1 / 25

Modernization Theory in Comparative Politics

very good

MAHDI37
Download Presentation

Modernization Theory in Comparative Politics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. POL831 MOD2 Johari,J.C.(1982)ComparativePolitics.NewDelhi:Sterling Publishers. Palekar,S.A.(2009)ComparativePoliticsandGovernment.New Delhi:PHILearning. Ray,S.N.(2000)ModernComparativePolitics.NewDelhi:PHI Learning. 81

  2. POL 831 MODULE2 2.6PossibleAnswersto Self-AssessmentExercises (SAEs) AnswerstoSAEs1 1. 2. True DavidEaston,regardsthepoliticalsystemengagedindecision- makingandimplementingtheauthoritativeallocationofvalues forsociety AnswerstoSAEs2 1. 2. True Government AnswerstoSAEs3 1. Thesystemtheoryhasmadesomerealcontributionsto comparativepolitics.First,thetheoryprovidesaverygeneral perspectiveonpoliticallife,whichcouldbeappliedalmost anywhere.Second,thesystemstheorypointedoutthat government,likeallsystems,wasdependentuponits environment,sothattheimportanceofthesocialandeconomic underpinningsofgovernmentwasreinforced. 2. First,itisaverycomplicatedtheory.Second,thetheoryisquit abstract. 82

  3. POL831 MOD2 • UNIT3 TheModernizationTheoryinComparativePolitics • Unit Structure • Introduction • LearningOutcomes • TheEvolutionofModernizationTheoryinComparativePolitics • TheCorePropositionoftheModernizationTheory • TheStrengthandUsefulnessofModernizationTheory • LimitationoftheModernizationTheory • Summary • References/FurtherReadings/WebResources • PossibleAnswerstoSelf-AssessmentExercises(SAEs) • 3.1Introduction • Inthechangingworldsituationafterthepost1945era,thedevelopment ofmodernizationtheoryinordertomodernisetherestoftheworldin linewithAmericandevelopmentisinterestinglysignificantinthe historyofdevelopmentstudies.However,thewaymodernizationtheory suggestsfordevelopmentandmodernityprovedtobecontroversialsoon afteritsdevelopmentasatheory.Toexploretheseissues,thisunitwill firstattempttohighlightthemeaningofthetermmodernizationfrom differentperspectives,whichisthenfollowedbyadiscussionofthe contextinwhichthetheorydeveloped.Thenitwillfocusonsomebasic objectionsembeddedinthetheorythatoffercritiquesfrommany developmentstudiesscholars. • 3.2 LearningOutcomes • Bytheendofthisunityouwillbeable to: • Tracethehistoricalevolutionofthemodernizationtheory • Examinethecorepropositionofthemodernizationtheory • Discussstrengthandusefulnessofthemodernizationtheory • Highlighttheweaknessesofthe modernizationtheory 83

  4. POL 831 MODULE2 3.3 TheEvolutionofModernizationTheoryin ComparativePolitics ForAlvinSo,therearethreemainhistoricalelementswhichwere favorabletotheevolutionofthemodernizationtheoryofdevelopment aftertheSecondWorldWar.First,therewastheriseoftheUnited Statesasasuperpower.WhileotherWesternnations,suchasGreat Britain,France,andGermany,wereweakenedbyWorldWarII,the UnitedStatesemergedfromthewarstrengthened,andbecameaworld leaderwiththeimplementationoftheMarshallPlantoreconstructwar- tornWesternEurope. Second,therewasthespreadofaunitedworldcommunistmovement. TheFormerSovietUnionextendeditsinfluencenotonlytoEastern Europe,butalsotoChinaandKorea.Third,therewasthedisintegration ofEuropeancolonialempiresinAsia,AfricaandLatinAmerica,giving birthtomanynewnation-statesintheThirdWorld.Thesenascent nation-stateswereinsearchofamodelofdevelopmenttopromotetheir economyandtoenhancetheirpoliticalindependence. Therefore,modernizationtheoryisadescriptionandexplanationofthe processesoftransformationfromtraditionalor underdevelopedsocieties tomodernsocieties.Inthewordsofoneofthemajorproponents, “Historically,modernizationistheprocessofchangetowardsthose typesofsocial,economic,andpoliticalsystemsthathavedeveloped inWesternEuropeandNorthAmericafromtheseventeenthcenturyto thenineteenthandhavethenspreadtootherEuropeancountriesandin thenineteenthandtwentiethcenturiesto theSouthAmerican,Asian, andAfricancontinents”(Eisenstadt1966:1).Modernizationtheoryhas beenoneofthemajorperspectivesinthesociologyofcomparative nationaldevelopmentandunderdevelopmentsincethe1950s.Primary attentionhasfocusedonwaysinwhichpastandpresentpre-modern societiesbecomemodern(thatisWesternized)throughprocessesof economicgrowthandchangeinsocial,political,andculturalstructures. Ingeneral, modernizationtheoristsareconcernedwith economicgrowth withinsocietiesasindicated,forexample,bymeasuresofgrossnationalproduct.Mechanizationorindustrializationareingredientsinthe processofeconomicgrowth.Modernizationtheoristsstudythesocial, political,andculturalconsequencesofeconomicgrowthandthe conditionsthatareimportantforindustrializationandeconomicgrowth tooccur.Indeed,adegreeofcircularityoftencharacterizesdiscussions ofsocialandeconomicchangeinvolvedinmodernizationprocesses becauseofthenotion,embeddedinmostmodernizationtheories,ofthe functionalcompatibilityofcomponentparts. 84

