1 / 34

Constraints on PDF uncertainties from CDF DIS 2006, Tsukuba 22.04.2006 Cigdem Issever for the

Constraints on PDF uncertainties from CDF DIS 2006, Tsukuba 22.04.2006 Cigdem Issever for the CDF Collaboration University of Oxford. Outline. Introduction Tevatron & CDF detector EWK Results (95% of the talk)

adonai
Download Presentation

Constraints on PDF uncertainties from CDF DIS 2006, Tsukuba 22.04.2006 Cigdem Issever for the

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Constraints on PDF uncertainties from CDF DIS 2006, Tsukuba 22.04.2006 Cigdem Issever for the CDF Collaboration University of Oxford

  2. Outline • Introduction • Tevatron & CDF detector • EWK Results (95% of the talk) • Jet results (see talk “Inclusive jet production at the Tevatron (CDF)” of Olga Norniella in (HFS-5)) • Conclusion C. Issever

  3. Chicago  Booster CDF DØ Tevatron p source Main Injector (new) Tevatron proton-antiproton collisions s = 1.96 TeV (Run I  1.8 TeV) 36 bunches: 396 ns crossing time Peak luminosity is now ~ 1032 cm-2 s-1 Ultimately 4 – 9 fb-1 by 2009 C. Issever

  4. CDF Recorded Data Jet results with 1.0 fb-1 1.6 fb-1 delivered 1.2 fb-1 recorded EWK results C. Issever

  5. CDF RUN II Detector • Upgraded for RUN II • New silicon tracking • New drift chamber • Increased muon coveraged • New TOF • New plug calorimeters Muon COT Tracker Si Detector PLUG EM Cal Had Cal CDF Data taking effi 80% - 85%. Silicon Detector C. Issever

  6. EWK Physics – Input to PDFs Motivation • Test SM (precise measurements) • Constraints on PDFs • Search for physics beyond SM • Important input to LHC Outlook • W forward cross section, 223/pb • Z →ττ and μμ cross Section, 330/pb • W charge asymmetry, 170/pb C. Issever

  7. ET>25GeV W/Z Gauge Bosons Identification • At hadronic collider W and Z bosons hadronic decays are overwhelmed by QCD background.  identification through leptonic decays We Z ET>20GeV PT>20GeV Position of μ consistent with extrapolated track PT>20GeV W±signature: Isolated Energetic Lepton + ET Z Signature: Two Isolated Energetic Leptons (opposite charge) C. Issever

  8. W cross section in the forward region Extension into forward region: 1.2 < |η| < 2.8 using calorimeter seeded tracking Complementary to central C. Issever

  9. W cross section in the forward region Systematics on A = 0.2567: 48165 ~4.8% 2% 0.07 Axε C. Issever

  10. W cross section in the forward region 223pb-1 σ = 2.796 +/-0.013(stat) + 0.095 – 0.090 (syst) +/- 0.168 (lum.)nb. NNLO σ(pp→W) @ 1.96 TeV, Stirling, van Neerven = 2.687 +- 0.054(Th) C. Issever

  11. Central-to-Forward W vis. cross section ratio s(visible)=sTOT*A where A is the kin. and geo accept. • Strategy: assign sys uncertainties but PDF, NLO/NNLO effect to svis • In this way: • Most of the luminosity uncertainty cancels in the ratio • All other uncertainties are uncorrelated • Accuracy can be used to constrain PDFs C. Issever

  12. Central-to-Forward W vis. cross section ratio • svis(central) =664.2±11.7 pb(Ete>25, ETn>25, |hele|<1) • svis(forward) =718±21 pb(Ete>20, ETn>25, 1.2<|hele|<2.8) • svis(central)/svis(forward) =0.925±0.033 • 1% assigned as luminosity syst. (slightly overestimate) • NLO ratios (taking into account correlations between central and forward): • CTEQ= 0.9243±0.037 • MRST01E= 0.94137±0.011 • Most uncertainties will go down with more data  useful to constrain PDFs C. Issever

  13. Z → μμ cross section (|η| < 1) using 337 pb-1 337pb-1 116 66 σ=261.2 ± 2.7 (stat) + 5.8 - 6.9 (sys) ± 15.1 (lum) pb NNLO @ 1.96 TeV Stirling, van Neerven σ(pp→Z)=251.3+-0.5(Th) C. Issever

  14. Z →τeτh cross section using 349 pb-1 • 316 signal events • 60 % τ identification efficiency and 5% acceptance • Most systematics are data driven will be reduced with more stat. σ=265+-20(stat)+-21(syst)+-15(lumi) pb C. Issever

