Monitoring Drop Outs. Albania, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Mongolia, Slovakia, and Tajikistan Virginija Budiene Education Policy Center, Vilnius University, Lithuania 50th Anniversary Conference of the Comparative and International Education Society (CIES) Hawaii, March 14-18, 2006.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Albania, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Mongolia, Slovakia, and Tajikistan
Education Policy Center, Vilnius University, Lithuania50th Anniversary Conference of the Comparative and International Education Society (CIES)Hawaii, March 14-18, 2006
Monitoring Initiative of the Network of Education Policy Centers
Supported by Education Support Program of the Open Society Institute
The study indicated:
There were three main limitations to the survey:
Consequently, this cannot be considered a rigorous comparative survey.
However, it has value as an exploratory study and it provides insights into an under-explored phenomenon from a perspective closer to those who feel it most.
Why are they not where society intends them to be, for their own good as well as for the good of society?
answers that go beyond the simple responses of compulsory schooling laws, enforcement, and data collection on school attendance.
Different Faces in Different Countries
A child who has dropped out from school:
Based on the results of the survey, the following are the most common reasons why children drop out. They are broadly categorized into reasons that are considered as policy focus areas and understudied areas.