  5. POL831 MOD2 Itshouldbenotedattheatthispointthattheconceptofmodernization incomparativepoliticsdoes notrefersimplytobecomingcurrent or“up todate”butratherspecifiesparticularcontentsandprocessesofsocietal changesinthecourseofnationaldevelopment.Also,modernization theories ofdevelopmentdonot necessarilybear anyrelationshiptomore recentphilosophicalconceptsof“modernity”and“postmodernity.” Modernityinphilosophical and epistemological discussionsrefers tothe perspectivethatthereisonetruedescriptiveandexplanatorymodelthat reflectstheactualworld.Postmodernityisthestancethatnosingletrue descriptionandexplanationofrealityexistsbutratherthatknowledge, ideology,and science itselfare based onsubjective understandingsofan entirelyrelationalnature.Whiletheirphilosophicalunderpinningsplace mostmodernizationtheoriesofdevelopmentintothe“modern”rather thanthe“postmodern”context,theseseparateusesofthe termmodernityshouldnotbeconfused. Also,modernization,industrialization,anddevelopmentareoftenused interchangeablybutinfactrefertodistinguishablephenomena. Industrializationisanarrowertermthanmodernization,while developmentismoregeneral.Industrializationinvolvestheuseof inanimatesourcesofpowertomechanizeproduction,anditinvolves increasesin manufacturing, wagelabor,income levels,and occupational diversification.Itmayormaynotbepresentwherethereispolitical, social,orculturalmodernization,and,conversely,itmayexistinthe absenceofotheraspectsofmodernization.Development(like industrialization)implieseconomicgrowth,butnotnecessarilythrough transformationfromthepredominanceofprimaryproductionto manufacturing,andnotnecessarilyascharacterizedbymodernization theory.Forexample,whilemodernizationtheoristsmaydefine developmentmainlyintermsofeconomicoutputpercapita,other theoristsmaybemoreconcernedaboutdevelopmentofautonomous productivecapacity,equitabledistributionofwealth,ormeetingbasic humanneeds.Also,whilemodernizationtheoriesgenerallyenvision democraticandcapitalistinstitutionsorsecularizationofbeliefsystems ascomponentsofmodernsociety,otherdevelopmentperspectivesmay not.Indeed,dependencytheoristseventalkaboutthe“developmentof underdevelopment”(Frank1966). 3.3.1Definitionofthetermmodernizationandmodernization theory Thetermmodernization,hasbeendefinedfromvariousperspectives alongwithitsoriginalmeaning.Oneorientationtotheterm „modernization‟conceivesitasaprocessofsocialchange(Huntington 85

  6. POL 831 MODULE2 1968;Inkeles1969;Schwartz1972)whileanotherorientationconsiders modernizationnotonlyasachangebutalsoasaresponsetochange (Eisenstadt1966).AccordingtoHuntington(1968),modernizationisa multidimensionalprocessthatincludestransformationofhumanviews andactivities.However,Halpern(1966)whonotesmodernizationasa responsetochange,focussesonthecapacityofinstitutionstomanage thosechangeseffectively.Combiningthesetwoviewsintoone, Eisenstadt(1966)arguesmodernizationasaprocessofchangeandat thesametimehestressesonthecapacityofinstitutionstocontrolor adjusttochanges. Similarly,theAmericaneconomichistorianRostow(1960)presenteda model,consideredastheblueprintformodernizationapproach, signpostingdevelopmentasseriesofstagessuchasunderdevelopment, transitionandmodernity.Thisblueprintofmodernizationapproach impliesthat,inordertobemodernlikemodernAmerica,traditional countriesmustgothroughthesestagesofdevelopment.Modernization isimplicitlymeantinthemodelastheassociationsofproductionand standardoflivingcharacteristicofthewesterncountriessuchas America. Conversely,consideringtheChinesemodernizationthatincludesfamily bondage,tradition,rurallifeandculture,Li(2009)Arguesthatscholars havereachedconsensusthatmodernizationisafunctionalchangeof traditionalsocietalarrangement.Therefore,modernizationisaprocess ofchangingsocietiesfrompre-modern(traditional,pastoraland agricultural)tomodern(industrialized,secularandurban). Having understoodthemeaningofthe term„modernization‟, thecontext ofmodernizationtheorynowneedstobetakenintoaccount.Thetheory emergedwhendevelopmentbecameanurgentissueaftertheSecond WorldWarinacontextofinternationalchangingeconomicandpolitical realitiesasmentionedearlier.Thewholeworldwassharplydividedinto twoblocks-capitalistandsocialist,makingacoldwarsituation.New countrieswereemergingfromthedecolonizationofwesterncolonies. Developmentfortheseneweconomiesbecameanurgentissueof priority. Hence,Tipps(1973)hasarguedthatmodernizationtheorydevelopedas aresponseoftheAmericanpoliticalleadersandscholarstothepost secondworldwarperiodcontext.TheRostowmodelofeconomic development,ascitedabove,isasuitableexampleofwhatTipps(1973) calltheresponseoftheAmericanscholars.Thismodelmakesitclear thattheimplicitpurposeofmodernizationtheoryistoshapethe developmentoftheemergingcountriesfromthewesterncolonies, slidingthemtowardsthecapitalistblock.Thecontextinwhichthe 86

  7. POL831 MOD2 theorywasdevelopedisparticularlysuitabletothatculture,not necessarilysuitableforothers.Thiscontextualemergenceofthetheory gavebirthtodoubtsoftheobjectivityofmodernizationtheory.For example,thetheoryhasbeenaccusedofbeingethnocentric.This questionofethnocentrismbecomesapparentwhenaleadingproponent ofmodernizationtheory,Eisenstadt(1966),explicitlyexplains modernisationasaprocessofsocietalchangetowardswesternmodelof development.TheRostowmodelandParsonstheoryofvariablesalong withothermodernizationtheoristsperhapsinaccuratelysuggest westernizationformodernizationofthenon-westerncountries(Parsons 1964,Rostow1960). Self-AssessmentExercises1 Attempttheseexercisestomeasurewhatyouhavelearntsofar.This shouldnottakeyoumorethan5minutes: Howwillyoudescribethemodernizationtheory? WWRostowisoneofthemostcelebratedmodernization theorists…Trueor 3.3.2TheCoreAssumptionsoftheModernizationTheory Accordingtothemodernizationtheory,modernsocietiesaremore productive,childrenarebettereducated,andtheneedyreceivemore welfare.AccordingtoSmelser‟sanalysis,modernsocietieshavethe particularfeatureofsocialstructuraldifferentiation,thatistosayaclear definitionoffunctionsandpoliticalrolesfromnationalinstitutions. Smelserarguesthatalthoughstructuraldifferentiationhasincreasedthe functionalcapacityofmodernorganizations,ithasalsocreatedthe problemofintegration,andofcoordinatingtheactivitiesofthevarious newinstitutions(PrzeworskiandLimongi,1997) Tomakepoliticalsense,Colemanstressesthreemainfeaturesofmodern societies: a. b. Differentiationofpoliticalstructure; Secularizationofpoliticalculture–withtheethosofequality– which Enhancesthecapacityofasociety‟s politicalsystem. c. 87

