1 / 14

IBI Service Delivery

IBI Service Delivery. Laura and Bruce McIntosh 905-761-5226 bruce.mcintosh@rogers.com. Our Story. Cliff was diagnosed in February, 2003 at Markham-Stouffville Hospital

abeni
Download Presentation

IBI Service Delivery

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IBI Service Delivery Laura and Bruce McIntosh 905-761-5226 bruce.mcintosh@rogers.com

  2. Our Story • Cliff was diagnosed in February, 2003 at Markham-Stouffville Hospital • Falls “at the mild end of the severe range” on spectrum, is verbal (50% of autistic children are not) and also hyperlexic and suffers from petit mal seizures • Is on wait lists with the following: Kinark, Geneva Centre, York Behaviour Management and Thistletown • The only government-funded therapeutic service he has received is 36 hours of speech therapy—and he’s “off block” until September because there aren’t enough Speech Pathologists available • Despite our education and political skills, that’s all we’ve been able to get for him. It’s not enough.

  3. Our Story (cont’d) • Don’t qualify for ACSD • Turned down by Jennifer Ashleigh Foundation and other charities • Private IBI therapy (at home) will cost $30/hour x 20 hrs/wk (min) = $2400/month or $30,000/yr • That’s almost half of Laura’s annual salary • We know Cliff could be one the 47% of kids who go on to be “indistinguishable from [his] peers” in Grade one IF he gets IBI now (Lovaas, 1987)

  4. Goals and Objectives • Release existing funds sooner for IBI therapy • Eliminate waiting lists • Premier’s commitment is on the record • Avoid bad coverage in the media • Help more autistic children like Cliff

  5. The Big Picture • Increasing rate of diagnosis (1 in 200) • 18 new referrals per week (province-wide) • Lengthening waiting lists (potentially 4,100) • Court action for those 6 yrs. and older* • Human rights appeals for those 5 yrs. and under* • Ombudsman complaint (Martel, Sept. ’02) • Media attention *Part of a continent-wide trend—B.C., Nfld., several U.S. states

  6. Waiting lists waste money • Delay in receiving service necessitates a re-assessment at intake—$2,000-3,000 per child • If there are 2,000 kids on the wait list province-wide, that’s $6 million (and growing due to new referrals) • State of Pennsylvania research shows that receiving IBI will cut future use of health and social services by half—in their case that’s $1 million saved—per child (Jacobson, Mulick and Green, 1998) • 3 new referrals/week in York Region means about 18/week or 932/year province-wide

  7. The Kinark situation • Stated in April ’03 that they would cut spaces from 120 to 80 to prevent going over budget through “aging out”—i.e. attrition will not create vacancies without new money • 2003 budget was $6.3M, more than ’02 budget, but less than the amount they “accidentally” spent—only created 29 spaces with the $800,000 budget increase (23 in the Regional Program and 6 DFO) • An additional $600,000 allocated in September ’03 created 11 spaces, all DFO • Hired two “Wait List Coordinators” and a “Program Manager” so admin costs will grow

  8. Private sector therapy costs less than Kinark therapy • Kinark was over budget in 2002 (spent $7.4M on a budget of $5.5M) • Admin costs were “10%” or $740,000 • 80 DFO kids cost about $2.85M or $35,625 per child (hourly rate is capped at $26.58) • 40 regional kids cost about $3.81M or $95,250 per child • DFO families pay for $10-$15K of expenses that are covered under the regional program, even though guidelines say they are covered • Private providers can do the same job for 50% less than the government agency • Decision to allocate funding to Regional Program or Direct Funding Option is Kinark’s decision—they put their own program first

  9. Private sector capacity • Estimates given in early May, 2003, before Kinark cuts freed up any private spaces and before new money arrived • Belief that private capacity does not exist is simply not accurate

  10. How Did We Get Here? • The Harris government began funding IBI in 1999 • Funds are not being released due to inaccurate belief that additional service cannot be provided • Inter-regional disparities in cost and delivery of service • Regional Program Managers choose to allocate funds to Regional Program or cheaper Direct Funding Option • Allowing third-party service providers to allocate government funding has tilted the playing field and prevents parents from accessing available services

  11. Option One: Status Quo • Potentially heavy back-end cost if government is legally “cornered” • Increasing attention to the issue will highlight slow pace of government action • Current program fails to help a large number of Ontario families—income too high to qualify for Assistance for Children with Severe Disabilities (ACSD), but too low to afford private therapy out-of-pocket

  12. Option Two: Faster Roll-out • Take allocation decision away from Regional Program Managers because they have a vested self-interest • Helps more autistic children • Money is already committed • Allows the government to show commitment • Respects parents’ right to choose • Highlights partnership with private sector service providers • Avoids fallout from Human Rights appeals and the Ombudsman • Huge savings in the long run

  13. Let funding find the capacity • Private IBI providers must comply with MCSS guidelines and are reviewed every 90 days • Adequate funding will “weed out” unqualified providers by forcing guideline compliance, which is not required in the therapy “black market” • Government should cover same services in DFO as in Regional Program— provide fairness and parental choice (see Behaviour Institute letter) • Fear of over-committing funds is unjustified • Addressing the issue provides a good news announcement in every riding in Ontario • Incidentally, it will also give Cliff a chance

More Related