Structures Flight Object GUFI Callsign ADEP ADES EOBT/EOBD Previous/Next GUFI Type/Number Aircraft WTC Flight Type Alternative Aerodromes Special Status (STS) Mil Formation Info Other Shared Data

  5. Flight Keys Flight Characteristics Cleared T Agreed T IOP Flight Script IOP 4D Trajectory (IOP Consistency Check) Other Planning Data Last Downlinked EPP ADS-C Contract Info, ETA min/Max etc Air-Ground Consistency Check Results ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data (ATV Hooks) Flight Object Main Structures Key & X-check elements Flight Object GUFI Callsign ADEP ADES EOBT/EOBD Previous/Next GUFI Type/Number Aircraft WTC Flight Type Alternative Aerodromes Special Status (STS) … Quasi static Other Shared Data

  6. Flight Keys Flight Characteristics Cleared T Agreed T IOP Flight Script IOP 4D Trajectory (IOP Consistency Check) Other Planning Data Last Downlinked EPP ADS-C Contract Info, ETA min/Max etc Air-Ground Consistency Check Results ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data (ATV Hooks) Flight Object Main Structures Flight Object Inside FMS Flown in case of PLOC Departure Clearance + Updates (DSC, verbal re-route) Agreed 3D Hard constraints= CTA, CTOs(TSA Entry/Exit Times) Planning Constraints= TTA, TTOs All with Tolerances Other Shared Data

  7. Flight Keys Flight Characteristics Cleared T Agreed T IOP Flight Script IOP 4D Trajectory (IOP Consistency Check) Last Downlinked EPP ADS-C Contract Info, ETA min/Max etc Air-Ground Consistency Check Results ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data (ATV Hooks) Flight Object Main Structures Flight Object • Used in optimisation of Revisions to get to most optimal solution AO Flight Constraints AO Preferences AO Planning Goals Military Specific Planning Info (TSA, Exercise-type, Time) Other Planning Data Other Shared Data

  8. Flight Keys Flight Characteristics Cleared T Agreed T IOP Flight Script IOP 4D Trajectory (IOP Consistency Check) Last Downlinked EPP ADS-C Contract Info, ETA min/Max etc Air-Ground Consistency Check Results ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data (ATV Hooks) Flight Object Main Structures Flight Object Optimisation for AU (Civ/Mil) • Used in optimisation of Revisions to get to most optimal solution AO Flight Constraints AO Preferences AO Planning Goals Military Specific Planning Info (TSA, Exercise-type, Time) Other Planning Data Other Shared Data

  9. Flight Keys Flight Characteristics Cleared T Agreed T IOP Flight Script IOP 4D Trajectory (IOP Consistency Check) Other Planning Data Last Downlinked EPP ADS-C Contract Info, ETA min/Max etc Air-Ground Consistency Check Results ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data (ATV Hooks) Flight Object Main Structures Flight Object • Shared additional info • Not subject to CDM • Reduces data transfer Complex Constraint Info Original EFPL Free Text NDC Formation Callsigns TSA Reservation ID (ASM System for details) Other Shared Data

  10. Flight Keys Flight Characteristics Cleared T Agreed T IOP Flight Script IOP 4D Trajectory (IOP Consistency Check) Other Planning Data Last Downlinked EPP ADS-C Contract Info, ETA min/Max etc Air-Ground Consistency Check Results ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data (ATV Hooks) Flight Object Main Structures Flight Object Just additional info • Shared additional info • Not subject to CDM • Reduces data transfer Complex Constraint Info Original EFPL Free Text NDC Formation Callsigns TSA Reservation ID (ASM System for details) Other Shared Data

  11. Flight Keys Flight Characteristics Cleared T Agreed T IOP Flight Script IOP 4D Trajectory (IOP Consistency Check) Other Planning Data Last Downlinked EPP ADS-C Contract Info, ETA min/Max etc Air-Ground Consistency Check Results ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data (ATV Hooks) Data LocalATCC – Airport – FOC -NM Flight Object Other Shared Data