  8. POL 831 MODULE2 Themajorassumptionsofthemodernizationtheoryofdevelopment basicallyare: Modernizationisaphasedprocess;forexampleRostowhas5 phasesaccordingtohistheoryofeconomicdevelopmentfora particularsociety,weshallcomebacktothislater. Modernizationisahomogenizingprocess,inthissense,wecan saythatmodernizationproducestendenciestowardconvergence amongsocieties,forexample,Levy(1967:207)maintainsthat: “astimegoeson,theyandwewillincreasinglyresembleone anotherbecausethepatternsofmodernizationaresuchthatthe morehighlymodernizedsocietiesbecome,themorethey resembleoneanother”. Modernizationisaeuropeanizationoramericanizationprocess; i. ii. iii. inthemodernizationliterature,thereisanattitudeof complacencytowardWesternEuropeandtheUnitedStates. Thesenationsareviewedashavingunmatchedeconomic prosperityanddemocraticstability(Tipps:1976:14). Inaddition,modernizationisanirreversibleprocess,oncestarted modernizationcannotbestopped.Inotherwords,oncethird worldcountriescomeintocontactwiththeWest,theywillnotbe iv. abletoresisttheimpetustowardmodernization.Modernizationis aprogressiveprocesswhichinthelongrunisnotonlyinevitable butdesirable.AccordingtoColeman,modernizedpolitical systemshaveahighercapacitytodealwiththefunctionof nationalidentity,legitimacypenetration,participation,and distributionthantraditionalpoliticalsystems. Finally,modernizationisalengthyprocess.Itisanevolutionarychange, notarevolutionaryone.Itwilltakegenerationsorevencenturies to complete,anditsprofoundimpactwillbefeltonlythroughtime.All theseassumptionsarederivedfromEuropeanandAmericanevolutionarytheory. Thereisalsoanothersetofclassicalassumptionsbasedmorestrictlyon thefunctionalism-structuralismtheorywhichemphasizesthe interdependenceofsocialinstitutions,theimportanceofstructural variablesattheculturallevel,andthebuiltinprocessofchangethrough homeostasisequilibrium.Theseareideasderivedespeciallyfrom Parsons‟sociologicaltheories.Theseassumptionsareasfollows: i. Modernization isasystematicprocess.Theattributeof modernity formsaconsistentwhole,thusappearinginaclusterratherthan inisolation. 88

  9. POL831 MOD2 ii. Modernizationisatransformativeprocess;inorderforasociety tomoveintomodernityitstraditionalstructuresandvaluesmust betotallyreplacedbyasetofmodern values. Modernizationisanimminentprocessduetoitssystematicand transformativenature,whichbuildschangeintothesocial system. iii. Oneoftheprincipalapplicationsofthemodernizationtheoryhasbeen theeconomicfieldrelatedtopublicpolicydecisions.Fromthis perspective,itisverywellknownthattheeconomictheoryof modernizationisbasedonthefivestagesofdevelopmentfromRostow‟s model.Insummary,thesefivestagesare: traditionalsociety, preconditionfortakeoff, thetakeoffprocess, thedrivetomaturity,and highmassconsumptionsociety. Accordingtothisexposition,Rostowhasfoundapossiblesolutionfor thepromotionofThirdWorldmodernization.Iftheproblemfacing ThirdWorldcountriesresidesintheirlackofproductiveinvestments, thenthesolutionliesintheprovisionofaidtothesecountriesinthe formofcapital,technology,andexpertise.TheMarshallPlanandthe AllianceforProgressinLatinAmerica,areexamplesofprogramswhich wereinfluencedbyRostow‟spoliticaltheories. Thesimilaritiesbetweenclassicalmodernizationstudiesandnew modernizationstudiescanbeobservedintheconstancyoftheresearch focusonThirdWorlddevelopment;theanalysisatanationallevel;the useofthreemainvariables:internalfactors,culturalvaluesandsocial institutions;thekeyconceptsoftraditionandmodernity;andthepolicy implicationsofmodernizationinthesensethatitisconsideredtobe generallybeneficialtosocietyasawhole. However,therearealsoimportantdistinctionsbetweentheclassical studiesandthenewstudiesofthemodernizationschool.Forexample, in theclassicalapproach,traditionisanobstacletodevelopment;inthe newapproach,traditionisanadditivefactorofdevelopment.With regardtomethodology,theclassicalapproachappliesatheoretical constructionwithahigh-levelofabstraction;thenewapproachapplies concretecasestudiesgiveninanhistoricalcontext.Regardingthe directionofdevelopment,theclassicalperspectiveusesanunidirectional pathwhichtendstowardthe UnitedStatesandEuropean model,thenew perspectiveprefersamultidirectionalpathofdevelopment.Andfinally, concerningexternalfactorsandconflict,theclassicaldemonstratea 89

  10. POL 831 MODULE2 relativeneglectofexternalfactorsandconflict,incontrasttothegreater attentiontoexternalfactorsandconflictspracticedbythenewapproach. Self-AssessmentExercises2 Attempttheseexercisestomeasurewhatyouhavelearntsofar. Thisshouldnottakeyoumorethan5minutes: Accordingtothemodernizationtheorymodernizesocieties havestructuralsimilarity…TrueorFalse? ListthestagesofdevelopmentasidentifiedbyWW Rostow. 3.3TheStrengthandUsefulnessofModernizationTheory Thestrengthsofmodernizationtheorycanbedefinedinseveralaspects: Wecanidentifythebasisoftheresearchfocus.Despitethefact thatthemainstudiesofmodernizationwerecarriedoutbya psychologist, a social psychologist, a sociologist ofreligion and a politicalsociologist,otherauthorshaveextendedmodernization theoryintootherspheres.Forexample,Bellahexaminestherole oftheTokugawasreligiononpajaneseconomicdevelopmentin South-EastAsiawitheffectsonvillagesofCambodia,Laosand Burma;Lipsetaddressesthepossibleroleofeconomic developmentinthedemocratizationofThirdWorldcountries, andInkelesdiscussestheconsequencesofthemodernization processforindividualattitudesandbehavior. ii.Asecondusefulnessofthemodernizationperspectiveisthe analyticalframework.AuthorsassumethatThirdWorldcountries aretraditionalandthatWesterncountriesaremodern.Inorderto develop,thosepoornationsneedtoadoptWesternvalues. Thethirdusefulnessisthatitsmethodologyisbasedongeneral studies;forexampletheexpositionsregardingthevaluefactorsin theThirdWorld,andthedifferentiationbetweenunstable democracies,dictatorshipsandstabledictatorships. i. iii. 3.3.4LimitationoftheModernizationTheory Modernizationtheory,ontheotherhand,waspopularinthe1950s,but wasunderheavyattackattheendofthe60s.Criticismsofthetheory includethefollowing: 90

