1 / 18

Improving stop and search?

Improving the conduct of stop and search Dr Paul Quinton, NPIA Prof Betsy Stanko, Metropolitan Police Cmdr Tony Eastaugh, Metropolitan Police. Improving stop and search?. Effectiveness. Legitimacy. Fairness. Lawfulness. Stop and search levels. 1.3m S&S encounters. Source: Bradford 2012.

adelie
Download Presentation

Improving stop and search?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Improving the conduct of stop and search Dr Paul Quinton, NPIAProf Betsy Stanko, Metropolitan PoliceCmdr Tony Eastaugh, Metropolitan Police

  2. Improving stop and search? Effectiveness Legitimacy Fairness Lawfulness

  3. Stop and search levels 1.3m S&S encounters Source: Bradford 2012

  4. Stop and search arrest rates Source: Bradford 2012

  5. Improving effectiveness? • Limited & inconclusive evidence • Arrest rate from PACE searches = 9% •  S&S numbers =  arrest rate • At force level, there is no association between S&S rates & crime rates • Focused policing activity in crime hot spots can reduce crime • Would better targeted S&S be more effective? Would it affect fairness?

  6. Improving lawfulness? • Code A focuses on how to conduct a S&S, not when • Reasonable suspicion is elastic & difficult to define • The same standard is required for an arrest • But observational research suggests some searches are based on weak grounds • Possible reasons? • Officer discretion & low visibility to supervisors • The law not reflecting the realities of policing • Decision-making based on practical rules-of-thumb • The specificity of suspect descriptions & intelligence briefings • Traditional class room based training • Few consequences

  7. Improving fairness? • Qualitative research suggests the public’s support for S&S is conditional on: • how S&S is used & targeted by the police • the attitudes & behaviour of the officers involved • the reasons for S&S being valid, genuine & credible • Negative experiences were more common than positive experiences & more easily remembered • Key issues for the public: • Experience of officers being patronising, arrogant, aggressive & intimidating • Not being given a reason for an encounter • Feeling unfairly targeted

  8. Why is fairness important? • Experiences of policing shape public motivations to cooperate with police & not break the law • Fair decision-making & respectful treatment can enhance police legitimacy, which helps to: • build a sense of shared values • make people feel valued by & part of society • create a sense of obligation & responsibility • Unfair treatment sends out a clear message… Our rules do not apply to you – you’re not a valued member of society!

  9. Why is fairness important? Risk of sanction Legitimacy Obligation to obey Trust in police effectiveness Compliance & cooperation Moral alignment with police Trust in police fairness Personal morality

  10. Why is fairness important? Risk of sanction Legitimacy Obligation to obey Trust in police effectiveness Compliance & cooperation Moral alignment with police Trust in police fairness Personal morality

  11. Why is fairness important? Risk of sanction Legitimacy Obligation to obey Trust in police effectiveness Compliance & cooperation Moral alignment with police Trust in police fairness Personal morality

  12. Why is fairness important? Risk of sanction Legitimacy Obligation to obey Trust in police effectiveness Compliance & cooperation Moral alignment with police Trust in police fairness Personal morality

  13. Why is fairness important? Risk of sanction Legitimacy Obligation to obey Trust in police effectiveness Compliance & cooperation Moral alignment with police Trust in police fairness Personal morality

  14. Why is fairness important? Risk of sanction Legitimacy Obligation to obey Trust in police effectiveness Compliance & cooperation Moral alignment with police Trust in police fairness Personal morality

  15. National survey results Risk of sanction Legitimacy Obligation to obey Trust in police effectiveness Compliance & cooperation Moral alignment with police Trust in police fairness Personal morality

  16. The impact of S&S on trust • The effect of police contact on trust is asymmetrical • Bad contact is very bad • Good contact is only a little bit good (at best)

  17. The bottom line • By making fair decisions, explaining them & being respectful, the police can encourage people to be more socially responsible • This is not just about being nice! • Fair encounters may not be enough – legacy issues & the volume of police contact • There are significant risks of being unfair • ‘Trust arrives on foot & leave on horseback’ • What goes around, comes around – fairness at work

  18. What might help? • There are significant gaps in the evidence base • Robust studies are needed to find out ‘what works’ • A newly formed NPIA / MPS collaboration to test an intervention aimed at improving the conduct of S&S • Scripted encounters? • Queensland random breath test experiment • Practice based & reflective learning? • Chicago quality interaction training experiment • GMP / NPIA victim contact training experiment • More active supervision? • Better targeting towards crime hot spots?

More Related