1 / 28

Charm measurements at SPS to RHIC

Charm measurements at SPS to RHIC. Y. Akiba (KEK) March 14, 2003 Strangeness in Quark Matter 2003. Outline. Physics Physics with open charm pp, pA, AA Physics with charmonium pp, pA, AA Open charm measurements at fixed target Nuclear dependence: cross section, <pt>, A dependence

abril
Download Presentation

Charm measurements at SPS to RHIC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Charm measurements at SPS to RHIC Y. Akiba (KEK) March 14, 2003 Strangeness in Quark Matter 2003

  2. Outline • Physics • Physics with open charm • pp, pA, AA • Physics with charmonium • pp, pA, AA • Open charm measurements at fixed target • Nuclear dependence: cross section, <pt>, A dependence • Enhancement in Pb+Pb (?) (NA50 IMR) • Charmonium measurements at SPS and FNAL • A dependence: normal nuclear absorption, <Pt> • Anomalous suppression in Pb+Pb (NA50) • Open Charm measurements at RHIC • Charm measurement via single lepton • Run-1 (130 GeV) data (PHENIX) • Run-2 (200 GeV) prelimnary data (PHENIX) • Charmonium measurement at RHIC • First J/Y data at RHIC (PHENIX)

  3. Physics with open charm production • pp and hadron-hadron collisions • Comparison with pQCD calculation • Measurement of gluon density G(x) • Intrinstic <kt> • Base line for charm physics in pA and AA • pA • Gluon shadowing • Energy loss of gluons in cold nuclear matter • Parton multiple scattering and <kt> • Base line (normal nuclear effect) for charm physics in AA • AA • Gluon shadowing • Energy loss of charm in high density matter • Thermal production of charm in high temperature QGP

  4. Physics with Charmonium production • pp : study of production mechanism • Color evapolation model, Color singlet model, Color Octet model • Production cross section and its pt and s1/2 dependence • Polarization • Production of J/Y, Y(2S), cc, states • Base line for pA and AA • pA : study of “normal nucleus effect” • Nuclear dependence of s(J/Y) ….Aa or sabs (nuclear absorption) • Nuclear dependence of <Pt2> …multiple scattering effect? • Base line for AA • AA : study of “medium effect” in high density matter • J/Y suppression : signature of QGP (Matsui/Satz) • J/Y formation by c quark coalescence at RHIC/LHC ?

  5. Measurement of charm and lepton/lepton pairs Charmonium: lepton pairs • J/Y has a large branching ratio (6%) to lepton pairs, and it is almost exclusively measured by lepton pair decay. • Charmed mesons has a large leptonic branching ratio (D0: 7 %, D+:17%). Charm production can be measured indirectly by single lepton in 0.5< pt<3 GeV/c (RHIC/PHENIX) and lepton pairs in 1<M<3 GeV (SPS/NA50). • More direct measurement of D-meson reconstruction is difficult without a precision vertex detector J/Y  e+e-, m+m- Y(2S)  e+e-, m+m- cc  J/Y + g Open charm: single lepton and lepton pairs Charm signal: single lepton lepton pairs

  6. Open charm at fixed target (cross section) • Charm cross section by fixed target experiments are reasonably reproduced by LO pQCD event generator (PYTHIA) with large K-factor, or by NLO pQCD calculation (HVQMNR). Note that pQCD may or may not be applicable to charm production because charm mass is small (~1.5GeV) • In the left figure, world pi+N data and p+N data are compared with PYTHIA calculation. The s1/2 dependence of the calculation mainly reflects the underlying PDF. scc in pN,pN s1/2(GeV)

  7. Open charm at fixed target (<Pt>) E791 ds/dpT2 • FNAL E791 and CERN WA92 measured hight statistics Pt distribution of D-mesons in p+N collision. (No high statistics data in p+A is available) • In the left figure, E791 data and WA92 data are compared with PYTHIA calculation with different <kt> values. <kt> ~ 1.5 GeV/c seems to be required to reproduces the data. • Comparison with NLO pQCD calculation also suggests that observed pt distribution is harder than predicted, and large (>1GeV/c) intrinsic <kt> is needed to reproduce the data. • No published data on nuclear dependence in <pt2> but it can be similar to that of J/Y pT2 (GeV2/c4) WA92 ds/dpT2 pT2 (GeV2/c4)

  8. Nuclear dependence of Open charm cross section • Open charm cross section has little or no nuclear dependence a = 1.00± 0.05 (E769 250GeV p+A) a = 0.92 ±0.06 (WA82 340GeV p+A) a = 1.02 ±0.03 ±0.02 (E789 800GeV p+A) • This is consistent with that there is little nuclear shadowing at the x region probed by the fixed target charm experiments. • Significant nuclear suppression is reported by large xf region (WA78, a=0.81 ± 0.05). This can be due to nuclear shadowing in small x, but this is not well understood. • At RHIC, we can prove x region much smaller than in fixed target. We may observe nuclear shadowing effect in charm production. E769 250 GeV ± PRL 70,722 (1993) a = 1.00 ± 0.05