  11. POL831 MOD2 i. Developmentisnotnecessarilyunidirectional.Thisisan example oftheethnocentricityofRostow‟sperspective. ii. Themodernization perspective onlyshows one possiblemodel of development.Thefavoredexampleisthedevelopmentpatternin theUnitedStates.Nevertheless,incontrastwiththis circumstance,wecanseethattherehavebeendevelopment advancesinothernations,suchasTaiwanandSouthKorea;and wemustadmitthattheircurrentdevelopmentlevelshavebeen achievedbystrongauthoritarianregimes. Othercritiquesofthemodernizationtheoryregardstheneedto eliminatetraditionalvalues.ThirdWorldcountriesdonothave anhomogeneoussetoftraditionalvalues;theirvaluesystemsare highlyheterogeneous.Forexample,Redfield1965,distinguishes betweenthegreattraditionalvalues(valuesoftheelites),andthe littletradition(valuesofthemasses). iv.Anotheraspectforcriticismhereisthefactthattraditionaland modernvaluesarenotnecessarilyalwaysmutuallyexclusive: China,forexample,despiteadvancesineconomicdevelopment continuestooperateontraditionalvaluesandthisappearstobe thesamesituationinJapan.Moreover,itisnotpossibletosay thattraditionalvaluesarealwaysdichotomousfrommodern status,forexample,loyaltytotheEmperorcanbetransformedto loyaltytothefirm. iii. Self-AssessmentExercises3 Attempttheseexercisestomeasurewhatyouhavelearntsofar. Thisshouldnottakeyoumorethan5minutes: Oneofthemeritsofmodernizationtheoryisthatthe traditionalsocietiesshouldemulatethevaluesofthe developed societies…Trueor False? Developmentisnotnecessarilyunidirectional…..Trueor 3.4Summary Insummary,therecouldbeseveralversionsofmodernizationtheory, butitsmajorimplicitorexplicittenetsarethat:(1)societiesdevelop throughaseriesofevolutionarystages;(2)thesestagesarebasedon differentdegreesandpatternsofsocialdifferentiationandreintegration ofstructuralandculturalcomponentsthatarefunctionallycompatible forthemaintenanceofsociety;(3)contemporarydevelopingsocieties areatapremodernstageofevolutionandtheyeventuallywillachieve economicgrowthandwilltakeonthesocial,political,andeconomic 91

  12. POL 831 MODULE2 featuresofwesternEuropeanandNorthAmericansocietieswhichhave progressedtothehigheststageofsocialevolutionarydevelopment;(4) thismodernizationwillresultascomplexWesterntechnologyis importedandtraditionalstructuralandculturalfeaturesincompatible withsuchdevelopmentareovercome.Atitscore,modernizationtheory suggeststhatadvancedindustrialtechnologyproducesnotonly economicgrowthindevelopingsocietiesbutalsootherstructuraland culturalchanges.Thecommoncharacteristicsthatsocietiestendto developastheybecomemodernmaydifferfromoneversionof modernizationtheorytoanother,but,ingeneral,allassumethat institutionalstructuresandindividualactivitiesbecomemorehighly specialized,differentiated,andintegratedintosocial,political,and economicformscharacteristicofadvancedWesternsocieties.Wehave alsostatedthatthetheoryhasbeencriticizedonseveralgrounds.The theoryhasfailedtotakeintoconsiderationthecontextofthewestern societyinwhichitdevelopedandthatofthepre-moderncountries.This notionoflinearityofmodernizationtheoryiscompletelyunableto explainthenon-linearhumandevelopmentphenomenonoftheworld. Againthetheorycompletelyoverlookssomecrucialissuesof humanitarianaspectsmakingthetheoryproblematic.Forexample, whileissuessuchasequalincomedistribution,publichealthand environmentalconcernsareimportantconsiderationsfordevelopment (DrezeandSen1999,Sen1999),theyarecompletelymissinginthe theory.Inaddition,thedichotomizationofmodernityandtradition offersseriouscritiquesforthemodernizationtheory.Modernization theoristscharacteristicallyviewwesterncountriesasperfectlymodern whileunderminingnon-westernsocietiesastraditionalandunchanged bycontrast(Gilman2003). However,toalargeextent,themodernizationtheoryisstill validforthe economic,socialandpoliticaldevelopmentofthecountries,the approachhasappearedquestionabletomanyscholarsofthefield.This isnotonlybecausethetheoryisincapableoffunctioningasa frameworkofdevelopmentbutalsobecausesomeobjectionable assumptionsareembeddedinthetheory.Whiletheseobjectionsor limitationssuchasethnocentrism,dichotomizationofmodernityand tradition,failuretorecognisetheexternalaspectsofchangeand ambiguityareevident,thesuitabilityandapplicabilityofthetheoryare simplydisproved. 92

  13. POL831 MOD2 3.8References/FurtherReadings/WebResources Aboderin,I.(2004)Modernisationandageingtheoryrevisited:Current explanationsofrecentdevelopingworldandhistoricalWestern shiftsinmaterialfamilysupportforolderpeople.Agingand Society,24,pp.29-50. Arts, W., Hermkens,P.andVanWijck, P.(1999)Modernisation theory, incomeevaluation,andthetransitioninEasternEurope. InternationalJournalofComparativeSociology,40(1),pp.61- 78. Gilman,N.(2003)MandarinsoftheFuture:ModernizationTheoryin ColdWarmerica,Baltimore:TheJohnHopkinsUniversityPress. Inglehart,R.andWelzel,C.(2005)Modernization,CulturalChange, andDemocracy:TheHumanDevelopmentSequence,NewYork: CambridgeUniversityPress. Li,Y.(2009)Revivaloftraditionormodernization?Theperspectiveof subjectivityinthestudyofmodernizationtheoryandacritiqueof thefunctionalistapproach.ChineseStudiesinHistory,43(1),pp. 61-71. Malik,N.(2009)Themodernfaceoftraditionalagarianrule:Local governmentinPakistan.DevelopmentinPractice:Stimulating ThoughtforAction,19(8),pp.997-1008. Menou,M.J.(2008)ImperialICTismtheHighestStageofCapitalism? Keynoteaddress,INFO2008,La Habana. Sen,A.(1999)DevelopmentasFreedom,Oxford:OxfordUniversity Press. Yuan,P.(2009)ModernizationTheory:Fromhistorical misunderstandingtorealisticdevelopment-Areviewofanew thesisonmodernization.ChineseStudiesinHistory,43(1),pp. 37-45. 93

