1 / 6

[prop-041] Proposal for IPv6 assignment size to critical infrastructure

[prop-041] Proposal for IPv6 assignment size to critical infrastructure. Policy SIG 7 Sep 2006 APNIC 22, Kaohsiung, Taiwan Save Vocea. Motivation. Amend text of existing IPv6 policy document Clarify policy for IPv6 portable assignments to critical infrastructure networks. Current problem.

abel-holloway
Download Presentation

[prop-041] Proposal for IPv6 assignment size to critical infrastructure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. [prop-041] Proposal for IPv6 assignment size to critical infrastructure Policy SIG 7 Sep 2006 APNIC 22, Kaohsiung, Taiwan Save Vocea

  2. Motivation • Amend text of existing IPv6 policy document • Clarify policy for IPv6 portable assignments to critical infrastructure networks

  3. Current problem • Policy statement: • “The minimum assignment made under these terms is /32” • Operators of critical infrastructure have requested multiple /32 for multiple POPs or servers providing secondary services • Deemed that additional /32 assignments to critical infrastructure operators not conservative

  4. Policy in other RIRs • AfriNIC - /48 minimum under discussion • ARIN - /48 minimum assignment per POP • LACNIC - /48 minimum, /32 maximum per operator • RIPE NCC - /32 maximum allocation

  5. Proposal • Modify the statement to: • The maximum assignment made under these terms is /32 per operator • Avoid ambiguity and ease evaluation • Implementation: • Immediately after endorsement by the Executive Council

  6. Thanks! save@apnic.net

More Related