  15. Cross section summary new C. Issever

  16. e+ W+ W+ W- proton anti-proton n yW antiproton proton W Charge Asymmetry Asymmetry in W production complicated by unknown n pz use lepton asymmetry: which convolves W production with V-A decay. C. Issever

  17. W Charge Asymmetry Run II 170pb-1 A as function of ET provides better probe of x dependence. Statistic allowed two bins. Will be included into next generation of PDFs. C. Issever

  18. W Charge Asymmetry – new method Lepton asymmetry has turn over at high |η| due to V-A W charge asymmetry does not have this effect, so we don’t purely probe high yW • Determination of yW with W mass constrain gives 2 possible solutions. • Evaluate weight factor F1,2 for each y1,2 solution. • Parameterize F1,2 with • the angular distribution of (1+-cosΘ*)2 • with W cross section, σ(yW), but this depends on asymmetry • Iterative procedure!! C. Issever

  19. W charge asymmetry – new method Iterative procedure • Smaller statistical errors • Greater sensitivity • No additional systematics due to new method C. Issever

  20. Jet Midpoint jet cross section Good agreement with NLO More details see talk of Olga Norniella in (HFS-5): Jets 1 C. Issever

  21. Results with KT: Data/NLO; 1fb-1 IR and CL safe No splitting or merging Measurements in the forward region will allow to reduce the PDFs uncertainties C. Issever

  22. Conclusions New cross section measurements from CDF • W → eν in forward region (1.2 < |η| < 2.8) using 223 pb-1 • Central-to-forward W vis cross section ratio • Z → μμ using 337 pb-1 • Z → τeτh using 349pb-1 • Inclusive Jets with Mitpoint using 1.04 fb-1 • Inclusive Jet s with Kt algorithm using 0.96 fb-1 Excellent base for next set of analyses • dσ/dy for W → eν • dσ/dpt for Z → μμ • Tau widely used in SM measurements and SUSY, Higgs New generation of W&Z measurements (R, W Charge Asymmetry, … ) on the way !! C. Issever

  23. Backup Slides C. Issever

  24. W forward cross section C. Issever

  25. Z → μμ cross section (|η| < 1) C. Issever

  26. Z →τeτh cross section • taus difficult to reconstruct at hadron colliders • Z→ττ exploits event topology to suppress backgrounds (QCD&W+jet) CDF strategy for hadronic tau reconstruction: • Charge tracks  define signal and isolation cone (shrinking cone vs. E) isolation: require no tracks in isolation cone • Hadronic calorimeter cluster (to suppress e background) • π0 required in isolation cone (identified by shower maximum detector) = 30o • Z→ττ event selection: • τ→e: electron + isolated track (ET>10 GeV) • τ→h: PT(seed) > 6 GeV & PT(signal)>15 GeV • remove backgrounds by event topology cuts C. Issever

  27. Z→ττ cross section C. Issever

  28. Z→ττ cross section -- Systematics C. Issever

  29. W Asymmetry – new method Leading order W production from Bo Young Han C. Issever

  30. I.The angular distribution of ( )2 from W production • in Collin-Soper frame • The W production Probability from angular distribution ratio of two angular distributions at each rapidity from Bo Young Han C. Issever

  31. II. Weight must also depend on W+- cross-section. • But cross-sections depend on W asymmetry! • This method must be iterated. III. Iteration procedure Input data reconstruction measuring asymmetry if no, min( ) F1 Fn the closest asymmetry to data assumed sample new assumed sample No Yes from Bo Young Han C. Issever

  32. Sensitivity Study • , 400pb-1 MC data generated by Pythia • Selecting W events • high PT electron : ET > 25 GeV • Missing ET > 25 GeV • Used CTEQ6M errors PDF 40 sets for PDF uncertainty • Comparison of statistical uncertainty between lepton and W boson asymmetry • Our method has statistical sensitivity to probe PDFs from Bo Young Han C. Issever

  33. Systematic Uncertainty Weight Factors depend on Q(yW, PtW) and σ(yW) • Ratio of two angular distributions, Q(yW, PtW) • PDF dependence • W cross section, σ(yW) • PDF dependence from Bo Young Han C. Issever

  34. Systematic Uncertainty (cont.) The uncertainties from the energy measurement • Energy scale • Energy resolution (not yet) • Electron ET scale • ±0.1%(1σ) : |η| < 1.1 • ±0.15%(1σ) : |η| > 1.1 • Missing ET scale • W boson Recoil energy tuning from Bo Young Han C. Issever

More Related