  14. POL 831 MODULE2 3.9PossibleAnswersto Self-AssessmentExercises (SAEs) AnswerstoSAEs1 Modernizationtheoryisadescriptionandexplanationofthe processesoftransformationfromtraditionalorunderdeveloped societiestomoderndevelopedsocieties. True. 1. 2. AnswerstoSAEs2 False Answer:traditionalsociety,preconditionfortakeoff,thetakeoff process,thedrivetomaturity,andhighmassconsumptionsociety 1. 2. AnswerstoSAEs3 1. 2. True True 94

  15. POL831 MOD2 Unit4 PoliticalEconomyApproachinComparative Politics • UnitStructure • Introduction • LearningOutcomes • TheevolutionofPoliticalEconomyApproachinComparative Politics • 4.3.2 TheCorePropositionofthePoliticalEconomyApproach • Theclassical approach • Marxianpoliticaleconomy • Neoclassicalpoliticaleconomy • KeynesianPoliticalEconomy • ComparativePoliticalEconomy • TheStrengthandUsefulnessofthePoliticalEconomy Approach • LimitationofthePoliticalEconomyApproach • Summary • References/FurtherReadings/WebSources • PossibleAnswerstoSelf-AssessmentExercises(SAEs) • 4.1Introduction • Politicaleconomyisaninterdisciplinarybranchofthesocialsciences thatfocusesontheinterrelationshipsamongindividuals,governments, andpublicpolicy.Forinstance,politicaleconomistsstudyhow economictheoriessuchascapitalism,socialism,andcommunismwork intherealworld.Atitsroot,anyeconomictheoryisamethodologythat isadoptedasameansofdirectingthedistributionofafiniteamountof resourcesinawaythatisbeneficialforthegreatestnumberof individuals.Inawidersense,politicaleconomywasoncethecommon termusedforthefieldwenowcalleconomics.AdamSmith,John Stuart Mill,andJean-JacquesRousseauallusedthetermtodescribetheir theories. Thebriefertermeconomywassubstitutedintheearly20th centurywiththedevelopmentofmorerigorousstatisticalmethodsfor analyzingeconomicfactors.Therefore,thetermpoliticaleconomyis stillwidelyusedtodescribeanygovernmentpolicythathasan economicimpact.Assuch,thefieldofpoliticaleconomyspecifically dealswiththestudyofhoweconomictheoriessuchascapitalismor communismplayoutintherealworld.Thosewhostudypolitical economyseektounderstandhowhistory,culture,andcustomsimpact aneconomicsystem,andglobalpoliticaleconomystudieshowpolitical forcesshapeglobaleconomicinteractions.Therefore,inthisunit,we • 95

  16. POL 831 MODULE2 • shallexaminethecoretheoriesofpoliticaleconomyandtheir application. • 4.2 LearningOutcomes • Bytheendofthisunityouwillbeableto: • Tracedthehistoricalevolutionofpoliticaleconomytheory • Discusssometypespoliticaleconomytheories • Appreciateitsstrength,applicationandweaknesses. • 4.3 TheEvolutionofPoliticalEconomyApproach in ComparativePolitics • Theconceptofpoliticaleconomyisusedsinceancienttimesof intellectual inquirybutcomparativelyyounginacademicdiscipline.The analysisofpoliticaleconomy,bothinpracticaltermsandasmoral philosophy,hasbeentracedtoGreekphilosopherssuchasPlatoand AristotleaswellastotheScholasticsandthosewhopromulgateda philosophybasedonnaturallaw.Acriticaldevelopmentinthe intellectualinquiryofpoliticaleconomywastheprominencein the16th tothe18thcenturyofthemercantilistschool,whichcalledforastrong roleforthestateineconomicregulation.ThewritingsoftheScottish economist,SirJamesSteuart,4thBaronetDenham,whoseinquiryinto thePrinciplesofPoliticalEconomy(1767)isconsideredthefirst systematicworkinEnglishoneconomics,andthepoliciesofJean- BaptisteColbert(1619-83),controllergeneraltoLouisXIVofFrance, typifymercantilismintheoryandinpractice,respectively. • Specifically,politicaleconomyappearedasaseparatefieldofstudyin themid-18thcentury,mostlyasareactiontomercantilism,whenthe ScottishphilosophersAdamSmithandDavidHumeandtheFrench economistFrancoisQuesnaybegantoapproachthisstudyinsystematic ratherthanfragmentaryterms.Theytookasecularapproach,rejecting toexplainthedistributionofwealthandpowerintermsofGod‟swill andinsteadappealingtopolitical,economic,technological,natural,and socialfactorsandthecomplexinteractionsbetweenthem.Indeed, Smith‟slandmarkwork,anInquiryintotheNatureandCausesofthe WealthofNations(1776),whichprovidedthefirstcomprehensive systemofpoliticaleconomyexpressesinitstitlethebroadscopeof earlypoliticaleconomicanalysis.Althoughthefielditselfwasnew, someoftheideasandapproachesitdrewuponwerecenturiesold.It wasinfluencedbytheindividualistorientationoftheEnglishpolitical • 96

  17. POL831 MOD2 philosophersThomasHobbesandJohnLocke,theRealpolitikofthe ItalianpoliticaltheoristNiccoloMachiavelliandtheinductivemethod ofscientificreasoninginventedbytheEnglishphilosopherFrancis Bacon. Theoreticalstudiesofpoliticaleconomistsinthe18thcentury highlightedtheroleofindividualsoverthatofthestateandgenerally attackedmercantilism.ThisisperhapsbestexemplifiedbySmith‟s famousconceptofthe“invisiblehand,”inwhichhearguedthatstate policiesoftenwerelesseffectiveinadvancingsocialwelfarethanwere theself-interestedactsofindividuals.Individualsintendtoadvance only theirownwelfare,Smithproclaimed,butinsodoing,they alsoadvance theinterestsofsocietyasiftheywereguidedbyaninvisiblehand. Argumentssuchasthesegavecredencetoindividual-centredanalysis andpoliciestocounterthestate-centredtheories.Duringthisperiod,the utilitarianismofJeremyBenthamJamesMillandMill‟ssonJohnStuart Millunitedtogethereconomicanalysisfortheexpansionofdemocracy. Smith‟sconceptofindividual-centredanalysisofpoliticaleconomydid notgounchallenged.TheGermanAmericaneconomistFriedrichList developedamore-systematicanalysisofmercantilismthatcontrasted hisnationalsystemofpoliticaleconomywithSmith‟s“cosmo-political” system,whichtreatedissuesasifnationalbordersandinterestsdidnot exist.Inthemid-19thcentury,communisthistorianandeconomistKarl Marxproposedaclass-basedanalysisofpoliticaleconomythat concludedinhishugetreatiseDasKapital,thefirstvolumeofwhich waspublishedin1867. Theuniversalstudyofpoliticaleconomythattypifiestheworksof Smith,List,Marx,andothersoftheirtimewasslowlydarkenedinthe late19thcenturybyagroupofmorenarrowlyfocusedand methodologicallyconventionaldisciplines,eachofwhichsoughtto throwlightonparticularelementsofsociety,inevitablyattheexpense ofabroaderviewofsocialinteractions.By1890,whenEnglish neoclassicaleconomistAlfredMarshallpublishedhistextbookonthe PrinciplesofEconomics,politicaleconomyasadistinctacademicfield hadbeenessentiallysubstitutedinuniversitiesbytheseparate disciplinesofeconomics,sociology,politicalscience,andinternational relations.Marshallclearlyseparatedhissubject,economicsoreconomic sciencefrompoliticaleconomy,implicitlyprivilegingtheformerover thelatter,anactthatrevealedthegeneralacademictrendtoward specialization alongmethodological lines. Inthesecondhalfofthe20thcentury,asthesocialsciencesbecame increasinglyabstract,formal,andspecializedinbothfocusand methodology,politicaleconomywasrevitalizedtoprovidea comprehensiveframeworktounderstandcomplexnationaland 97

