Loading in 2 Seconds...
Loading in 2 Seconds...
Read more about SC asks firm to deposit Rs 900 mn for purchasing Unitech\'s land in Chennai on Business Standard. A bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justice A M Khanwilkar asked Omshakthy Agencies (Madras) Pvt Ltd to deposit the amount in the apex court registry
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
purchasing Unitech's land in Chennai
A bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justice A M Khanwilkar
asked Omshakthy Agencies (Madras) Pvt Ltd to deposit the amount in the apex
The Supreme Court today directed a company, which is negotiating with embattled
realtor Unitech Ltd to purchase land in Chennai valued at around Rs 4 billion, to
deposit Rs 0.9 billion by March 31 in the apex court registry.
A bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justice A M Khanwilkar asked
Omshakthy Agencies (Madras) Pvt Ltd to deposit the amount after Unitech informed
the court that there was an agreement for sale of pieces of land between the two firms.
However, the apex court did not comment on the fervent request of Unitech Ltd
Managing Director Sanjay Chandra, who is currently in jail, to grant him custody parole
for 10-15 days to enable him to negotiate with interested buyers and arrange money for
refunding the homebuyers and complete the ongoing housing projects.
A senior official of Omshakthy Agencies (Madras) Pvt Ltd appeared before the court as
per its January 29 direction when the bench initially asked him to deposit Rs 1.5 billion
by March 31.
However, the counsel representing the official told the bench that as per the agreement
of sale with Unitech financial results , the entire amount of Rs 4 billion was to be
paid by June 2019 and by March 31 this year, the company has to pay Rs 900 million.
"Let him (official of the company) deposit Rs 900 million on or before March 31, 2018,"
the bench then said.
Advocate Pawanshree Agrawal, assisting the court as an amicus curiae in the matter,
referred to an application filed by some investors saying that Unitech could sell three of
its housing projects and get money to pay Rs 20 billion to the Noida Authority and over
Rs 2 billion to the LIC. The company would then have a tranche of Rs 10 billion with it.
Senior advocate Ranjit Kumar, appearing for Chandra, said he would file a response to
the suggestion given in the application.
He also repeatedly requested the bench to grant custody parole to Chandra.
"I (Chandra) am in jail for seven months. There is an onerous task for me. I (Chandra)
am trying my best," Kumar said, adding, "The Supreme Court has asked me to give Rs
7.5 billion for bail. I want to come out (of jail). Give me custody parole. Every buyer does
not want to come to the jail to meet me".
When the amicus said that Unitech's Chairman Ramesh Chandra was there to look after
these things, Kumar said, "the amicus should be neutral. He should not be speaking for
the homebuyers only. This is not fair to me."