t h e a m e r i c a n u n i v e r s i t y o f r o m e hst 201 survey of western civilization i l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
T h e A m e r i c a n U n i v e r s i t y o f R o m e HST 201 - Survey of Western Civilization I PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
T h e A m e r i c a n U n i v e r s i t y o f R o m e HST 201 - Survey of Western Civilization I

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 15

T h e A m e r i c a n U n i v e r s i t y o f R o m e HST 201 - Survey of Western Civilization I - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 257 Views
  • Uploaded on

Session 15 Polities of the Middle Ages Some trajectories amidst a diverse political scenario Parallel worlds: rural and urban settings in the MA T h e A m e r i c a n U n i v e r s i t y o f R o m e HST 201 - Survey of Western Civilization I

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'T h e A m e r i c a n U n i v e r s i t y o f R o m e HST 201 - Survey of Western Civilization I' - RoyLauris


Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
t h e a m e r i c a n u n i v e r s i t y o f r o m e hst 201 survey of western civilization i

Session 15

Polities of the Middle Ages

Some trajectories amidst a diverse political scenario

Parallel worlds: rural and urban settings in the MA

T h e A m e r i c a n U n i v e r s i t y o f R o m eHST 201 - Survey of Western Civilization I

slide2

Biz E I Carolingian

expansion, coexistence &

multi-religious society

500

sunni/shia schism

Justinian

800

fundamentalism

CORDOBA

Cultural hub

Constantinople

falls

1000

fundamentalism

Ottoman Empire

1200

Trebizond

1400

1918

slide3

Carolingian evolution & Europe

On the cultural front

On the political front

The new countries

&

Diverse political

trajectories

Monasteries & monasticism

Cordoba

(Arist. before F)

Monasteries & knowledge

Universities

slide4

Carolingian evolution & Europe

On the political front

800

CH

Short lived but

not collapse

1000

Rhine &

Italy

F

R

A

N

C

E

1200

E

N

G

L

A

N

D

HRE

GERMANY

& Northern

Italy

Pope

+ Italian

princes &

republics

1400

slide5

3

2

1

Three political trajectories, new formations born from the last attempt of unifying Europe and from the decentralized system of property created in the feudalist system.

Hierarchical

MONARCH > VASSALS-FEUDAL LORDS > PEASANTS

Traders & cities?

slide8

Case 3: England and the parliamentarian monarchy

1215 Magna Carta… council of Lords & later, Parliament

TB citing Strayer: “The Magna Carta made arbitrary government difficult, but did not make centralized government impossible.”

While the Magna Carta surged after the vain attempts of John to conquer back the French lands (after his defeats), it allowed a concerted effort with Edward I to expand England's power in Wales, Scotland and France.

slide9

Politics & Economy

Parallel worlds?

Land property system in a land of Roman and barbarians

Mediterranean links

and commerce

Overall private property

Their mixture (their dialectic), origins of C

Countryside Cities

Agrarian Urban

Agriculture Trade

Feudalism Oligarchies & monarchies & plutocracies

Oath of Allegiance Charters

Technological advances in both

slide10

Feudalism> Decentralized political system(leading then to centralization as states evolve)> Power relations based on oath of allegiance (mutual defense) & tax contract > leads to confrontation monarchy vs. nobility(with their different aims and powers)> Property system based on small-scale tenure system. Ascendance of the Lord based on defense and protection.

slide11

> Fits the European system of war-driven societies> In the political process (and adding to war as a central factor), come the Crusades, that help the monarchs establish some sense of unity and power> In economic terms, the Crusades reopen trade routes to the East and allow further development of urban life> Feudal state: much institutional and political instability

slide12

> Society moved from a world of tribes and chiefdoms - in which rights of property were mainly defined through membership of a kin-group - to a society in which lordship over all land and men was increasingly assumed by state rulers.

> A situation typical in an “intermediate” period and normal among the barbarian tribes that were settling the old lands of the Roman empire, where “Roman” peoples where still cultivating and owing the lands.

> The so-called feudal state of the Middle Ages was an institution that represented a limited territorialization of power, wherein a king's ability to govern and rule his kingdom depended to a large extent on the cooperation of his vassals (p. 65, Elias 1982, 16-17).

slide13
Elias (1982, 16-17), the feudal state or kingdom was characterized by an inherent social and spatial tension. With only a rudimentary administrative structure available to govern their kingdom, the rulers of medieval states were dependent upon the personal relationships that existed between a king and his vassals in order to exert any jurisdiction over the vast majority of their territories. In effect, such control was largely derived from the social bond between two individuals rather than being based upon an objective and absolute ordering of space and territory. (p. 66)

There is no more striking a demonstration of this process than the dramatic collapse of the Frankish kingdom in the early Middle Ages, when the extended kingdom of Charlemagne disintegrated into a 'mosaic of autonomous duchies and principalities‘. (p.66)

slide14

FromCraft specialization, the reorganization of production relations and state formation. Thomas C. Patterson. 2005. Journal of Social Archaeology 5, 307.During the transition from feudalism to capitalism, feudal lords – who, in practice if not in theory, supported the ideal of a self-sufficient natural economy – were pitted against serfs, peasants and artisans, on the one hand, and merchant capitalists who sought increasing control of local and regional markets, on the other. Marx (1863–7/1977: 877–95) outlined the dialectics of class struggle in England during the transition. The serfs succeeded in breaking the bonds of servitude by the end of the fourteenth century, becoming a class of free peasant proprietors. The lesser feudal lords no longer able to appropriate goods and services from their former serfs dissolved by the end of the fifteenth century (continues…)

slide15

(…) and the group of former retainers, who never had direct access to the means of production and who lacked the ability to appropriate surplus from the direct producers, were recast as a proletariat. In the sixteenth century, the great feudal lords used coercion, laws and taxes to expropriate the resources they held in common and to force the peasants, formerly in possession of their means of subsistence and production, into growing dependence on the market and on production for exchange. This was accompanied by social differentiation in the rural communities, the simultaneous appearance of capitalist farmers who produced for the market and a rural proletariat whose members lacked the means of subsistence and were forced to hire themselves out as agricultural laborers.Relationship between Feudalism and the rise of national monarchies? (the relationship of feudalism and early capitalism)?