  18. POL 831 MODULE2 • internationalproblemsandevents.Presently,thefieldofpolitical economyembracesseveralareasofstudy,includingthepoliticsof economicrelations,domesticpoliticalandeconomicissues,the comparativestudyofpoliticalandeconomicsystems,andinternational politicaleconomy.Theadventofinternationalpoliticaleconomy,first withininternationalrelationsandlaterasadistinctfieldofinquiry, markedthereturnofpoliticaleconomytoitsancestriesasaholistic studyofindividuals,states,markets,andcivilisation. • Self-AssessmentExercises1 • Attempttheseexercisestomeasurewhatyouhavelearntsofar.This • shouldnottakeyoumorethan5minutes: • AdamSmithistheauthorofthebookTheWealthofNations… • TrueorFalse? • AdamCokerisapoliticalEconomistofthe20thcentury…True orFalse? • TypesofPoliticalEconomyTheory • Politicaleconomyisabranchofsocialsciencethatstudiesthe relationshipthatformsbetweenanation‟spopulationandits governmentwhenpublicpolicyisenacted.Itis,therefore,theresultof theinteractionbetweenpoliticsandtheeconomywhichisconsidered thebasisofthesocialsciencediscipline. • Thereareseveralnotabletypesofpoliticaleconomytheories: • Theclassicalapproach • PoliticalEconomyintheClassicalTradition • Inthisunitweexploretheclassicalapproachtopoliticaleconomy.The classicaleconomistsoftheeighteenthandnineteenthcenturieswerethe firsttousetheterm“politicaleconomy.”Theperiodcoveredby classicalpoliticaleconomycannotbestatedexactly.Arestricted definitionwouldextendfromAdamSmith‟sWealthofNationsin1776 toJohn‟s.Mill‟sPrinciplesofPoliticalEconomyin1848.Amore encompassingperiodizationwouldstretchfromtheworkofthe Physiocratsinthemiddleoftheeighteenthcenturytothedeathin1883 ofKarlMarx,whommanysawasthelastimportantclassicalpolitical economist.Marxhimselfiscreditedwithcoiningtheterm“classical politicaleconomy”(Dasgupta,1985:12),datingitfromthetimeof WilliamPetty. • 98

  19. POL831 MOD2 Wewilldivideourconsiderationofclassicalpoliticaleconomy intotwo parts:theargumentformarketself-regulationandthetheoryofvalue anddistribution.Thefirstpartconcernsthenatureofthemarketsystem anditsrelationtothestate.Thesecondconcernsproductionanduseof theeconomicsurplus.Thesecondpartdrawsonmorerecent contributionswithintheclassicaltradition.Althoughusingelementsof theclassicalanalyticalframework,theserecenttheoriessuggestan approachtopoliticaleconomyinsomewaysatvariancewiththatofthe classicaleconomiststhemselves. Theclassicalapproach framesthecentralthemesofpoliticaleconomyin adistinctiveway.Mostfundamentally,theclassicaleconomistsplayeda majorroleinintroducingandelaboratingtwocoreideas:theseparability oftheeconomyandtheprimacyoftheeconomicsphere. Politicaleconomygaveconsiderableimpetustotheshiftoffocusaway frompoliticsinunderstandingtheforcesthataccountforthelarge historicalmovementsthatmoldthesocialworld.AdamSmithsawthe riseofcivilizedsocietyastheresultofprofit-seekingbehaviorrather thanofanyplanknowntoandinstitutedbyapoliticalprocessorpublic authority.Thetransitionfromthe“savagestateofman”tocivilized societywas,forSmith,thehistoricalworkofcapitalism.Yet,itwasthe unintendedconsequenceofamultitudeofactionstakenforpurely privatepurposes. Marxtookthisideamuchfurther.Hedescribedtheprocessbywhich epochalchangeswerebroughtaboutinmethodsofproduction,social relations,andwaysoflife,allastheunintendedconsequencesofthe pursuitofprivategain.Marx‟smaterialistconceptionofhistory expresseswithspecialforcethesubordinationofpoliticsandofthe decisionsofapublicauthoritytotheimmanentandinexorable forcesset looseandoperatingwithinsociety.Theemergenceofpoliticaleconomy helpedtomarkthedemotionofpoliticsandtheelevationofthe nonpoliticalpartofcivillife.Indeed,itcontributestotheredefinitionof civillifeawayfrompoliticsandinthemoderndirectionofprivate affairspursuedoutsideofthehousehold,intheworldofbusiness.The riseofpoliticaleconomymeanstheriseofcivilsocietyin contradistinctiontopolitics. Thedemotionofpoliticscouldhardlybebetterexpressedthanbythe invisiblehandmetaphorofAdamSmith.AlthoughSmith‟sviewisin somewaysextreme,itveryclearlyarticulatesanewrelationship betweenpoliticalandcivilsociety(orpolitics andeconomics).Thisnew relationshiparises,inpart,outofarethinkingofthepossibleand reasonablepurposeofthestate. 99

