Does Auto Dealer Fraud Differ from Lemon Law Cases

1. Does Auto Dealer Fraud Differ from Lemon Law Cases? Although there may occasionally be some overlap, a lemon law case is different from an auto dealer fraud action. Lemon laws are state statutes that provide consumers who have purchased a damaged vehicle—often referred to as a "lemon"—with legal protections. Under these clauses, customers may be eligible for a refund or a replacement vehicle if the manufacturer is unable to fix a defect in a fair amount of time. Typically, new cars are subject to lemon laws. Nonetheless, similar protections might also apply to secondhand cars in some regions. Contrarily, any illegal or dishonest practices used by auto dealers when they sell or lease cars to clients are referred to as auto dealer fraud. These tactics could involve using bait-and-switch tactics, adding unlawful charges to the sales contract, omitting important vehicle information, or falsifying a car's condition or history. While a lemon law lawsuit focuses on an issue with the vehicle itself, an auto dealer fraud case entails deceptive actions by the dealership or its employees. In other cases, however, a dealership can be found to have committed both car dealer fraud and the lemon law, such as purposefully selling a car with a fault without telling the buyer about it. Lemon law claims typically ask for a customer's refund or a replacement vehicle. On the other hand, fraud cases involving vehicle dealers aim to compensate the consumer for losses and damages brought on by the dealership's deceptive advertising. However, the specific legal processes and attainable

2. remedies will depend on the specific facts of each instance. If you are the victim of such an auto fraud, consult with Lemon Law Attorney to get the best solution or remedy.