,
Agricultural-zoned lands do not necessarily require a permit for fencing, but Paradise Ranch sought and got the county license due to the SMA overlay. Condition 6 of the SMA permit expressly requires the lateral, coastal trail to be left open. The lateral, coastal access trail to Lepeuli is considered by many to be part of the Ala Loa, an ancient Hawaiian trail that goes around the whole coast of Kauai along near the sea. This really is a different trail compared to steep, county owned trail overgrown with brush and trees mentioned before. In 2010 the County of Kauai got another steep, indebtedness-laden trail in the immediate place it lets from Waioli Corporation, which excludes a significant number of beachgoers like the elderly due to its steepness. One of the conditions of the county SMA license was that the location of the fence was subject to acceptance by the state Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) and Na Ala Hele, Hawaii's state trail and access software. Such acceptance was never granted, as evidenced by a June 27, 2011 memo to present county Planning Director Michael Dahilig from state Department of Land and Natural Resources chairperson William Aila. In a Sept. 9, 2009 memo, Na Ala Hele said there may be a historical trail that once traversed the property, but the authorities did not make a claim for any trails through the property when the land was registered in the Land Court system in 1943. William Aila's June 27, 2011 memo discredited that 2009 memo, saying it didn't represent the position of the section with respect to claiming roads and trails in Property Courted property. Hence, the state CAN claim a historical trail in http://sumonori.blog.ru/?attempt=1#post221876083 , or any other Land Court property should it want to do this. Aila's memo was also signed by two Deputy Attorney Generals. Kauai resident Linda Sproat, represented by Native Hawaiian Legal Corporation and supported by https://ningheacawon1981.wordpress.com/2016/09/12/is-it-the-naked-beach-experience-ive-always-fantasized-about-not-always-when-you-hear-others-talk-about-their-nudist-encounters-or-when-you-read-trip-reports-and-see-pictures-of-naturist-vacation/ , Surfrider Foundation and Malama Moloaa, appealed Thielen's decision issuing the state CDUP. She requested a Contested Case hearing. On Jan. 10, the lawyer for Paradise Ranch sent a letter to the BLNR conveying that the ranch would concede its permit due to the long and costly legal fight. Three days after, the Board of Land and Natural Resources (BLNR) voided the permit, leaving the importance of a Contested Case moot. Nonetheless, Laymon said he'd still build a fence. On May 21, Paradise Ranch erected a fence effectively blocking the entry to the sidelong, coastal trail. Laymon claimed he assembled the fence outside the state Conservation District, meaning he no longer needed state approval. Nevertheless, some community members challenge this claim, saying the fence's place is truly within the conservation district, thereby still necessitating a state license. Irrespective of its place, Condition 6 of the SMA permit clearly says the lateral, coastal trail cannot be blocked off. Add to this two years' worth of alleged physical bullying and harassment on Bruce Laymon's part, and his motivations become crystal clear. On the night the fence was erected, May 21, 2011, Jesse Reynolds, a 28-year-old farm worker, alleged he had been thown off a cliff above Larsen's Plage by Bruce Laymon. He later filed a police report seemingly naming Bruce Laymon as the guy who beat him up and tried to throw him off the cliff. Laymon denied all allegations with a credible alibi, and the Kauai Police later detained Reynolds for filing a false police report. Curiously, the county prosecutor did not proceed with prosecuting Reynolds. Meanwhile, beachgoers were inquiring Mr. Laymon why he was building the fence. Laymon purportedly replied, To keep the nudes, gays and hippy campers far from the plage. In a letter to the editor of The Garden Island newspaper Nov. 23, 2011, Waioli Attorney Don Wilson said, in reference to community activists Spacer, Hope Kallai, the Sierra Club, and other witnesses and victims of Laymon's actions, Their fictitious and misleading information regarding early trails, imperiled archaeological sites, alleged prohibited activities and physical violence against the community' have been costly to Waioli and are without value. Wilson punctuates his point by saying that Spacer, Kallai et al are folks of self-appointed status, and do not represent anyone in the community but themselves. A clear lie as Spacer had been unanimously appointed a Naturist Action Committee (NAC) Place Representative as early as Autumn 2010. Picture of the prohibited fence, erected on May 21, 2011, that breaks Condition 6 of Paradise Ranch's SMA license. Maybe Mr. Wilson is oblivious of the existence of The Naturist Society, or The Naturist Action Committee, but in either case, neither Bruce Laymon nor Waioli Corporation have ever attempted to sue Spacer or anyone named above in circuit court, despite the case being an easy win if one considers his statement at face value. And when trespassers entered Waioli land on October 23, 2011 to take photographs of the alleged stone quarry action why weren't any of them arrested?