  20. POL 831 MODULE2 Intheclassicalapproachthetermpoliticaleconomyreferstoasystem ofprivatewantsatisfactionmadeupofindependentprivateagents. Duringtheperiodofclassicalpoliticaleconomy,severaldistinctbut relatedtermsareusedtorefertothissystemofwantsatisfaction:civil society,marketeconomy,bourgeoissociety,capitalism,andothers. Eachtermdescribesthewayinwhichsocietybecomespredominantly aneconomicratherthanpoliticalsystem.Asitgrowsinstrength,this systemtendstodisplacepoliticseventhoughitinitiallyappearsundera politicaldesignation.Itsetsupanorderingprincipleforsocietywhich, sinceitisnonpolitical,challengestheideaofsocietyasapolitical system. AdamSmith‟snowclassicformulationofthelinkbetweenprivate interestandpublicgoodinamarketeconomydependsheavilyonthe argumentthatmarkets,ifallowedto,willregulatethemselves.Smith developshisargumentaspartofacritiqueofthepolicyofplacing “RestraintsupontheImportationfrom ForeignCountriesofsuchGoods ascanbeProducedatHome.”Smithbeginsbynotingthatthe “monopolyofthehomemarket”resultingfromrestraintsonimports encouragescertaindomesticindustriesandincreasestheshareoflabor andcapitaldevotedtothoseindustries.Buthequestionswhetherthis servesthepublicgood.Servingthepublicgoodmeansincreasingthe “generalindustryofsociety”orchannelingthatindustryin“themost advantageousdirection.” Thetheoryofmarketself-regulationisarguablythecentralachievement oftheclassicalapproachtopoliticaleconomyandthekeyto understandinghowaclassicallyinfluencedeconomistmightunderstand theinterrelationoftheeconomicandthepolitical.Moderntheorists workingintheclassicaltraditionhavenot,however,alltakenthis viewpoint.Recentcontributionshavebuiltonadifferentelementofthe classicalanalysisofmarketeconomy,oneconcernedmorewiththe pricesystemasitrelatestothedeterminationofwagesandprofits,less withitsimplicationsformarketself-regulation.Wenowturntothis otherdimensionoftheclassicaltheory.Thisdimensionbeginswith considerationoftherelationbetweenthesocialdivisionoflaborand commodityexchange. Thedivisionoflaborhasaverycloseassociationwithexchange.Inthe absenceofamarketfortheproduct,itmakesverylittlesenseforan otherwiseisolatedindividualtospecializeinthewaydemandedbythe divisionoflabor.Atthesametime,participationinthedivisionoflabor requirestheindividualproducertoexchangeinordertoacquirethose elementsofsubsistenceheorshedoesnotproduce.AdamSmithplaces thistwo-sidedrelationshipbetweenthemarketandthedivisionoflabor 100

  21. POL831 MOD2 atthecenterofhisanalysis.Withthedivisionoflaboreveryman “becomesinsomemeasureamerchant”(1937:22).Ourparticipationin adivisionoflaborforcesustoexchange.Thetypeofmutual dependenceassociatedwithdivisionoflaborgivesrisetothesystemof exchange.Atthesametime“thedivisionoflaborislimitedbythe extentofthemarket”(1937:17).Themarketalsoplaysapartin stimulatingthedevelopmentofthedivisionoflabor.Thedivisionof laboroccupiesapositionintheclassicaltreatmentofexchange analogoustothatplayedbyutilitymaximizationinneoclassicaltheory. Itaccountsfortheparticipationoftheindividualinalargersocial reality.Finally,thistheoryadvocatesprofitasamotivefor advancement.Putsimply,theideabehindcapitalismisthatprivate individualsandotheractorsaredrivenbytheirowninterests–they controlproductionanddistribution,setprices,andcreatesupplyanddemand Self-AssessmentExercises2 Attempttheseexercisestomeasurewhatyouhavelearntsofar. Thisshouldnottakeyoumorethan5minutes: AdamSmith‟sWealthofNationswaswrittenin…….? John‟s.Mill‟sPrinciplesofPoliticalEconomywas publishedin ……? 4.3.3Marxianpoliticaleconomy WithMarxism,therearemanypossiblevantagepointsfromwhichone candiscusspoliticaleconomy.Marxistshaveseenthepoliticalinthe veryseparationof civilsocietyfromthepublicarena(limitingrightsand equalitytothelatter),theclassprocessbywhichsurplusvalueis “appropriated”undercapitalism,theroleofthestateinmanagingthe interestsandaffairsofcapital,political(thatis,state-backed) guarantees ofproperty rights,revolutionary activity toalterthepoliticalinstitutions ofcapitalism,andthebargainingbetweenlaborandcapitalforcontrol oftheeconomicsurplus.Althoughthesevantagepointsmaysupply politicalcontenttoMarxianeconomics,thesensesinwhichtheydoso arenotobvious.Eventheconceptofclass,certainlyamainstayof Marxiantheory,isnotobviouslypolitical. Classescanexisteveninasocietywhereindividualsaredisconnected, unawareofcommoninterests,andpoliticallyunorganized.Nevertheless, ownersofcapitalmayexistandhirethosewhoselltheirlaborpower. Further,productionofvalueandsurplusvaluecanoccur.Inthiskindof economy,politicswouldnotbeevidentinthedailyoperationofclass 101

  22. POL 831 MODULE2 processes(thoughthestatewouldhavetounderwriteprivateproperty rights).Therewouldbenostruggleforthesurplus,nopowerbargaining betweenlaborandcapital,andnostateinterventiontocontrol labor.The useoftheterm“politicaleconomy”inMarxiantheorydoesnotdirectly referustostudiesoftherelationbetweeneconomicsandpolitics. Instead,itconnotesawayofthinkingabouttheeconomyrootedinthe methodandtheoriesoftheclassicaleconomists,especially AdamSmith andDavidRicardo. Thismethodemphasizestheideathatamarketeconomyoperates accordingtolawsrootedintheongoingreproductionandexpansionofa systemofmaterialinterdependencebetweenpersons-asocialdivision oflaborasdiscussedabove.Thisprocessfollowslawsthattheclassical economiststhoughtwereindependentofthewillsanddesiresof persons.Tobesure,individualswithinamarketeconomyact independentlyandaccordingtotheirdesires.Thematrixofindividual wantsdirectlydetermineswhathappensinthemarket.Yetbehindthese privatewantsstandsanobjectivestructureofreproductionwhose requirementsdominatetheindividualintheformationofhisprivate interests.Thisdominationjustifiesthetheoryinfocusingonthe (presumably)objectiveprocessofreproductionratherthanonthe subjectiveprocessofrankingopportunitiesormakingchoices. TheconceptofclassiscentraltoMarxiantheory.However,politically organizedclassesdonotemergespontaneouslyundercapitalism.At first,individualswithintheeconomyseethemselvesnarrowlyas isolatedagentspursuinginterestsuniquelytheirown.Suchinterestsmay havenothingtodowiththeinterestsofothersandmayevenset individualsinoppositiononetoanother.Suchinterestsarenot, however,isolatedandindependent.Capitalisteconomyworksinsucha wayastosetupacommonalityofinterestwithincertainclassesof persons.Themoreindividualsbecomeaware of theircommon condition andpurpose,themoretheyseetheirnarrowmaterialinterestina broaderlight.Thisprocessmarksatransitionfromindividualtoclass interestandultimately,frommaterial-economictopoliticalinterest. Suchatransitionisimplicitintheseparateprivateinterestsofpersons, andprovidesuswiththefundamentallinkbetweeneconomicsand politics. TheMarxianinterpretationoftherelationshipbetweeneconomicsand politicscentersontheideaofeconomicinterestsandtheparttheyplay indefiningpoliticalagendas.However,thedistancecoveredbetween pureeconomicinterestandpoliticalactionisconsiderable.Before economicinterestscanplayaroleinpoliticsdirectly,individualsmust beawareoftheirsharedinterests,organizeonthebasisofthem,and 102

