1 / 28

Evaluating Multi-Use / Multi-Tenant Commercial Recycling Programs

James Madden Preston Schultz HDR/BVA SAIC 415-434-0900 x 142 510-466-7130 james.madden@hdrinc.com william.p.schultz@saic.com. Evaluating Multi-Use / Multi-Tenant Commercial Recycling Programs. Presented By:. Sponsored By:. Eastmont Town Center Oakland, California.

MikeCarlo
Download Presentation

Evaluating Multi-Use / Multi-Tenant Commercial Recycling Programs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. James Madden Preston Schultz HDR/BVA SAIC 415-434-0900 x 142 510-466-7130 james.madden@hdrinc.comwilliam.p.schultz@saic.com Evaluating Multi-Use / Multi-Tenant Commercial Recycling Programs Presented By: Sponsored By:

  2. Eastmont Town CenterOakland, California Multi-Use / Multi-Tenant Commercial Recycling Program

  3. Eastmont Town CenterStopWaste.Org Program Baseline Waste Disposal: 2,856 cubic yards/year CO2 emissions: 28 tons/year Identified Waste Prevention and Recycling Potential: 2,276 cubic yards/year CO2 emissions: -319 tons/year 80% reduction / Cost Savings: $26,600 Annual Eastmont Stats 606,000 square foot mixed use project Former Mall re-branded as a Town Center Includes, police substation, library, medical center, retail stores, governmental offices, day care, senior center, charter school and more…….

  4. Plan Elements • Assurance of property managers buy in and their understanding of requirements • Coordinate with janitorial services, facilities management, and County Services • Determine size and amount of recycling bins required. • Convert 40 cubic yard unused compactor to centralized commingled recycling • Expand bottle and can and paper recycling program to all tenant suites • Track and measure results

  5. Design survey form for tenant recycling bin requirements Design Program Monitoring forms for janitors Create Program Announcement Letter, Program Roll-out Notice, Recycling Bin Tenant Agreement, and Recycling ‘How To’ sheet Work with local hauler to right size service and establish single stream recycling compactor service Phased roll-out Implementation of Plan

  6. Implementation of Plan • Conduct training for janitorial staff (bi-lingual) • Used opportunity to overhauled entire garbage system • Distribute and place recycling bins and conduct tenant training. Bins funded by StopWaste.Org • Organize roll-out event with media, city council member and county district representative • Coordinate with County General Services

  7. Finding consensus with multiple stakeholders: facilities manager, property managers, building owner, and janitorial services and local hauler. Timing!!! Stopping ‘scavenged’ cardboard ‘service’ Implementing retail strip recycling plan, (delayed due to holiday), converting them from tossing cardboard in alley way Challenges

  8. Challenges • Securing dumpsters and compactors and re-designation of unused compactor • Tenants who didn’t want to participate and training of those who did • Monitoring and contamination • Janitorial contract language • Tenant agreement addendums

  9. Challenges Resolved • Multiple meetings with all stakeholders • Flexibility!!! • Understanding stakeholders limitations • You’re the driver • Give them the rewards

  10. Program has continued to increase diversion as tenets have become used to program Reduced cost to facility is now $26,600.00 Since program began Nov 2006 have diverted ~72,000 lbs or 36 tons of materials from landfill Annual projection is 96,000lbs or ~48TPY Results

  11. Strengths Total support of Property Management and Facilities Saw program as opportune time to re-do entire garbage system in conjunction with implementation of recycling Weaknesses Lacking consistent program monitoring Little feed back to tenant on program progress Slow to come up with tenant recognition Strengths / Weaknesses

  12. What I Would Do Differently • Greater emphasis for property management to formalize program into standard operating procedures SOP’s • Urge property managers to issue addendums to tenant agreements for expectations of participation in recycling program

  13. Three Other Programs • Bay StreetEmeryville, California • Emeryville Public MarketEmeryville, California • 580 Market PlaceCastro Valley, California

  14. Bay Street High end, mixed-use retail “village” with broad range of retail, restaurants and entertainment

  15. Emeryville Public Market 25 restaurant “food court” anchored by bookstore and coffee cafes

  16. 580 Market Place Strip mall in suburban setting anchored by PW Market grocery store

  17. Overview Bay Street • Increased cardboard, paper and bottle & can capture • Implemented organics program Emeryville Public Market • Implemented organics program at 25-tenant facility 580 Market Place • Complex had no prior recycling • Implemented mixed recycling and organics program

  18. Implement Plan: Bay Street • Worked with site management • Improved existing programs • Two 30-cubic yard compactors installed for organics (StopWaste.Org provided funding) • Team provided rollout training and Emeryville provided bins to tenants

  19. Implement Plan: Public Market • Worked closely with property management, janitorial staff and hauler • Performed survey of tenants • Provided containers (from City) and training to all tenants • Performed multiple follow ups

  20. Implement Plan: 580 Market Place • Worked closely with management and hauler • Performed survey of tenants and purchased bins (StopWaste.Org provided funding) • Held pre-rollout event • Rolled out individually with each tenant • Numerous follow-ups

  21. Challenges: Bay Street • Coordinating multiple stakeholders • Ensuring tenants placed materials in proper bins • Ensuring organics streams were clean • Contamination issues with organics halted collection for a few months

  22. Challenges: Public Market • Program generally well received • Multiple follow-ups required • Need to build trust and cooperation between tenants and custodial staff

  23. Challenges: 580 Market Place • Getting service levels right • Ensuring tenant participation, particularly with organics • Ensuring organics streams were clean • Addressing tenant questions

  24. Results: Bay Street • Approx. 20 tons/month organics starting April 2006 • 15% increase in diversion • No associated additional cost • Increase in cardboard and bottles & cans

  25. Results: Public Market • Added approx. 12 tons organics/month • 53% increase in recycling • No associated additional cost • Custodial participation was key • Tenants monitor each other

  26. Results: 580 Market Place • Started collection of multiple streams mid-May (approx. 10 tons/month total) • 40% increase in recycling • $6,000/year in cost savings (plan to pass savings to tenants) • Multiple collection points required adjustment of service levels • Required numerous return visits to monitor service levels, contamination

  27. Management support Identify all stakeholders Expectations up front—be realistic Inform tenants (multiple times!) Low turnover is a plus Make educated guess on service levels Multiple follow-ups! Signage is key Anticipate challenges Seek funding sources Consider local hauling rates Lessons Learned

More Related