slide1 l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Philosophy and Arguments PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Philosophy and Arguments

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 33

Philosophy and Arguments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 341 Views
  • Uploaded on

Philosophy and Arguments. Outline. 1 – Arguments: valid vs sound . 2. Conditionals . 3. Common Forms of Bad Arguments. Outline. 1 – Arguments: valid vs sound . 2. Conditionals . 3. Common Forms of Bad Arguments.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Philosophy and Arguments' - Roberta


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide2
Outline

1 – Arguments: valid vs sound

2. Conditionals

3. Common Forms of Bad Arguments

slide3
Outline

1 – Arguments: valid vs sound

2. Conditionals

3. Common Forms of Bad Arguments

slide4

Argument: a sequence of sentences where one (the conclusion) is meant to follow from or be supported by the others (the premises).

Arguments

Premise 1

Premise 2

Conclusion

P1 All men are mortal.

P2 Socrates is a man.

C. Socrates is mortal.

Arguments can be:

Valid / Invalid

Sound / Unsound

slide5
Valid Arguments

Valid Arg.:

  • The conclusion logically follows from the premises
  • An argument where it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false.

P1 All men are mortal.

P2 Socrates is a man.

CC Socrates is mortal.

P1 All cats are reptile.

P2 Bug Bunny is a cat.

CC Bugs Bunny is a reptile.

VALIDITY = LOGICAL FORM

slide6
Valid Arguments

Attention!

  • Just because an argument is valid, it does not mean that its conclusion is true
  • Just because an argument is invalid, it does not mean that its conclusion is false.

P1 All cats are reptiles.

P2 Bugs Bunny is a cat.

CC Bugs Bunny is a reptile.

P1 If Bugs Bunny has big ears, then he is a reptile

P2 Bugs Bunny is a reptile .

CC Bugs Bunny has big ears.

But if the premises are true and the argument is valid, then the conclusion is always true

slide7
Valid Arguments : Exercise

I Your high idle is caused either by a problem with the transmission, or by too little oil, or both. You have too little oil in your car. Therefore, your transmission is fine.

II If the moon is made of green cheese, then cows jump over it. The moon is made of green cheese. Therefore, cows jump over the moon.

III Either Colonel Mustard or Miss Scarlet is the culprit. Miss Scarlet is not the culprit. Hence, Colonel Mustard is the culprit.

IV All engineers enjoy ballet. Therefore, some males enjoy ballet.

slide8
Sound Arguments

Sound Argument = VALID + TRUE PREMISSES

Sound arguments always have true conclusions.

slide9

An argument which is valid but not sound:

P1. If the moon is made of green cheese, then cows jump over it.

P2. The moon is made of green cheese.

CC Therefore, cows jump over the moon.

Valid vs Sound

Sound Arg:

P1 Prof. Le Bihan’s baby is a girl or a boy.

P2 Prof. Le Bihan’s baby is not a boy.

CC. Prof. Le Bihan’s baby is a girl.

slide10
Conclusion: Good and Bad Arguments

To Remember: distinction valid / sound arguments

Good arguments are SOUND, ie are valid and possess true premises – They support the conclusion

Bad arguments are either:

  • Invalid : the logical form is incorrect, or
  • Unsound: the premises are false

 These are the two ways in which you can criticize an argument from a philosopher !

slide11
Arguments: Exercise!

If Socrates is a man, then Socrates is mortal. Socrates is a man. So, Socrates is mortal.

If Socrates is a horse, then Socrates is mortal. Socrates is a horse. So, Socrates is mortal.

If Socrates is a horse, then Socrates has four legs. Socrates is a horse. So, Socrates has four legs.

If Socrates is a horse, then Socrates has four legs. Socrates doesn’t have four legs. So, Socrates is not a horse.

slide12
Arguments: Exercise!

If Socrates is a man, then he’s a mammal. Socrates is not a mammal. So Socrates is not a man.

If Socrates is a horse, then he’s warm-blooded. Socrates is warm- blooded. So Socrates is a horse.

If Socrates was a philosopher then he wasn’t a historian. Socrates wasn’t a historian. So, Socrates was a philosopher.

slide13
Outline

1 – Arguments: valid vs sound

2. Conditionals

3. Common Forms of Bad Arguments

slide14
Conditionals

Conditional : IF P THEN Q / P  Q

Necessary and Sufficient conditions:

IF P THEN Q

P Sufficient

Q Necessary

If you are pregnant then you put on weight

slide15
Conditionals: Exercise!

