1 / 22

Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment

Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment. Marcel Merk NIKHEF Representing the LHCb collaboration. 19 th International Workshop on Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Oct 6-11, Geneva, Wisconsin, USA. B Physics in 2007. Direct Measurement of angles:

abeal
Download Presentation

Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Marcel Merk NIKHEF Representing the LHCb collaboration 19 th International Workshop on Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Oct 6-11, Geneva, Wisconsin, USA

  2. B Physics in 2007 • Direct Measurement of angles: • s(sin(2b)) ≈ 0.03 from J/y Ks in B factories • Other angles not precisely known • Knowledge of the sides of unitary triangle: (Dominated by theoretical uncertainties) • s(|Vcb|) ≈ few % error • s(|Vub|) ≈ 5-10 % error • s(|Vtd|/|Vts|) ≈ 5-10% error (assuming Dms < 40 ps-1) • In case new physics is present in mixing, independent measurement of g can reveal it…

  3. ,K Bs K K Ds  B Physics @ LHC bb production: (forward) qb qb • Large bottom production cross section: 1012 bb/year at 2x1032 cm-2s-1 • Triggering is an issue • All b hadrons are produced: Bu (40%), Bd(40%), Bs(10%), Bc and b-baryons (10%) • Many tracks available for primary vertex • Many particles not associated to b hadrons • b hadrons are not coherent: mixing dilutes tagging B Decay eg.: Bs->Dsh • LHCb: Forward Spectrometer with: • Efficient trigger and selection of many • B decay final states • Good tracking and Particle ID performance • Excellent momentum and vertex resolution • Adequate flavour tagging

  4. Simulation and Reconstruction All trigger, reconstruction and selection studies are based on full Pythia+GEANT simulations including LHC “pile-up” events and full pattern recognition (tracking, RICH, etc…) No true MC info used anywhere ! T3 T2 T1 TT RICH1 VELO Sensitivity studies are based on fast simulations using efficiencies and resolutions and from the full simulation

  5. Evolution since Technical Proposal • Reduced • material • Improved • level-1 trigger

  6. Track finding strategy T track Upstream track VELO seeds Long track (forward) Long track (matched) VELO track T seeds Downstream track Long tracks  highest quality for physics (good IP & p resolution) Downstream tracks  needed for efficient KS finding (good p resolution) Upstream tracks  lower p, worse p resolution, but useful for RICH1 pattern recognition T tracks  useful for RICH2 pattern recognition VELO tracks  useful for primary vertex reconstruction (good IP resolution)

  7. On average: 26 long tracks 11 upstream tracks 4 downstream tracks 5 T tracks 26 VELO tracks T3 Resultof track finding T2 T1 Typical event display: Red = measurements (hits) Blue = all reconstructed tracks TT VELO 2050 hits assigned to a long track: 98.7% correctly assigned Efficiency vs p : Ghost rate vs pT : Ghost rate = 3% (for pT > 0.5 GeV) Eff = 94% (p > 10 GeV) Ghosts: Negligible effect on b decay reconstruction

  8. Experimental Resolution Momentum resolution Impact parameter resolution sIP= 14m + 35 m/pT dp/p = 0.35% – 0.55% 1/pT spectrum B tracks p spectrum B tracks

  9. Particle ID RICH 2 RICH 1 e (K->K) = 88% e (p->K) = 3% Example: B->hh decays:

  10. pile-up L0 Trigger 40 MHz Calorimeter Muon system Pile-up system Level-0: pT of m, e, h, g 1 MHz Vertex Locator Trigger Tracker Level 0 objects Level-1: Impact parameter Rough pT ~ 20% L1 B->pp Bs->DsK 40 kHz ln IP/IP ln IP/IP HLT: Final state reconstruction Full detector information Signal Min. Bias 200 Hz output ln pT ln pT

  11. p+ p- B0 Knowledge of flavour at birth is essential for the majority of CP measurements B0 D K- l b Bs0 s b sources for wrong tags: Bd-Bd mixing (opposite side) b → c →l (lepton tag) conversions… s K+ u u εtag [%] Wtag [%] εeff [%] Combining tags Bdp p 42 35 4 Bs K K 50 33 6 Flavour tag tagging strategy: • opposite side lepton tag ( b →l) • opposite side kaon tag ( b → c → s ) (RICH, hadron trigger) • same side kaon tag (for Bs) • opposite B vertex charge tagging effective efficiency: eff= tag(1-2wtag)2

  12. Efficiencies, event yields and Bbb/S ratios Nominal year = 1012 bb pairs produced (107 s at L=21032 cm2s1 with bb=500 b) Yields include factor 2 from CP-conjugated decays Branching ratios from PDG or SM predictions

  13. CP Sensitivity studies CP asymmetries due to interference of Tree, Mixing, Penguin, New Physics amplitudes: fnew + + + fmix ftree fpen Measurements of Angle g: Mixing phases: 1. Time dependent asymmetries in Bs->DsK decays. Interference between b->u and b->c tree diagrams due to Bs mixing • Sensitive to g + fs (Aleksan et al) 2. Time dependent asymmetries in B->pp and Bs->KK decays. Interference between b->u tree and b->d(s) penguin diagrams • Sensitive to g, fd, fs(Fleischer) 3. Time Integrated asymmetries in B-> DK* decays. Interference between b->u and b->c tree diagrams due to D-D mixing • Sensitive to g(Gronau-Wyler-Dunietz) • Time dependent asymmetry in Bd->J/y Ks decays • Sensitive to fd • Time dependent asymmetry in Bs->J/yf decays • Sensitive to fs

