1 / 17

Mercury Storage Project

Mercury Storage Project. Desiree M. Narvaez Mercury and other metals programme United Nations Environment Programme. Mercury is an element…. …cannot be broken down, degraded, destroyed toxic and volatile poses unique environmental management challenges

Rita
Download Presentation

Mercury Storage Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mercury Storage Project Desiree M. Narvaez Mercury and other metals programme United Nations Environment Programme

  2. Mercury is an element… • …cannot be broken down, degraded, destroyed • toxic and volatile • poses unique environmental management challenges • require different approaches from those used of other toxic chemicals and waste

  3. Mandates for mercury work • 2001 – UNEP GC initiated global assessment of mercury • 2003 – UNEP GC decision 22/4 V • Decided that national, regional and global actions, both immediate and long-term should be initiated ASAP • Urged all countries to adopt goals and take actions with the objective of identifying exposed populations and ecosystems, and reducing anthropogenic mercury releases

  4. GC 23/9 : Strengthened the UNEP Mercury Programme • Reiterated the conclusions of the GMA report on the global adverse impacts of Hg on health and environment • Requested a report on the supply, trade and demand for mercury on the global market, and • Called for partnerships between Governments and other stakeholders as one approach to reducing risks to human health and the environment from the release of mercury and its compounds to the environment.

  5. GC Decision 24/3 • Recognised that current efforts to reduce risks from mercury are not sufficient to address the global challenges posed by mercury • The options of enhanced voluntary measures and new or existing legally binding instruments will be reviewed • Identified 7 priorities including • To find environmentally sound storage solutions of mercury

  6. GC Decision 25 • Requests the Executive Director to convene an intergovernmental negotiating committee with the mandate to prepare a global legally binding instrument on mercury, commencing its work in 2010 with the goal of completing it prior to the twenty seventh regular session of the Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum in 2013; OEWG second half of 2009 • Also requests the Executive Director… to continue and enhance, as part of the international action on mercury, the existing work, in the following areas: (a) Enhancing capacity for mercury storage

  7. Need for long term safe mercury storage • Decommissioned chlor alkali cells • Mercury by product from mining (e.g.non-ferrous metal mining such as zinc smelting) • End of life mercury containing products Objective: prevent reentry to the global market Repository and terminal storage facility -Isolate the mercury indefinitely -current initiatives in EU and US

  8. Closure of chlor alkali plantsshift to non membrane technology

  9. Mercury by product from mining • non-ferrous metal mining such as zinc smelting

  10. End of life products containingmercury

  11. Project components: • Estimation of projected mercury surplus • Options to establish a safe long term storage facility and criteria for selection of options:costs and benefits, social and political acceptability, technical and environmental factors, public health, infrastructure and regulatory requirements) • Creation of a regional advisory group: represented by an Executive Committee- catalyze action, recommend appropriate legislation/policies consistent with the establishment of a long term storage terminal facility

  12. Underground facility: geological formation

  13. Above ground storage facility

  14. Project components: • Development of feasibility study and analysis ofoptions: (within 10 months following the inception workshop)- include recommendations on the most suitable option • National and regional consultations • Call for specific proposals- detailed basis for site selection; detailed proposal on the design, costs/financing options, other requirements for the facility, site specific assessments, possible funding source

  15. Project Expected Output • Quantification/Estimation of surplus mercury • Options to be provided to governments • Creation of a Regional support structure/ Executive Committee-policy guidance • Feasibility study and analysis of options for a terminal storage facility • Recommendation on most feasible and preferred option • Call for specific proposals to include detailed basis for site selection, site specific assessments, design of facility, possible funding facility construction

  16. Project Institutional Arrangements • Regional advisory/executive committee-(Governments, civil society, industry) steering role: analyze options and provide policy recommendations to Governments • UNEP regional offices- will be kept informed of progress • UNEP Chemicals Mercury Programme- overall project coordinator (planning, oversee implementation, monitoring and evaluation)

  17. Further information on UNEP Mercury Programme http://www.chem.unep.ch/mercury/

More Related