  9. Open Charm enhancement (?) at SPS Pb+Pb NA50 • NA50 measured di-muon distribution in 1.5<M<2.5 GeV. • The mass distribution is well reproduced by DD pairs + Drell-Yan components in p+A (@450GeV) with charm cross section scc/A = 36.2±9.1mb, consistent with charm cross sections of other experiments • In Pb+Pb, an excess of dimuon signal is observed. The excess can be explained by enhancement of charm production by factor of ~3 in central Pb+Pb. • The other explanation is possible: e.g. thermal dimuon pair produciton. NA50

  10. J/Y at fixed target and ISR • Many experimental data in the last 30 years near threshold to s1/2 = 63 GeV • Rapid increase of production cross section to s1/2 ~ 20 GeV followed by a gradual increase in higher energy. • The s1/2 dependence is similar to that of charm production cross section, suggesting that J/Y and charm ratio is almost constant with energy • Detailed, high statistics study of A dependence by E772/789/866 at 38 GeV and p+A and A+A measurement by NA38/50

  11. JPSI at fixed target: A dependence • Significant nuclear dependence of cross section is observed • Power law parameterization s = Aa a = 0.92 (E772. PRL66(1991) 133) (limited pt acceptance bias?) a = 0.919 ± 0.015 (NA38. PLB444(1998)516) a = 0.954 ± 0.003 (E866 @ xF=0. PRL84(2000),3258 ) a = 0.934 ± 0.014 (NA50, QM2001) • Absorption model parameterization • = 6.2 mb (NA38/50/51) to 4.4 mb (NA50, QM2002) • Small difference in a between J/Y and Y(2S) (E866) a(J/Y) – a(Y(2S)) ~ 0.02-0.03 @ xF = 0

  12. JPSI at fixed target: <Pt2> <pt2> vs A <pt2> vs s1/2 <pt2> vs L • <pt2> of J/PSI increases with beam energy • <kt> increase with energy ? • Gluon radiation effect? ( pQCD ) • <pt2> of J/Y increases with L (path length in target nuclear matter) or A1/3 • Consistent with multiple scattering of incoming partion ( Cronin effect)

  13. J/Y suppression at SPS • NA50 observed anomalous suppression of J/Y in Pb+Pb collisions at 158 GeV • Deviation from the nuclear absorption model (with s~4 to 6 mb) is seen in ET > 40 GeV or e>2.5 GeV/fm3 • If the suppression is due to J/Y break-up in high energy density matter, this is a strong evidence for QGP formation • If J/Y suppression is due to QGP formation, almost all of initially produced J/Y should be suppressed at RHIC energy NA50 NA50

  14. Charm and single electron at RHIC Simulation before RHIC PHENIX data (PRL88) • At RHIC, it is expected that charm decay can be the dominant component of single electron in pt > 1.5 GeV/c • Large production cross section of charm ( 300-600 ub) • Production of the high pt pions is strongly suppressed relative to binary scaling • Production of charm quark roughly scale with binary collisions. • PHENIX observed “excess” in single electron yield over expectation from light meson decays and photon conversions  Observation of charm signal at RHIC

  15. PHENIX single electron data • PHENIX observed excess of single electron yield over the contribution from light meson decays and photon conversoins • Spectra of single electron signal is compared with the calculated charm contribution. • Charm contribution calculated as EdNe/dp3 = TAAEds/dp3 • TAA: nuclear overlap integral • Eds/dp3: electron spectrum from charm decay calculated using PYTHIA • The agreement is reasonably good. PHENIX PRL88 192303 Assuming that all single electron signal is from charm decay and the binary scaling, charm cross section at 130 GeV is obtained as

  16. Comparison with other experiments • PHENIX single electron cross section is compared with the ISR data single electron data • Charm cross section derived from the electron data is compared with fixed target charm data • Single electron cross sections and charm cross sections are compared with • Solid curves: PYTHIA • Shaded band: NLO QCD Assuming binary scaling, PHENIX data are consistent with s systematics o (within large uncertainties)!

  17. Single electron measurement by PHENIX in RUN2photon converter method Ne 1.7% 1.1% 0.8% With converter Conversion in converter W/O converter Conversion from pipe and MVD Dalitz : 0.8% X0 equivalent Non-photonic 0 0 • Single electron spectra : • data with the converter • data w/o the converter • If all electrons are from photonic source (p0 Dalitz, g conversion, etc), the ratio is constant. But the data shows that electron yield approach at high pT each other. • It is an evidence for non-photonic electrons (i.e. charm/bottom decay)

  18. RUN2 single electron result • The yield of non-photonic electron at 200 GeV is higher than 130 GeV • The increase is consistent with PYTHIA charm calculation (scc(130GeV)=330 mb  scc(200GeV)=650 mb) • Large systematic uncertainty due to material thickness without converter. The error will be reduced in the final result.

