conceptual database system for urban model development applications l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Conceptual database system for urban model development & applications PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Conceptual database system for urban model development & applications

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 50

Conceptual database system for urban model development & applications - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 212 Views
  • Uploaded on

COST 728 Workshop Exeter, England May 3,4, 2007. Conceptual database system for urban model development & applications. Jason Ching ARL/NOAA –NERL/USEPA Research Triangle Park, NC ching.jason@epa.gov. Presentation outline CAVEAT: mostly generic but contains some USA perspectives.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Conceptual database system for urban model development & applications' - adamdaniel


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
conceptual database system for urban model development applications

COST 728 Workshop

Exeter, England

May 3,4, 2007

Conceptual database system for urban model development & applications

Jason Ching

ARL/NOAA –NERL/USEPA

Research Triangle Park, NC

ching.jason@epa.gov

presentation outline caveat mostly generic but contains some usa perspectives
Presentation outlineCAVEAT: mostly generic but contains some USA perspectives
  • Background: “Setting the stage”
  • Rationale for a “database” focus
  • Database content/concepts
  • Prototype implementation of “NUDAPT” (National Urban Database and Access Portal Tools)
guiding principles
Guiding Principles
  • Each model application is unique.
  • The scale resolution of the modeling must be appropriate to the task (Use the right tools!)
  • Current and future urban applications may require tools/techniques not yet available or under development; e.g., urban to local scale
  • Hierarchical (nesting or adaptable gridding) approaches usually necessary.
  • Appropriate data needed for modeling - both development and operational.
addressing societal issues with urban modeling focus
Addressing societal issues with urban modeling focus
  • Air Quality –Health
    • Exposure assessments
    • Policy and Controls
    • Acute to chronic time scales
  • Homeland security
    • Transport on episodic bases
  • Urban impact on climate change
    • Growth
    • Urban heat island and its mitigation
background the problem
Background: The “Problem”
  • To predict and characterize transport and concentration fields in urban areas
    • Models must be commensurate with scale of the transport and concentration gradients- Scale hierarchy
    • Current situation: Urban modeling too coarse a scale, boundary layer closure schemes, model descriptions were overly coarse and simplistic for real cities
    • Urban land use, land classification schemes limited, also overly simplistic
    • Urban complexities such as street canyons control exposures in urban areas
    • Urban areas evolve, some very rapidly
  • Advanced modeling tools are needed for future urban application requirements; a myriad of problems remains unsatisfactorily addressable without adequate and or appropriate tools.
    • Data sets are not homogeneous (geospatial, activity, population, …)
    • Variety of model urbanization approaches have recently been implemented into mesoscale models. Testing, evaluation will lead to improved model description of physics and thermodynamics and model engineering and reutilization of database.
    • Operational urban models need to balance the overly simplistic to highly sophisticated parameterizations of urban features.
  • Situation provides intriguing opportunities!
slide8

METHODOLOGY: Meso-urban scale modeling

Modeler Needs:

To capture the area-average effect of the urban area in mesoscale atmospheric models

Solution:

Modelers have implemented urban canopy parameterizations into their models (e.g., MM5, WRF, HOTMAC, RAMS, COAMPS…)

Salt Lake City, UT (Don Green Photography)

slide9

NEIGHBORHOOD SCALES

Urban canopy details can not be represented: Parameterize the urban surface effects.

Majority of pollutants emitted inside roughness sub-layer: Necessitates good precision on meteorological fields.

Ground conditions in mesoscale model not satisfactory at neighborhood scale: apply drag-force and land use features at urban scales

Meso scale

Neighborhood scale

1 km.

Roughness Sub-Layer

Local scale

Rural

Rural

Urban

slide10

ISSUE: Relating meso-urban to building scale

Buildings distributed in 1 km grid.

Mesoscale: Model produces single meteorology profile applicable to grid cell

Results influenced by the presence and aggregated effects of buildings.