– to be over 16 / to be legally driving

– to be human / to be an animal

– to be alive / to be sick

– to be alive / not to be dead

– to be rectangular / to be square

– to be possible / to be real

– to do your homework / to get a good grade

slide16
Conditionals

Attention:

IF P THEN Q is NOT equivalent to IF Q then P

If you are pregnant, you put on weight

Is NOT equivalent to:

If you put on weight then you are pregnant

slide17
Contrapositions

Contraposition:

IF P THEN Q is equivalent to IF not Q then not P

If you are pregnant, you put on weight

IS equivalent to:

If you DON’T put on weight then you are NOT pregnant

slide18
Conclusion on Conditionals

To Remember:

  • What a conditional is
  • The distinction between necessary and sufficient conditions
  • The notion of contraposition
slide19
Conditionals: Exercise!

–You don’t drink? Oh, then you must be pregnant!

– You’re pregnant? Oh, poor girl, you’re stuck with carrot juice then!

– No pregnant women drink alcohol

– You are drinking tonight? I see, you are not pregnant yet.

– Wait, you are not pregnant, right? So, you are drinking tonight!

– If Justin is pregnant then he does not drink

slide20
Outline

1 – Arguments: valid vs sound

2. Conditionals

3. Common Forms of Bad Arguments

slide21

IF P THEN Q

If you are pregnant, then you gain weight

Using a conditional the wrong way

Two ways to use a conditional the wrong way:

Affirming the consequent/ Denying the antecedent

slide22

Circular arguments assume what they want to prove.

Circular Arguments

The police did not beat the suspect because beating suspects in not something that police ever do.

We know that God exists, because it says so in the Bible. And we can trust the Bible on this matter because it’s the Word of God, and so it must be correct.

Darwin's account of evolution is just a theory. A theory is an unproven hypothesis. So, there is no compelling reason to believe Darwin's theory.

slide23
Consequential Fallacy

Consequential fallacy: confuse the consequences of holding a belief with evidence for that belief.

Darwin’s theory is false because if it were true, there would be no morality.

slide24

Equivocation: to use an ambiguous term in different ways in an argument.

Equivocation

Nature is governed by fixed and unchangeable laws. But every law is the work of some legislator. Therefore, there is some legislator responsible for the governing of Nature.

slide25

Appeal to Consensus: one appeals to consensus to establish a claim.

Appeal to Consensus

Most people believe that McDonals is the best restaurant in the world. McDonalds is the best restaurant in the world.

slide26

Slippery slope: incorrectly reasons that the arbitrariness of marking a distinction along some continuum shows that no distinction is possible.

Slippery Slope

There is no agreed upon number of hair that qualifies someone as bald. Therefore, there is no difference between being bald or hairy.

There is no agreed upon age that qualifies a fetus as a person. To kill an innocent person is murder. Therefore, all abortions are murders, independently of the age of the fetus.

slide27

Misleading vividness: particularly vivid information is weighted more than other information in coming to a conclusion.

Misleading Vividness

Elections in France 2007

slide28

Genetic fallacy: taking the source of a claim as evidence for or against the claim.

Genetic Fallacy

Tom Cruise said that there is no such thing as a chemical imbalance of the body. Tom Cruise is crazy. Therefore, there is such thing as a chemical imbalance of the body.

slide29
Straw Man

Straw man: misrepesenting someone’s position, arguing against it, and supposing that the actual position is defeated.

slide30

Nigel: I believe that some kinds of sexual lifestyles are morally wrong.

Basil: So, you’re saying it’s OK for rednecks to beat up gay people?

Nigel: No, I’m not saying that at all. All people in our society should be protected from having unwanted violence inflicted upon them. I’m just saying I think their chosen lifestyles are immoral.

Straw Man

slide31
Straw Man

Basil: What makes you think it’s OK for you to force your morality on everyone else?

Nigel: I haven’t said anything about forcing my morality on anybody. All I did was give my opinion about a certain moral issue. I didn’t use any force or even the threat of force to coerce others to agree with me.

slide32
Straw Man

Basil: But you are saying that you don’t think gay people should have the same rights as straight people, right?

Nigel: No. I think all people in a democratic society should have the same rights. That means that people should have the right to pursue lifestyles that others think are immoral. I haven’t said anything about depriving people of their rights or inflicting violence upon them. I’m only giving my opinion about the morality of their behavior.

Bebee (2003) ``Good and Bad Arguments.’’

slide33

Feelings: a person argues for a position by indicating that they feel a certain way.

Feelings

Problem: No one cares how you feel.

More important problem: There is no warrant the think that your feelings about something are correlated to the truth or falsity of a proposition.

Solution: Use good arguments!