180 likes | 344 Views
Utility ExperienceMarket forcesFinancial Capability AssessmentEPA Guidance RevisionsNACWA advocacyNegotiation implicationsConclusions. Presentation Outline. Utility ExperienceMarket forcesFinancial Capability AssessmentEPA Guidance RevisionsNACWA advocacyNegotiation implicationsConclusions.
E N D
1. Utility Experience to DateAnd How It Can Help EPA Refocus Its Financial Capability Assessment Guidance
2. Utility Experience
Market forces
Financial Capability Assessment
EPA Guidance Revisions
NACWA advocacy
Negotiation implications
Conclusions Presentation Outline
3. Utility Experience
Market forces
Financial Capability Assessment
EPA Guidance Revisions
NACWA advocacy
Negotiation implications
Conclusions Presentation Outline
4. Utility ExperienceMarket forces are imposing unprecedented financial challenges Withdrawal of fed/state support
Cost increases
O&M costs
Labor, health care
Electricity, chemicals
Capital
Construction cost escalation
Multitude of requirements
CSO, SSO, stormwater, asset management
Market saturation via multiple programs in region
5. Utility Experience Construction costs rose significantly from 2000-2006
6. Utility ExperienceWater and wastewater rates are projected to continue outpacing inflation
7. 7 Utility Experience Consent decree compliance imposes significant community disruption
8. Utility ExperienceEPA responses to financial capability issues has been highly variable In Cincinnati, financial capacity was employed to determine program spending limitations in consent decree negotiation
9. Utility ExperienceFinancial capability a central concern in ongoing negotiations
10. Utility Experience
Market forces
Financial Capability Assessment
EPA Guidance Revisions
NACWA advocacy
Negotiation implications
Conclusions Presentation Outline
11. EPA Guidance RevisionsPast inconsistencies & myopia have prompted call for change Regulators
Focus on discrete regulation enforcement
Varying experience & attitudes
Non-recognition of resource constraints or alternative community investment options
Utilities
Historic under-pricing and under-investment
Variances in community circumstances, priorities and negotiation approaches
12. 12 EPA Guidance Revisions NACWA Guiding Principles Economic Capability
First consideration must be the community’s economic situation.
Economic capability must be assessed in light of other investments and potential environmental benefit.
Improvements should mitigate potential adverse impact of their cost on distressed populations.
Program Scope and Timetable
Scope and implementation schedule must be tailored to community’s unique financial condition.
Considering financial capability in light of other investment demands and potential benefits ensures greatest water quality improvement at the earliest possible time.
13. EPA Guidance Revisions A Portfolio Management approach to environmental investment is suggested May help ensure highest returns within communities’ financial constraints
Dispels myth that any regulation warrants enforcement if net environmental benefit will be realized
Recognizes that environmental investments with benefit/cost ratios >1 is a necessary but not a sufficient condition to warrant resource allocation
Framework enables recognition of non-monetary benefits and costs
14. 14 EPA Guidance Revisions DRAFT Portfolio Management Framework
15. EPA Guidance Revisions Negotiation implications Projected costs and compliance must be considered holistically
Illegitimacy of prosecution of individual sections of CWA
Program schedules must be malleable
Cost estimate updating
Evolving financial capabilities
Availability of higher-return environmental investment options
Rate structure options alone can not mitigate impacts on distressed populations
16. Utility Experience
Market forces
Financial Capability Assessment
EPA Guidance Revisions
NACWA advocacy
Negotiation implications
Conclusions Presentation Outline
17. ConclusionsFinancial capability assessment requires fundamental change Current regulatory and environmental policies are of questionable merit given impacts that:
challenge communities’ financial capabilities
lead to sub-optimal resource investments
may deprive services to economically disadvantaged
An alternative, portfolio management approach to environmental investments is warranted
Limited adjustments to flawed, prescriptive methodology would defeat public policy objectives
18. Utility Experience to DateAnd How It Can Help EPA Refocus Its Financial Capability Assessment Guidance
19. Eric Rothstein, CPAGalardi Rothstein Group