Building scale: Intra-cell flow fields will be highly variable (horizontally and vertically), influenced by the individual buildings.

slide11

An implementation:

DA-SM2U in MM5 (Gayno-Seaman sub-system)

o Urbanization introduced at grid sizes of ~1km using drag approach (DA)

o Land surface model (SM2-U)

o Additional, within canopy layers

slide13

Vegetation plan area density

Roof area density

Building plan area density

Building frontal area density

Vegetation area density

Introduction of canopy concepts and urban morphology parameters make possible improved modeling

The knowledge of the vertical and horizontal distribution of the different urban land cover modes is necessary.

Urban canopy parameterization

slide15

We have technology and

means for obtaining building

data at high resolution; such

data and ancillary data are

becoming increasingly more

available for our major cities

High resolution urban

morphological data

from lidar mapping

and photogrammetric

techniques

slide16

ALTMS Normal Operating Parameters

210-240kph

915m AGL

GPS Ground Station

Swath width = 625m

30 km radius

3 m spacing

111,000 points/sq.km.

10-30% overlap

profiling
Profiling

* Record Longest Return

* Normally Rotary Wing

* Continuous Ground Coverage

gridded 1 km urban canopy parameters ucp from high resolution data for urbanized mm5
Gridded (1 km)Urban Canopy Parameters (UCP) from high resolution data for urbanized MM5

*Parameters used in RA formulations Height dependent UCP

slide19

Selected Urban Canopy Parameters per 1 km2 cells for Harris County, TX

NOTE! Each grid cell has unique combination of UCPs

slide20

Sensitivity study: Comparison ofresults using

DA-SM2U (UCP version) Standard MM5 (RA)

MM5 Sensible Heat Flux (w/UCP)

MM5 PBL w/UCP

MM5 PBL (RA)

MM5 Sensible Heat Flux (RA)

air quality model cmaq at fine scales
Air Quality Model (CMAQ) at fine scales
  • Pollutant model simulations are sensitive to (and dependent on) grid resolution
  • AQ simulations depend on outputs of meteorological models which in turn depend on model descriptions of physics and thermodynamics.
ozone 1 km gridded cmaq simulations @ 2100 gmt ucp noucp difference ucp noucp
Ozone (1 km gridded CMAQ simulations) @ 2100 GMTUCP noUCP Difference (UCP-noUCP)
  • Significant differences in the spatial patterns shown between UCP and noUCP runs (titration effect occurs in both sets)
  • Flow, thermodynamics & turbulent fields differ between the UCP and noUCP simulations & contribute to differences
fundamental urban model engineering design requirements
Fundamental urban model engineering design requirements
  • Urban morphological structures:
    • Form and pressure drag from obstacles
    • Reflective, radiative and thermodynamic properties of buildings, roofs, paved surface areas, street canyons
  • Land surfaces:
    • Soils
    • Vegetative canopy
    • Degree of imperviousness to moisture
    • Surface propertiesThermal resistivities, ground storage
  • Land cover classes:
    • Apt model descriptors and classifications
    • Grid coverage: Dominant vs fractional area methodology
  • Anthropogenic heating
database concepts
Database Concepts
  • Bases for implementing descriptive parameterizations at appropriate scales
    • High resolution building and other urban morphological features
    • Sets of urban canopy parameterizations for various advanced meteorological modeling
    • Tools to generate UCPs for generalized gridding and reference systems
    • Community based, flexible and encouraging of collaborative studies to improving urban scale modeling and facilitating their scientific acceptance