  12. Flight Data Record Flight Keys Flight Characteristics AoR Cleared T AoR Agreed T Other Planning Data AOR Last Downlinked EPP ADS-C Contract Info, ETA min/Max etc Local / Upstream Air-Ground Consistency Check Results AOI Flight Script AOI LOCAL TRAJECTORY ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data (ATV Hooks) Other Shared Data ATC Flight Data Record • Large Subset of FO • Local AOI/AOR limited • Other Planning Data = not vital data (initially)= Network/AO relevant • No IOP 4D Trajectory • Local 4D Trajectory, • updated every 4.8 seconds • ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data relevant for Airport Ground System / NM / AO • Only local/Upstream Consistency Check results relevant • Tolerances/Constraints known!!! • Used by Local Tools • Viewed by Local Actors • ATCOs, FMPs, MeSP

  13. FOC-NM Flight Data Record Flight Data Record Flight Keys • Subset of FO • Less relevant: • EPP & related data • IOP 4D Trajectory • Cleared T • Other Shared Data • But available if wanted: • IOP Flight Script • To improve accuracy • IOP 4D Trajectory • Avoid TP computation • Better Monitoring – if wanted Flight Characteristics Cleared T Agreed T Other Planning Data Last Downlinked EPP ADS-C Contract Info, ETA min/Max etc Air-Ground Consistency Check Results IOP Flight Script IOP 4D Trajectory (IOP Consistency Check) ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data (ATV Hooks) Other Shared Data

  14. Cleared “T” Agreed “T” IOP Flight Script IOP 4D Trajectory (IOP Consistency Check) Last Downlinked EPP ADS-C Contract Info, ETA min/Max etc Air-Ground Consistency Check Results ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data (ATV Hook) Structures most relevant to TM Flight Object

  15. Cleared “T” Agreed “T” IOP Flight Script IOP 4D Trajectory (IOP Consistency Check) ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data (ATV Hooks) Non ADS-C Aircraft Flight Object

  16. Cleared “T” Agreed “T” IOP Flight Script IOP 4D Trajectory (IOP Consistency Check) Last Downlinked EPP ADS-C Contract Info, ETA min/Max etc Air-Ground Consistency Check Results ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data (ATV Hooks) EPP Fully consistent Flight Object Downlinked EPP: • 2D Consistent • Levels consistent • TOD/TOC (COL) implemented in Flight Script/Agreed T • Timing used to update Flight Script/Agreed T Present in the background • EPP • ADS-C contract info • consistency check results Not subscribed to by some actors. Same applies locally in Flight Data Record – ATCO CWP Although… contrary initially!!!!

  17. Cleared “T” Agreed “T” IOP Flight Script IOP 4D Trajectory (IOP Consistency Check) Further simplification 1 Flight Object • Ground-segment not yet includedOR • Ground segment embedded in IOP Flight Script • IOP 4D Trajectory: • Sole purpose is IOP ATC-ATC • Not used by anybody else • Just data to support “a” synchronisation mechanism ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data (ATV Hooks)

  18. Cleared “T” Agreed “T” Further simplification 1 Flight Object • Ground segment (ATV Hooks) embedded in IOP Flight Script • IOP 4D Trajectory: • Sole purpose is IOP ATC-ATC • Not used by anybody else • Just data to support “a” synchronisation mechanism IOP Flight Script

  19. Cleared “T” Agreed “T” Further simplification 1 Flight Object • Info is there in the background IOP Flight Script IOP 4D Trajectory ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data

  20. Further simplification 1 Flight Object • Background info not subscribed to by some actors = does not exist for them Cleared “T” Agreed “T” IOP Flight Script

  21. Cleared “T” Agreed “T” Further simplification 2 Flight Object • Cleared “T” is by magic always equal to Agreed “T” • Cleared “T” is by magic synchronised with ATC instructions • By MAGIC = • Initial conditions remain • Advanced AGDL Services (auto CPDLC, auto DSC) • Aircraft flying in “managed” mode • ATCO monitors, does not control IOP Flight Script