  19. Centrality Dependence PHENIX data is consistent with the PYTHIA charm spectrum scaled by number of binary collisions in all centrality bins!

  20. Observation from PHENIX single electron data NA50 - Eur. Phys. Jour. C14, 443 (2000). Binary Scaling PHENIX Preliminary Enhancement of Open Charm Yield N part • NA50 has inferred a factor of ~3 charm enhancement at SPS. PHENIX does not see such a large effect at RHIC. • PHENIX observes a factor of ~3-5 suppression in high pTp0 relative to binary scaling. PHENIX does not see such a large suppression in the single electrons. • Initial state high pt suppression excluded? ( CGC, strong shadowing) • smaller energy loss for heavy quark ? (dead cone effect)

  21. J/Y at RHIC • J/Y production in N+N • J/Y production mechanism • Spin dependence (gluon polarization DG(x)) • J/Y production in Au+Au • Suppression by QGP formation? • Enhancement by recombination of charm and anti-charm in QGP? • PHENIX can measure J/Yee in |y|<0.35 and J/PSImm in 1.2<|y|<2.4 • Wide kinematics coverage • Independent measurement in two channels • PHENIX can measure of both open charm and J/Y • VERY strong constraint on the models of J/Y production

  22. J/Yee and J/Y mm in pp @ 200 GeV e+e- |y|<0.35 m+m- 1.2 < y < 2.2 |y| <0.35 NJ/Y = 24 + 6 + 4 (sys) Bds/dy = 52 + 13 (stat) + 18 (sys) nb 1.2 < y < 1.7 NJ/Y = 26 + 6 + 2.6 (sys) B ds/dy = 49 + 22% + 29% (sys) nb 1.7 < y < 2.2 NJ/Y = 10 + 4 + 1.0(sys) B ds/dy = 23 + 37% + 29% (sys) nb

  23. pp  J/Y at RHIC (<Pt>) 1.2<y<2.2 • shape of pT distribution is consistent with a PYTHIA calculation • average pT • <pT>y=1.7 = 1.66 ± 0.18 (stat.) ± 0.09 (syst.) GeV/c • slightly larger than measured at lower energies • consistent with a PYTHIA extrapolation to RHIC energy

  24. PHENIX data agrees with the color evaporation model prediction at s=200 GeV ppJ/Y at RHIC e+e- µ+µ- Br (J/l+l-) (p+pJ/X) = 226  36 (stat.)  79 (sys.) nb  (p+pJ/X) = 3.8  0.6 (stat.)  1.3 (sys.) µb

  25. J/Y e+e- in Au+Au collisions at sNN = 200 GeV • e+e- invariant mass analysis • very limited statistics N=10.8  3.2 (stat)  3.8 (sys) • split minimum bias sample into 3 centrality classes

  26. Centrality dependence of J/Y yield <Nbc>=45 p+p <Nbc>=297 <Nbc>=791 • J/Y B-dN/dy per binary collision compared to different models for J/Y absorption patterns • J/Y scale with the number of binary collisions • J/Y follow normal nuclear absorption with given absorption cross sections • J/Y follows same absorption pattern as observed by NA50 (Phys. Lett. B521(2002)195) Attention: all curves are normalized to the p+p data point! present accuracy NO discrimination power between different scenarios Much more statistics is needed!

  27. PHENIX μ PHENIX e E866 (mid-rapidity) NA50 Coming soon --- J/Y measurement in d-Au at RHIC J.C.Peng Nuclear shadowing effects in J/Y production soon will be studied by PHENIX. Comparison of J/Y yield in central arm and two muon arm is useful to distinguish different shadowing models Observed signal online Crude calibration PHENIX has seen J/y signal in d-Au collisions and expects to get a few thousands J/y at the end of the run.

  28. Summary and outlook • SPS and fixed target • Open charm production • Charm production scale with A in p+A collision (no nuclear effect) • NA50 IMR data can be interpreted as a large enhancement of charm in Pb+Pb • J/Y production • Extensive data on normal nuclear effect in J/Y production in p+A by E866 and NA38/50 • Suppression of J/Y production in Pb+Pb beyond normal nuclear absorption is observed by NA50 • RHIC • Charm production measured by single electron is consistent with the binary scaling (with relatively large error). • Little gluon shadowing at RHIC? • Little energy loss effect in charm quark? • The first J/Y data in pp and AuAu at RHIC is obtained • Much more statistics is needed to measure J/Y suppression at RHIC

More Related