  14. Bs oscillation frequency: ms • Needed for the observation of CP asymmetries with Bs decays • Use BsDs • If ms= 20 ps1 • Can observe >5 oscillation signal ifwell beyond SM prediction Expected unmixed BsDs sample in one year of data taking. (ms) = 0.011 ps1 Full MC ms < 68 ps1 Proper-time resolution plays a crucial role

  15. Mixing Phases • Bs mixing phase using Bs->J/yf • Bd mixing phase using B->J/y Ks Angular analysis to separate CP even and CP odd Background-subtracted BJ/()KS CP asymmetry after one year Time resolution is important: st = 38 fs Proper time resolution (ps) If ms= 20 ps1: s(DGs/Gs) = 0.018 (sin(d)) = 0.022 NB: In the SM, s = 2 ~ 0.04 (sin(fs)) = 0.058

  16. After one year, if ms= 20 ps1, s/s = 0.1, 55 <  < 105 deg, 20 < T1/T2 < 20 deg: () = 1415 deg No theoretical uncertainty; insensitive to new physics in B mixing (after 5 years of data) 1. Angle  from BsDsK (2 Tree diagrams due to Bs mixing) Simultaneous fit of Bs->Dsp and Bs->DsK: • Determination of mistag fraction • Time dependence of background Time dependent asymmetries: Bs(Bs)->Ds-K+: →DT1/T2 + (g+fs) Bs(Bs)->Ds+K-: →DT1/T2 – (g+fs) ADs-K+ ADs+K-

  17. 2. Angle  from B and BsKK (b->u processes, with large b->d(s) penguin contributions) • Measure time-dependent CP asymmetries in B and BsKK decays: ACP(t)=Adir cos(m t) + Amix sin(m t) • Method proposed by R. Fleischer: • SM predictions: Adir (B0 ) = f1(d, , ) Amix(B0 ) = f2(d, , , d) Adir (BsKK ) = f3(d’, ’, ) Amix(BsKK ) = f4(d’, ’, , s) • Assuming U-spin flavour symmetry(interchange of d and s quarks): d = d’and = ’ • 4 measurements (CP asymmetries) and 3 unknown (, d and )  can solve for  d exp(i) = function of tree and penguin amplitudes in B0  d’ exp(i’) = function of tree and penguin amplitudes in Bs KK

  18. “fake” solution blue bands from BsKK (95%CL) red bands from B (95%CL) ellipses are 68% and 95% CL regions(for input = 65 deg) If ms= 20 ps1, s/s=0.1, d =0.3, = 160 deg, 55 <  < 105 deg: () = 46 deg U-spin symmetry assumed; sensitive to new physics in penguins d vs  2. Angle  from B and BsKK (cont.) • Extract mistags from BK and BsK • Use expected LHCb precision on d and s pdf for  pdf for d

  19. √2 A2 √2 A2 A3 2 A3  A1 = A1 55 <  < 105 deg 20 <  < 20 deg () = 78 deg No theoretical uncertainty; sensitive to new physics in D mixing 3. Angle  from B DK* and B DK* (Interference between 2 tree diagrams due to D0 mixing) • Application of Gronau-Wyler method to DK* (Dunietz): • Measure six rates (following three + CP-conjugates): • 1) B D(K)K*,2) B DCP(KK)K*, 3) B D (K)K* • No proper time measurement or tagging required • Rates = 3.4k, 0.6k, 0.5k respectively (CP-conj. included), with B/S = 0.3, 1.4, 1.8, for =65 degrees and =0

  20. Measurement of angle g: New Physics? 2. B->pp, Bs->KK 3. B->DK* 1. Bs->DsK g not affected by new physics in loop diagrams g affected by possible new physics in penguin g affected by possible new physics in D-D mixing • Extract the contribution of new physics to the oscillations and penguins • Determine the CKM parameters A,r,h independent of new physics

  21. Systematic Effects Possible sources of systematic uncertainty in CP measurement: • Asymmetry in b-b production rate • Charge dependent detector efficiencies… • can bias tagging efficiencies • can fake CP asymmetries • CP asymmetries in background process Experimental handles: • Use of control samples: • Calibrate b-b production rate • Determine tagging dilution from the data: e.g. Bs->Dsp for Bs->DsK, B->Kp for B->pp, B->J/yK* for B->J/yKs, etc • Reversible B field in alternate runs • Charge dependent efficiencies cancel in most B/B asymmetries • Study CP asymmetry of backgrounds in B mass “sidebands” • Perform simultaneous fits for specific background signals: e.g. Bs->Dsp inBs->DsK , Bs->Kp& Bs->KK, …

  22. Conclusions • LHC offers great potential for B physics from “day 1” LHC luminosity • LHCb experiment has been reoptimized: • Less material in tracking volume • Improved Level1 trigger • Realistic trigger simulation and full pattern recognition in place • Promising potential for studying new physics

More Related