1 / 18

C. George Rochester, Ph.D. FDA Anti-Infective Advisory Committee Meeting

Large Comparative Safety Trial in an Usual Care Setting ________________________________________________________________________________________________. C. George Rochester, Ph.D. FDA Anti-Infective Advisory Committee Meeting Mathematical Statistician, Division of Biometrics III

Download Presentation

C. George Rochester, Ph.D. FDA Anti-Infective Advisory Committee Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Large Comparative Safety Trialin an Usual Care Setting________________________________________________________________________________________________ C. George Rochester, Ph.D. FDA Anti-Infective Advisory Committee Meeting Mathematical Statistician, Division of Biometrics III January 8, 2003 RochesterG@cder.fda.gov

  2. Study 3014:Elements of Study Design (1)_______________________________________________________________________________________________ • Randomized, comparative, open-label • Community-acquired respiratory tract infections: CAP, AECB, or AS • Approximately 12,000 subjects per arm • Telithromycin (TEL) 800 mg qd orally x 5 days for AS; 7-10 days for CAP or AECB • Comparator: Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC) 875 mg/125 mg bid x 7-10 days for all indications FDA Anti-Infective AC Meeting

  3. Elements of Study Design (2)_______________________________________________________________________________________________ • Usual care setting with relaxed inclusion and exclusion criteria and included subjects with CARTIs • Indication distribution: 10% CAP, 30% AECB, 60% AS • Target: -  40% subjects with CAP/AECB, -  35% subjects  50 years of age • Subjects with cardiovascular disease, renal or hepatic impairment, and concomitant drug use, such as, subjects taking that inhibit or are metabolized by CYP3A4 or CYP2D6 FDA Anti-Infective AC Meeting

  4. Definition of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) _________________________________________________________________________ FDA Anti-Infective AC Meeting

  5. Overall Adverse Event Rates_______________________________________________________________________________________________ • Phase 3 trials:  50% of subjects had AEs • Study 3014: had many subjects with co-morbidities - diabetes, renal or hepatic impairment, cardiovascular disease, many concomitant drugs  23% of subjects had AEs • Subjects with CAP accounted for 10% of study population • Usual care setting - population may be more heterogenous than those enrolled in previous phase 3 trials FDA Anti-Infective AC Meeting

  6. Adverse Events: Subgroups____________________________ FDA Anti-Infective AC Meeting

  7. Hepatic AESI: Investigation Process_______________________________________________________________________________________________ • Hepatic laboratory testing was done at Pretherapy (Day 1) and Post-therapy (Day 17-22) clinic visits • Alteration in hepatic laboratory values of increase in ALT > 3xULN was used to flag potential hepatic AESIs • Follow-up to return to baseline or “sufficient decline” was done for subjects with potential hepatic AESI - 6 months • Management algorithms were not utilized: could have guided investigators with minimum expectation for follow-up of AEs and minimize missing critical data and improve completeness of case documentation • Adjudication by blinded CECs was planned at regular intervals but was largely done in batch at the end of the trial FDA Anti-Infective AC Meeting

  8. Hepatic AESI Resolution____________________________ FDA Anti-Infective AC Meeting

  9. Changes in ALT: Normal Baseline____________________________ FDA Anti-Infective AC Meeting

  10. Changes in AST: Normal Baseline____________________________ FDA Anti-Infective AC Meeting

  11. Changes in Hepatic Analytes at any Post-Therapy Time Point____________________________________________________________________________________ FDA Anti-Infective AC Meeting

  12. Combined ALT and Bilirubin Changes at any Post-Therapy Time Point____________________________________________________________________________________ FDA Anti-Infective AC Meeting

  13. Changes in ALT among Telithromycin-treated Subjects: By Duration____________________________ FDA Anti-Infective AC Meeting

  14. Subjects who Met Hepatic Endpoint Definition_______________________________________________________________________________________________ • Subjects who met the definition of a possibly drug related hepatic event: • TEL: 3/12,096 (95% C.I., 0.5 - 7.2/10,000) • AMC: 2/11,883 (95% C.I., 0.2 - 6.1/10,000) FDA Anti-Infective AC Meeting

  15. Case # 0187-026___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ FDA Anti-Infective AC Meeting

  16. Case # 3440-001___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ FDA Anti-Infective AC Meeting

  17. Case 2004-002___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ FDA Anti-Infective AC Meeting

  18. Summary ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ • Hepatic AESIs were uncommon ( about 1%) of subjects exposed to telithromycin • Telithromycin appeared similar to AMC with elevations in hepatic analytes (specifically, ALT) up to 3 x ULN • More extreme elevations in ALT (> 8 x ULN) were slightly more common among telithromycin treated subjects • A minority of subjects were symptomatic in both treatment arms • There were no cases of liver failure or deaths among hepatic cases • At the 6 month follow-up no subjects were reported with known sequelae, one telithromycin-treated subject had persistent RUQ tenderness on examination x 6 months FDA Anti-Infective AC Meeting

More Related