    • Supports hierarchical (nesting) approaches from mesoscale (regional) to urban scale to applications requiring CFD type approaches
    • Provide for evaluation- at appropriate scales
  • Facilitates advanced, scale dependent applications
    • Transboundary to regional to urban to neighborhood
    • Forecast WX and air quality in urban areas
    • Air quality (Transboundary-regional-urban–to local)
    • Dispersion (vectors to agents)
    • Exposure (personal, population, air pollutants, agents)
    • Urban planning (mitigating intensity of heat islands)
prototypic implementation the nudapt framework
Prototypic ImplementationThe “NUDAPT” Framework
  • Urban modeling is its major focus
  • Adopts a community system paradigm-
    • Encourages collaborations, accelerates model advancements with Portal technology
    • Supports various meteorological modeling systems, others are possible
    • Broad user base (Model developers to users)
    • Extensible (to smaller scales, to current and future city structures, to revised sets of UCPs)
  • Database consists of primary and derived parameters
    • High resolution geospatial data: repository or links (133 cities in USA)
    • Appropriate and complete set of parameterizations at urban grid scale
    • Ancillary data (to facilitate applications)
    • Allowance for evaluation, operational utility
  • Features include basic processing methodologies and tools
  • Selected cities serves as example prototypes to highlight capabilities and features
nudapt portal two systems one whole
NUDAPT Portal: Two systems, One Whole
  • Quickplace
    • Powerful, flexible collaboration suite
    • Built-in security controls, file sharing ability
    • Leverages existing EPA Lotus Domino technology
  • Data Download Portal
    • Delivers server-side data processing, minimizing or eliminating the need for desktop GIS
    • Responsive data exploration map viewer
    • Relies on ESRI’s ArcGIS Server technology
quickplace summary
Quickplace Summary
  • Collaboration tool – what the group gets out depends on what the individual puts in
  • Easy to share documents, model results, smaller datasets (less than 200MB), presentations, etc
  • Available calendar/task management tools
  • Help build consensus on UCP methods and strategies
  • Tool lets you manage the collaboration
data download portal
Data Download Portal
  • Map
    • AJAX for smooth dragging and zooming
    • Built-in identify, measure, and magnify tools
    • Dynamic table of contents
  • Data repository
    • Quickly import data, add to map, publish to web
    • Tightly integrated with windows security
    • GIS tools allow fast, easy data pre-processing
data download tool inputs
Data Download Tool Inputs
  • Input Raster or Basket of Rasters
  • Clip Extent
  • Output Coordinate Reference System
  • Resampling Method
  • Output Cell Size
  • Output File Format
clip extent
Clip Extent
  • Draw extent directly on the map
  • Tool uses bounding box envelope
  • Envelope projected into spatial reference of raster and output
  • Could investigate taking extent input in Lat/Long instead
output coordinate reference system
Output Coordinate Reference System
  • Initially contains only four systems, all NAD83
    • Geographic Latitude/Longitude
    • UTM Zone 15N
    • USGS Albers Equal Area
    • South Central Texas State Plane (Feet)
  • ESRI Library contains hundreds, all could be added in a few minutes
  • Also have option of leaving all rasters in source projection
resampling method
Resampling Method
  • Nearest Neighbor
  • Bilinear Interpolation
  • Cubic Convolution
download processing flow
Download Processing Flow