  23. POL831 MOD2 overcomecollectiveactionproblems.Wewill,therefore,beginwiththe wayMarxiststhinkaboutinterests. Marxistsadvancethefollowingclaimsaboutinterests: 1. Interestsarisewithinthestructureofproduction.Thewantsofthe individualdependuponhisplaceintheprocessofsocial reproduction.Theindividualhas“economic”or“material” interestsinsatisfyinghisprivatewants. Within(civil)society,the positionoftheindividualinthesocialdivisionoflabor determineshiswants,whichdeterminehisinterests. Private(orself)interestcanbestbeunderstoodifwefirst understandtheclasstowhichtheindividualbelongs.Thatis,the 2. divisionswithincivilsocietyprimarilyresponsiblefor determiningwantsdivideindividualsintoclasses.Thus,the interestsarisingwithincivilsocietyareimplicitlyclassinterests. 3. Theseinterestsofclassesstandopposed.Thedegreetowhich one classachievesitsmaterialinterestmeasuresthedegreetowhich theotherfails. Classinterestsarisingwithinproductionbecomepolitical interestsinvolvedinthestruggleoverstatepower. 4. Whilethesefourpointsidentify importantaspectsofthetransitionfrom materialinteresttopoliticalaction,wecautionagainstamechanical interpretation. First,howdoclassinterestsandclassesthemselvesarisewithinthe economy? Marx‟seconomictheories providea detailedanswerto this question.As CharlesBettelheimpointsout,withinhiseconomicstudiesMarxseems to“inscribethedivisionofsocietyintoclassesentirelywithinthe relationsofproduction”(1985:19). AccordingtoMarx,acapitalisteconomyappears,onfirstglance,to consistofavastaccumulationofcommodities,asetofindividualswho ownthosecommodities,andasetof(exchange)relationsconnecting thoseindividuals.Theseindividualsdonotseethemselvesasmembers ofa class, nordotheyseetheirinterestsasclassinterests.Inordertoget fromaworldofindividualandindependentpropertyownerstoclasses weneedtoknowhowthestructureanddynamicsofthecapitalist economyleadtothegroupingofpersonsandofwants,notonlyonthe basisoftheirpersonalaffinitiesoruniquecircumstances,butonthe basisoftheirpositionwithinanobjectivestructureofproduction. 103

  24. POL 831 MODULE2 ThekeyelementofMarx‟sargumentfortheemergenceofclassesstarts byquestioning the classicaltheory‟s understanding ofthe purpose ofthe market.HereMarxiantheoryarguesthatthemarketeconomyisnotso muchamechanismformaximizingtheprivatewelfareofindividuals generallyasitisameansoffacilitatingthecapitalist‟sappropriationof surplus-valueandaccumulationofcapital.Themarketmakessenseasa socialinstitutionbecauseitmakespossibleself-aggrandizementand privateaccumulationsofwealthintheformofcapital.Wecanuseone ofMarx‟sbetterknownformulationstoclarifythisidea. TheissuesraisedbytheMarxianapproachtoclassconsciousnessand politicalinterestreferustobasicfeaturesofMarx‟smethod.This methoddirectsourattentiontothecircumstancesofpersonsin(civil) societyandfindsinthosecircumstancesboththelogicalandthe historicaloriginfortheirpoliticalagendas.Inonerespectthismethod differslittlefromtheutilitariansincebothrootpoliticsincivilsociety. Unliketheutilitarians,however,Marxistsretaintheideaofuniversal interestandmakeclaimsregardingtheuniversalityorlackthereofofthe interestsemergingwithintheprivatesphere.Becauseofthis,Marxism confrontsissuesnotwelldefinedwithintheutilitariantheories.Marxism concernsitselfwiththewaysinwhichthecircumstancesofpersons withintheprivatesphereformanddeterminetheirconsciousness,and howthedevelopmentofsocietydeterminestheprivatecircumstances andtheirassociatedwaysoflifeandways of thinking. Astheory,Marxismconcernsitselfwiththeclashbetweendiffering conceptionsofthewell-orderedsociety.Itseesthestrugglebetween capitalandlaborasastrugglebetweenfundamentallyopposed judgmentsconcerningwhatis,indeed,universaltotheaspirationsof persons.Doescapitalismexpressthefundamentalhumanaspirationto individualself-aggrandizementandpursuitofwealth?Inthissensedoes capitalismaccordwiththegeneralinterestsofsocietyaswellasthe narrowinterestsofcapitalists?Or,doesthematerialsituationofworkers imbuethem withacommunalandegalitarianethicmoreinlinewiththe universalinterestsofpersons? Bearinmind,aswepursuetheMarxianapproach,theunderlying methodologicaljudgmentconcerningwherewelookforthesourceof universalinterests–incivilsocietyandnotinpoliticsorinthestate.As oneMarxistexpressesit,civilsocietyisthe“realhome,thetheatreof history”(Bobbio,1979:31).Finally,theMarxianpoliticaleconomy promotestheideathattheproductionanddistributionofgoodsand wealtharemaintainedandregulatedbysociety,ratherthanaparticular groupofpeople.Therationalebehindthisisthatwhateverisproduced bysocietyisdonesobecauseofthosewhoparticipate,regardlessof status,wealth,orposition.Socialismaimstobridgethegapbetween 104

More Related