  22. Further simplification 2 Flight Object • Cleared “T” is by magic always equal to Agreed “T” • Cleared “T” is by magic synchronised with ATC instructions • By MAGIC = • Initial conditions remain • Advanced AGDL Services (auto CPDLC, auto DSC) • Aircraft flying in “managed” mode • ATCO monitors, does not control Agreed “T” IOP Flight Script

  23. Last simplification Flight Object • Some (non-ATC) actors do not care how ATC does “the job” • Some (ATC) actors: • use OLDI rather then FO mechanism • Use 3 minutes accuracies in Entry Time • Communicate verbally non-standard transfer conditions IOP Flight Script not used Agreed “T” IOP Flight Script

  24. Last simplification Flight Object • Some (non-ATC) actors do not care how ATC does “the job” • Some (ATC) actors: • use OLDI rather then FO mechanism • Use 3 minutes accuracies in Entry Time • Communicate verbally non-standard transfer conditions IOP Flight Script not used Agreed “T” • Background info not subscribed to by these actors IOP Flight Script

  25. Last simplification Flight Object • Some (non-ATC) actors do not care how ATC does “the job” • Some (ATC) actors: • use OLDI rather then FO mechanism • Use 3 minutes accuracies in Entry Time • Communicate verbally non-standard transfer conditions IOP Flight Script not used Agreed “T” • Background info not subscribed to by these actors • = does not exist for them

  26. Single Reference Flight Object • Ideal case • Call this the R_T: RBT/RMT Agreed “T”

  27. Flight Keys Flight Characteristics Single Reference+ Flight Object • Still ideal… Agreed “T”

  28. Flight Keys Flight Characteristics Single Reference++ Flight Object • Still quite ideal !!! Agreed “T” Other Planning Data

  29. Flight Keys Flight Characteristics Single Reference+++ Flight Object • Still quite ideal !!! Agreed “T” Other Planning Data Other Shared Data

  30. Flight Keys Flight Characteristics Single Reference+++* Flight Object • Reality check 1 • Cleared versus Agreed T • Easily manageable !!! Cleared “T” Agreed “T” Other Planning Data Other Shared Data

  31. Flight Keys Flight Characteristics Single Reference+++** Flight Object • Adding ATC-ATC IOP needs • Reality check 1 • To be proven through RTS • Looking good. Cleared “T” Agreed “T” Other Planning Data IOP Flight Script IOP 4D Trajectory ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data Other Shared Data

  32. Flight Keys Flight Characteristics Last Downlinked EPP ADS-C Contract Info, ETA min/Max etc Air-Ground Consistency Check Results Single Reference+++*** Flight Object • Reality check 2 • Air-Ground consistency • Adding ATC-ATC IOP needs • Reality check 1 • Reality check 2 • Air-Ground consistency • ATC-ATC IOP • Adding the wish of every ATCO!!! Cleared “T” Agreed “T” Other Planning Data IOP Flight Script IOP 4D Trajectory ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data Other Shared Data

  33. Flight Keys Flight Characteristics Cleared T Agreed T IOP Flight Script IOP 4D Trajectory (IOP Consistency Check) Other Planning Data Last Downlinked EPP ADS-C Contract Info, ETA min/Max etc Air-Ground Consistency Check Results ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data (ATV Hooks) Our Plan Flight Object • Proposal • Any other solutions welcome • Why so complicated? • Why so much duplication? Other Shared Data

  34. Flight Keys Flight Characteristics Cleared T Agreed T IOP Flight Script IOP 4D Trajectory (IOP Consistency Check) Other Planning Data Last Downlinked EPP ADS-C Contract Info, ETA min/Max etc Air-Ground Consistency Check Results ARR-Gate to DEP-Gate Data (ATV Hooks) Flight Object Main Structures Flight Object • Proposal • Any other solutions welcome • Why so complicated? • Because it is a complicated situation • Solution is not so complicated • Why so much “duplication”? • Temporal differences • Different needs (granularity, presicion) and limitations (update rates) • Non-synchronised processes (not yet) • Step-wise Implementation • Seeking • Support by this “ISSUE” group • CP 3.1. and 3.2. defending the model Other Shared Data