Input

Extent

Polygon

Get

Feature

Envelope

Clip

Extent

Project

Feature

Projected

Envelope

Input

Raster

Clipped

Raster

Clip Raster

Projected

Clip Extent

Get

Feature

Envelope

Output

Coordinate

System

Resampling

Method

Project

Raster

Projected

Raster

Clip Raster

Clipped

Raster

Output

Cell Size

Convert

Raster to

Other Format

Output

Raster

Zip

Output

Zip File

Output

File Format

output cell size
Output Cell Size
  • All rasters will be resampled to user-specified output cell size
  • If no cell size specified, all rasters will remain at source resolution
  • Regardless of input, no output will have smaller cell size than the minimum output resolution cutoff (15m)
  • Minimum resolution determined by security restrictions
output file format
Output File Format
  • Available formats are:
    • NetCDF
    • ASCII
    • Floating Point
    • Imagine Image
    • GeoTiff
  • All output files (rasters, header files, metadata) are zipped for download
  • Binary results “key” allows you to pick up output later
nudapt tools
NUDAPT Tools
  • Generalized methodology for alternative sets of UCPs
  • Spatial allocation for (generalized regridding and grid geo-referencing capability
  • Portal system and Internet collaboration
extrapolating ucps to areas without data
Extrapolating UCPs to Areas Without Data
  • More than 90% grids in the modeling domain do not have UCP data.
  • UCPs correlated to underlying land use in areas where base data existed and then extrapolated to other areas by area-weighted averaging (from Ching, Burian).
  • Building UCPs correlated to population (e.g., day, night, worker) at 250-m and 1-km resolution (Burian).
  • GIS Extrapolation Tool are programmed with models selected based on fit to data, testing results, and judgment to estimate UCPs based on population and land use (Burian).
nudapt ancillary data resources
NUDAPT ancillary data resources
  • Anthropogenic heating (component of model thermodynamics)
    • Gridded (3-D)
    • Daily
    • Diurnal
    • Seasonal
  • Population (Exposure applications)
    • Day
    • Night
  • Advanced land use data, systems (Model evaluation, urban planning applications)
    • 100 City studies
    • Transims
ucps for mm5 see earlier
UCPs for MM5 (see earlier)
  • Mean and standard deviation of building and vegetation height
  • Plan-area weighted mean building and vegetation height
  • Building height histograms
  • Plan area fraction and frontal area index at ground level
  • Plan area density, top area density, and frontal area density
  • Complete aspect ratio
  • Building area ratio
  • Building height-to-width ratio
  • Sky view factor at ground level and as a function of height
  • Aerodynamic roughness length and displacement height (Raupach, Macdonald, Bottema, Coefficient)
  • Mean orientation of streets
  • Surface fraction of vegetation, roads, rooftops, and water and impervious area, directly connected impervious area, albedo and building material using remote sensing
ucps for urbanized wrf
UCPs for urbanized WRF
  • Urban fraction
  • Building height, ZR
  • Roughness for momentum above the urban canopy layer, Z0C
  • Roughness for heat above the urban canopy layer Z0HC
  • Zero-displacement height above the urban canopy layer, ZDC
  • Percentage of urban canopy, PUC
  • Sky view factor, SVF
  • Building coverage ratio (roof area ratio), R
  • Normalized building height, HGT
  • Drag coefficient by buildings, CDS
  • Buildings volumetric parameter, AS
  • Anthropogenic heat, AH
  • Heat capacity of the roof, wall, and road
  • Heat conductivity of the roof, wall, and road
  • Albedo of the roof, wall, and road
  • Emissive of the roof, wall, and road
  • Roughness length for momentum of the roof, wall, and road
  • Roughness length for heat of the roof, wall, and road
other model systems
Other model systems
  • Canadian model based on TEB
  • Global model with urban features
  • COAMPS
  • Advanced urbanized WRF with canopy-drag formulations
  • Others?
prototypes by urban area
Prototypes- by urban area
  • Houston
    • High resolution building data base
    • DA-SM2U/MM5; uMM5, urbanized WRF, urban components in Global, urbanized COAMPS, Canadian (TEB)
    • Coastal, bay breeze geo-climate
    • FDDA sea surface temperatures
    • Anthropogenic heating
    • Day-night population
    • Model evaluation databases TEXAS 2000, 2006
    • Model sensitivity studies to input of urbanized met model fields
      • CMAQ AQ studies
      • Dispersion (HPAQ and HySplit)
      • Exposure assessments (AQ –hospital admissions study)
  • Phoenix
    • Mountain valley flow regime
    • Rapid urbanization
    • Urbanized DA-SM2U/MM5
    • Urban heat island mitigation studies
    • Utilizes MODIS and ASTER data
  • Atlanta
    • Either urbanized MM5 or WRF
    • Application of TRANSIMS
    • Exposure assessments
summary urban database conceptual design provides
SUMMARY: Urban database conceptual design provides:
  • Platform for advancing state of urban modeling- accomodates new modeling systems, new (sets of) parameterizations
  • Community framework facilitates collaborations
  • Modeler’s focused system
  • Several tools including regrid and remap to different size & map projections
  • Prototypes provide strategic means for extensibility of its capability (copycat principle)
  • Is non stagnant (cities grow), can accommodate finer resolution data, data refresh cycle.
  • Facilitates handover from model development to application deployment
  • EU sponsored Megacity study and its databases can be incorporated and accommodated as a special prototype
the end thanks for your attention
The EndThanks for your attention

Disclaimer:The research presented here was performed under the Memorandum of Understanding between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Commerce's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and under agreement number DW13921548. This work constitutes a contribution to the NOAA Air Quality Program. Although it has been reviewed by EPA and NOAA and approved for publication, it does not necessarily reflect their policies or views.