density functional theory the basis of most modern calculations n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Density Functional Theory The Basis of Most Modern Calculations PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Density Functional Theory The Basis of Most Modern Calculations

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 29

Density Functional Theory The Basis of Most Modern Calculations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 295 Views
  • Uploaded on

Density Functional Theory The Basis of Most Modern Calculations. Richard M. Martin University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Lecture II Behind the functionals – limits and challenges.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Density Functional Theory The Basis of Most Modern Calculations' - Sophia


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
density functional theory the basis of most modern calculations
Density Functional Theory The Basis of Most Modern Calculations

Richard M. Martin

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Lecture IIBehind the functionals – limits and challenges

Lecture at Workshop on Bridging Time and Length Scales in Materials Science and BiophysicsIPAM, UCLA – September, 2005

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

density functional theory the basis of most modern calculations1
Density Functional Theory The Basis of Most Modern Calculations

Hohenberg-Kohn; Kohn-Sham – 1965

Defined a new approach to the many-body interacting electron problem

  • Yesterday
    • Brief statement of the Hohenberg-Kohn theorems and the Kohn-sham Ansatz
    • Overview of the solution of the Kohn-Sham equations and the importance of pseudopotentials in modern methods
  • Today
    • Deeper insights into the Hohenberg-Kohn theorems and the Kohn-sham Ansatz
    • The nature of the exchange-correlation functional
    • Understanding the limits of present functionals and the challenges for the future
    • Explicit many-body methods and improved DFT approaches

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

slide3

electrons in an external potential

Interacting

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

the basis of most modern calculations density functional theory dft
The basis of most modern calculationsDensity Functional Theory (DFT)
  • Hohenberg-Kohn (1964)
  • All properties of the many-body system are determined by the ground state density n0(r)
  • Each property is a functional of the ground state density n0(r) which is written as f [n0]
  • A functional f [n0] maps a function to a result: n0(r) →f

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

the hohenberg kohn theorems
The Hohenberg-Kohn Theorems

n0(r) →Vext(r) (except for constant)

→ All properties

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

the hohenberg kohn theorems1
The Hohenberg-Kohn Theorems

Minimizing E[n] for a given Vext(r) → n0(r) and E

In principle, one can find all other properties and they are functionals of n0(r).

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

the hohenberg kohn theorems proof
The Hohenberg-Kohn Theorems - Proof

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

the hohenberg kohn theorems continued
The Hohenberg-Kohn Theorems - Continued
  • What is accomplished by the Hohenberg-Kohn theorems?
  • Existence proofs that properties of the many-electron system are functionals of the density
  • A Nobel prize for this???
  • The genius are the following steps – to realize that this provides a new way to approach the many-body problem

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

the kohn sham ansatz from lecture i

Exchange-CorrelationFunctional – Exact theorybut unknown functional!

Equations for independentparticles - soluble

The Kohn-Sham Ansatz - from Lecture I
  • Kohn-Sham (1965) – Replace original many-body problem with an independent electron problem – that can be solved!
  • The ground state density is required to be the same as the exact density
  • The new paradigm – find useful,approximate functionals

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

meaning the functionals

The real meaning! Includes all effects of exchange and correlation!

Meaning the functionals?

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

functional e xc n in kohn sham eqs
Functional Exc[n] in Kohn-Sham Eqs.
  • How to find a [approximate] functional Exc[n]
  • Requires information on the many-body system of interacting electrons
  • Local Density Approximation - LDA
    • Assume the functional is the same as a model problem –the homogeneous electron gas
    • Exc has been calculated as a function of densityusing quantum Monte Carlo methods (Ceperley & Alder)
  • Gradient approximations - GGA
    • Various theoretical improvements for electron density that is varies in space

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

what is e xc n

Spherical averagearound electron

Exchange hole in Ne atom

Fig. 7.2 Gunnarsson, et. al. [348]

electron

nucleus

What is Exc[n]?
  • Exchange and correlation →around each electron, other electrons tend to be excluded – “x-c hole”
  • Excis the interaction of the electron with the “hole” – involves only a spherical average

Very non-spherical!

Spherical average very closeto the hole in a homogeneouselectron gas!

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

exchange correlation x c hole in silicon
Exchange-correlation (x-c) hole in silicon
  • Calculated by Monte Carlo methods

Exchange

Correlation

Hole is reasonably well localized near the electron

Supports a local approximation

Fig. 7.3 - Hood, et. al. [349]

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

exchange correlation x c hole in silicon1
Exchange-correlation (x-c) hole in silicon
  • Calculated by Monte Carlo methods

Exchange-correlation hole – spherical average

Bond Center

Comparison to scale

Interstitial position

x-c hole close to that in the homogeneous gas in the most relevant regions of space

Supports local density approximation !

Fig. 7.4 - Hood, et. al. [349]

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

the kohn sham equations

Eigenvalues are approximationto the energies to add or subtract electrons –electron bandsMore later

Constraint – requiredExclusion principle forindependent particles

The Kohn-Sham Equations
  • Assuming a form for Exc[n]
  • Minimizing energy (with constraints)  Kohn-Sham Eqs.

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

comparisons lapw paw pseudopotentials vasp code
Comparisons – LAPW – PAW - - Pseudopotentials (VASP code)

(Repeat from Lecture I)

  • a – lattice constant; B – bulk modulus; m – magnetization
  • aHolzwarth , et al.; bKresse & Joubert; cCho & Scheffler; dStizrude, et al.