  35. Scenarios • EPP Downlink and Consistency check • Early ending Military Activity • Cracked Windshield • Turbulence – Level Change request • Temporary clearance for separation • Heavy wind – Time deviation • Change of STAR • Hotspot resolution by NM

  36. Principles • FDMP/FDCs/FDUs roles • EPP data used by ATC/Airport to: • Check consistency • Improve ground-held view • Order of accuracy – update rate (H to L) • Trajectory in C-ATSU (tracks) • IOP Flight Script • Agreed T

  37. NM IOP FDMP C-ATSU APT EFB Aircraft SWIM IOP Appl IOP Appl IOP Appl D-ATSU FOC

  38. EPP Consistency Check NM FDMP C-ATSU APT EFB Aircraft SWIM FDC EPP EPP FDC FDU FDC D-ATSU FOC

  39. EPP Consistency Check NM C-ATSU APT EFB Aircraft SWIM FDMP FDC EPP FDC FDU FDC D-ATSU FOC

  40. EPP Consistency Check NM C-ATSU APT EFB Aircraft SWIM FDMP FDC EPP FDC FDU FDC D-ATSU FOC

  41. EPP Consistency Check NM C-ATSU APT EFB Aircraft SWIM FDMP If consistent & If time buffer exceeded: -update IOP Flight Script (with IOP 4D Trajectory for checking FDC FDC FDU FDC If all upstream consistent & Quality increased (MTCD, Flow) D-ATSU FOC

  42. EPP Consistency Check NM C-ATSU APT EFB Aircraft SWIM FDMP If consistent & If time buffer2 exceeded: -update TTO-s in Agreed T FDC FDC FDU FDC D-ATSU FOC

  43. EPP Consistency Check NM C-ATSU APT EFB Aircraft SWIM FDMP FDC FDC FDU FDC D-ATSU Consume updated data FOC

  44. Early availibility Mil Area in D-ATSU NM FDMP C-ATSU APT EFB Aircraft SWIM Graphical Work in Progress - Check next slide FDC EPP FDC FDU FDC D-ATSU FOC

  45. Early availibility Mil Area in D-ATSU Events • Re-routeing proposal prepared by FDC • FDC notices his proposal is outside RBT tolerances • Through FDMP, FDC starts CDM revision on agreed RBT • FOC and NM are triggered • All partners agree • FDMP puts revised RBT in the Flight Object • EPP Consistency set to FALSE • FDMP updates the Flight Script (and Shared 4D Traj) • FDC detects mismatch Agreed-Cleared RBT and flags to ATCO • ATCO uses DSC • C-ATCO uses Route-Clearance • ATCO waits till flight on frequency (Cleared RBT = kept for PLOC) • EPP is downloaded • Cleared RBT updated by FDMP • EPP Consistency Check like in previous scenario (leading to properly better timing)

  46. To be tackled • Where is the Executed Trajectory? • How embed the ARR-Gate to Dep-Gate data? (ATV Hooks) • Develop other scenarios supporting the 4 different processes. • Which EFPL Data fits well / where in FO Structures?

  47. Processes • Air Ground Update Process • Air Ground Revision Process • Ground Ground Update Process • Ground Ground Revision Process

  48. For Info: Correction Loops • Loop1: • Warning to Pilot: stay within tolerances please • Alert to Pilot: respect constraints!!! • Loop2: • Warning to ATCO: try to respect tolerances please • Alert to ATCO: respect constraints!!! • Loop3: • Warning to NM: OK to breach tolerances? • Alert to NM: Find solution for non-respected constraints

  49. Peter Hendrickx Maastricht UAC – Operations peter.hendrickx@eurocontrol.int +31 34 466 1507 End... For now

More Related