facilities and legal reform projects l.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Facilities and Legal Reform Projects PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Facilities and Legal Reform Projects

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 37

Facilities and Legal Reform Projects - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Facilities and Legal Reform Projects. Presentation for the Core Course on Legal and Judicial Reform for World Bank Staff January 11-14, 2005 . Gerald Thacker. Administrative Office, US Courts Assistant Director for Facilities, Security, and Administrative Services

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

Facilities and Legal Reform Projects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
facilities and legal reform projects

Facilities and Legal Reform Projects

Presentation for the

Core Course on Legal and Judicial Reform for World Bank Staff

January 11-14, 2005


gerald thacker
Gerald Thacker
  • Administrative Office, US Courts
    • Assistant Director for Facilities, Security, and Administrative Services
  • US General Services Administration
    • Commissioner, Public Buildings Service
    • Head, Public Buildings Service, Atlanta Region
gerald thacker cont
Gerald Thacker (cont.)
  • Consultant on Judicial support systems, primarily on court facilities program
    • Architectural firms
    • US Federal Courts Administrative Office
    • US State Courts
    • International Courts
      • World Bank
        • Venezuela, Guatemala, Philippines
      • USAID
        • Montenegro
the us federal courts model
The US Federal Courts Model

Not a good model for International courts

  • An adversarial system
  • Extensive use of juries
  • US not a unified system
  • Resource rich
  • Mature legal and internal governing system
  • Mature support system
  • Centrality of courthouses in US towns and cities
facilities in legal reform projects
Facilities in Legal Reform Projects
  • A necessary tool
  • Appropriate Facilities are Essential to the Administration of Justice
    • Impact of Facilities on Efficient, Effective Judicial Operations
    • Independent Judiciary
  • Judicial Involvement is Essential to Obtaining Appropriate Facilities
appropriate facilities contribute to judicial reform objectives
Appropriate Facilities Contribute to Judicial Reform Objectives
  • Protection of human rights
  • Foundation of Economic Development
  • Independence of the judiciary
  • Timely, consistent, legally-correct resolution of legal disputes
  • Reduction of case backlogs
  • Transparent, open, responsive and accountable functioning of the courts
  • Capacity of the judiciary to formulate and implement changes in court organization, practices and performance over the longer term
facilities in legal reform projects7
Facilities in Legal Reform Projects
  • Courtroom
    • Adequate space for jurors
    • Adequate space for public observers
    • Separation of litigants for privacy
  • Courthouse
    • Adequate space for consolidated clerks office
    • Adequate space for records
    • Adequate space for evidence storage
    • Separated circulation patterns
    • Appropriate environment for automation
integrated courthouse automation
Integrated Courthouse Automation
  • Current and Future Needs
  • Design Implications/Costs and Alternatives
  • Courthouse
  • Courtroom
automation in the courthouse
Automation in the Courthouse
  • Business Processes
  • Electronic Filing
  • Case Administration
  • Recordkeeping
  • Public Access
  • Security
  • Telecommunications
  • Building Operating/Fire & Life Safety
automation in the courtroom
Automation in the Courtroom
  • Presentation of Testimony
  • Presentation of Evidence
  • Taking the Record
  • Access to Ancillary Information
  • In-Court Case Administration
  • Public Access
  • Security
the smart courthouse



Equipment connections

Outside Access

Control Switching





Sound Reinforcement


Lines of Sight


The Smart Courthouse
facilities in legal reform projects12
Facilities in Legal Reform Projects
  • Demonstration projects
  • Master Plans for System-wide upgrades
  • Allocation of resources
  • Alternatives
facilities in legal reform projects13
Facilities in Legal Reform Projects

Inevitably controls the project’s critical path

  • Long lead time
  • Relative expense
facilities in legal reform projects14
Facilities in Legal Reform Projects
  • Construction is the last choice
  • Not the First
  • Up to 2000 M2 : 9 to 14 months
    • 2 to 3 months to develop scope of work and contract for design
    • 3 months to design
    • 2 months to contract for construction
    • 6 months to construct
  • 10,000 M2 and up: 3 to 5 years
    • 3 to 6 months to develop scope of work and contract for design
    • 6 months to design
    • 3 months to contract for construction
    • 24 to 36 months to construct
  • Multiple projects can’t always proceed concurrently
    • Limits of courts
    • Limits of design and construction community
    • Availability of construction materials
    • Weather
    • Topography
  • Successful techniques
    • Limit major new construction
    • Design Build
    • Pattern designs
    • Multiple construction awards
facilities in legal reform projects19
Facilities in Legal Reform Projects
  • Just a tool
    • IT
    • Training
    • Human Resources
    • Case Management
    • Court organization/administration
    • Budgeting and financial management
    • Facilities
  • Supports other project goals—not a project goal itself
  • Facilities component should be tied directly to other project goals
facilities in legal reform projects21
Facilities in Legal Reform Projects

Pre-Project Program Assessment

  • General condition of facilities to support reforms
  • Ability of court/government to implement facilities component
  • Current resource allocation
  • Support for on-going maintenance and operations
comprehensive facilities program
Comprehensive Facilities Program
  • Functional Assessment/Profile
  • Design Guide
  • Document Current Conditions
  • Long Range Facility Plans
  • Multi-year Capital Plan (prioritization)
  • Yearly Revisions to Long Range Facility Plans and Capital Plan
  • On-going maintenance and oversight
design guide purpose and use
Design GuidePurpose and Use
  • Describes the unique characteristics of courthouses in the Judicial system
  • For Judges, court staff, architects, engineers
  • Directly applicable for new construction
  • Useful for renovations
design guide elements
Types of spaces


Typical furniture/sizes

Appropriate office sizes

Appropriate adjacencies

Any requirement different from other government buildings



Wall/floor finishes/telecommunications



Handicapped access

Façade design/appearance

Built-in furniture


Heating/air conditioning

Design GuideElements
design guide spaces described
Courthouse exterior

Interior spaces

Main Entrance/Public Lobby


President Judge’s office

President Judge’s secretary’s office

Judge’s office

Intake offices




Interior spaces (cont.)

Court Archive

Typists’ office

Accountant office

Special spaces

Housekeeper's office

Coffee Bar

Conference Room

Server/computer wiring room

Telephone switching room

Holding cell

Evidence/seized property room

Design GuideSpaces Described
long range facility plans for each facility
Document Current conditions

Identify needed repairs

Determine future plans/needs

Create inventory of “projects”




New facilities

Estimate costs for each project

Long Range Facility Plans for Each Facility
develop a multi year 3 5 capital plan
Develop a Multi-Year (3-5) Capital Plan
  • Prioritize projects
  • Assign to budget years
    • Priorities
    • Costs
    • Available funding
  • Reorder/revise plan based on
    • Government action on previous budget year’s plan
    • New Information about facility needs
suggested criteria for prioritizing
Suggested Criteria for Prioritizing
  • Health and safety of employees
  • Overall building structural integrity
  • Security of employees and judicial process
  • Operating efficiencies and economies
  • Caseload impacted
facilities in legal reform projects30
Facilities in Legal Reform Projects
  • Architecturally attractive
  • Prominent siting
  • Appropriate indigenous materials
  • Durable construction materials
  • Interior functionality and flexibility
  • Local participation in design
some useful websites
Some Useful Websites
  • Americans with Disabilities Act www.ada.gov
  • Serviceability/functionality
    • International Centre for Facilities www.icf-cebe.com
  • Standards, reference documents, etc.
    • Whole Building Design Guide www.wbdg.org
thank you

Thank you.