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

what about eigenvalues
What about eigenvalues?
  • The only quantities that are supposed to be correct in the Kohn-Sham approach are the density, energy, forces, ….
  • These are integrated quantities
    • Density n(r ) = Si|Yi(r )|2
    • Energy Etot = Si ei + F[n]
    • Force FI = - dEtot / dRI where RI = position of nucleus I
  • What about the individual Yi(r ) and ei?
    • In a non-interacting system, ei are the energies to add and subtract “Kohn-Sham-ons” – non-interacting “electrons”
    • In the real interacting many-electron system, energies to add and subtract electrons are well-defined only at the Fermi energy
  • The Kohn-Sham Yi(r ) and ei are approximate functions- a starting point for meaningful many-body calculations

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

electron bands
Electron Bands
  • Understood since the 1920’s - independent electron theories predict that electrons form bands of allowed eigenvalues, withforbidden gaps
  • Established by experimentally for states near the Fermi energy

Silicon

Extra added electronsgo in bottom of conduction band

Empty Bands

Gap

Missing electrons(holes) go in top of valence band

Filled Bands

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

slide20

A metal in “LDA” calculations!

Improved many-body GW calculations

Rohlfing, Louie

Comparison of Theory and ExperimentAngle Resolved Photoemission (Inverse Photoemission)Reveals Electronic Removal (Addition) Spectra

Germanium

LDA DFT Calcs. (dashed lines)

Many-body Th. (lines) Experiment (points)

Silver

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

explicit many body methods
Explicit Many-body methods
  • Present approximate DFT calculations can be the starting point for explicit many-body calculations
    • “GW” - Green’s function for excitations
      • Use DFT wavefunctions as basis for many-body perturbation expansion
    • QMC – quantum Monte Carlo for improved treatment of correlations
      • Use DFT wavefunctions as trial functions
    • DMFT – dynamical mean field theory
      • Use DFT wavefunctions and estimates of parameters
  • Combine Kohn-Sham DFT and explicit many-body techniques
    • The many-body results can be viewed as functionals of the density or Kohn-Sham potential!
  • Extend Kohn-Sham ideas to require other properties be described
    • Recent extensions to superconductivity – E.K.U. Gross, et al.

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

explicit many body methods1
Explicit Many-Body Methods
  • Excitations
  • Electron removal (addition)
    • Experiment - Photoemission
    • Theory – Quasiparticles“GW” ApproximationGreen’s functions, . . .
  • Electron excitation
    • Experiment – Optical Properties
    • Theory – ExcitonsBethe-Salpeter equation (BSE)

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

explicit many body methods2
Explicit Many-Body Methods
  • Excitations
  • Electron removal (addition)
    • Experiment - Photoemission
    • Theory – Quasiparticles“GW” Approximation
    • Green’s functions, . . .
  • Electron excitation
    • Experiment – Optical Properties
    • Theory – ExcitonsBethe-Salpeter equation (BSE)

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

slide24

A metal in “LDA” calculations!

Improved many-body GW calculations

Rohlfing, Louie

Comparison of Theory and ExperimentAngle Resolved Photoemission (Inverse Photoemission)Reveals Electronic Removal (Addition) Spectra

Germanium

LDA DFT Calcs. (dashed lines)

Many-body Th. (lines) Experiment (points)

Silver

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

explicit many body methods3
Explicit Many-Body Methods
  • Excitations
  • Electron removal (addition)
    • Experiment - Photoemission
    • Theory – Quasiparticles“GW” Approximation
    • Green’s functions, . . .
  • Electron excitation
    • Experiment – Optical Properties
    • Theory – ExcitonsBethe-Salpeter equation (BSE)

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

optical spectrum of silicon
Optical Spectrum of Silicon

Many-body BSE calculation correctsthe gap and the strengths of the peaks- excitonic effect

Gap too small inthe LDA

Photon energy

From Lucia Reining

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

strongly correlated systems
Strongly Correlated Systems
  • All approximate functionals fail at some point!
  • “Simple density functionals, e.g., LDA, GGAs, etc. fail in many cases with strong interactions
  • Atoms with localized electronic states
    • Strong interactions
    • Transition metals -- Rare earths
    • Open Shells
    • Magnetism
    • Metal - insulator transitions, Hi-Tc materials
    • Catalytic centers
    • Transition metal centers in Biological molecules. . .

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

conclusions i
Conclusions I
  • Density functional theory is by far the most widely applied “ab intio” method used in for “real materials” in physics, chemistry, materials science
  • Approximate forms have proved to be very successful
  • BUT there are failures
  • No one knows a feasible approximation valid for all problems – especially for cases with strong electron-electron correlations

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005

conclusions ii
Conclusions II
  • Exciting arenas for theoretical predictions
    • Working together with Experiments
    • Realistic simulations under real conditions
    • Molecules and clusters in solvents, . . .
    • Catalysis in real situations
    • Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
    • Biological problems
  • Beware -- understand what you are doing!
    • Limitations of present DFT functionals
    • Use codes properly and carefully
  • Critical issues: to be able to describe relevant Time and Length Scales

R. Martin - Density Functional Theory - II - IPAM/UCLA - 9/2005