the politics behind study abroad l.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
The Politics Behind Study Abroad PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
The Politics Behind Study Abroad

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 39

The Politics Behind Study Abroad - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

The Politics Behind Study Abroad. Michael Rothschild PLSC 374: Dr. Wang. Abstract.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

The Politics Behind Study Abroad

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Presentation Transcript
    1. The Politics Behind Study Abroad Michael Rothschild PLSC 374: Dr. Wang

    2. Abstract Attending a school like the University of Richmond, it is apparent that many of its students study abroad, either for a summer, semester, or full year. There has not been much research conducted in the past looking at the differences (if any) among those students who sojourn to another school and those that prefer to stay at their home institution. This study analyzes the political views and activities of both students who went abroad and those that did not. It is done in a survey format that went out to 78 Richmond students, 44 of which participated in a study abroad program. The experimental and simple post-test design will help to shed light on the mindset of those students before they went abroad and after. Also, included is an elite interview with the Dean of International Education that provided some background information and thoughts about how a semester overseas may affect a student. The findings are crucial to international educators because it will allow them to better understand the views and opinions of the student body they are trying to reach. .

    3. Research Questions • Does a relationship exist between one’s political views and their propensity to study abroad? • What are the differences in political thinking of those that studied abroad and those that did not?

    4. Part I Independent Variable  One’s political views (i.e. Liberal vs. Conservative) Dependent Variable  Did that person study abroad Part II Independent Variable  Did that person study abroad Dependent Variable  2004 Presidential election, Iraq War, foreign policy goals, morals, ect…..

    5. Literature Review Background Info Albach (1970) • The history of study abroad is rooted heavily in politics • Cold War battle of ideologies Critical of US Carlson and Wideman (1988) Carlson, Burn, Useem, and Yachimowicz (1990) • Split on how returnees viewed the US

    6. Literature Review Political Views Nash (1976) • Controlled experiment • Experimental subjects significantly more liberal Austin (1989) • No significant findings that attitudes shifted upon return

    7. Literature Review Who goes abroad? Hull, Lemke, Huong (1977) • Previous research holds that demographics and field of study more important determinant • Parental achievement • Humanities and Social Sciences Dowd (2004) • Geography can signal political views

    8. Gaps to be Filled • No real info on liberal vs. conservative and going abroad • Effects of study abroad on UR students • Research is conducted after a heated election with students overseas • Many students are coming back from countries that are aggressively anti-Bush and anti-U.S.

    9. Data and Method Research Design • Experimental • Experimental Group: Study abroad students • Control: Non study abroad students • Treatment: Time spent in another country • Simple post-test • Look at affects on students who went abroad • How it changed their political views

    10. Data Collection • Analysis of aggregate data • 2004 Open Doors Report • Elite Interview • Dr. Uliana Gabara, Dean of International Education • Survey research of UR students

    11. Variables Comparatively Between Groups Political Views (Liberal vs. Conservative) US Involvement with other countries (Internationalist vs. Isolationist) Registered to vote? Party Registration Voted in 2004 election? For whom? Approve Bush’s job as President Was Iraq a mistake? Was it worth going to Iraq? Developments on the war in Iraq/Terrorism Importance of US foreign policy goals Moral Issues (Abortion and Death Penalty)

    12. Variables Within Abroad Students Before and after political views Before and after US involvement Liberalizing effect of study abroad? More or less critical of US foreign policy More or less critical of US overall

    13. Hypotheses Comparatively Between Groups • H1: Students who consider themselves liberal will be more likely to go abroad • H2: Students who consider themselves internationalists will be more likely to go abroad • H3: Students who went abroad will be more likely to be registered as a democrat • H4: Students who went abroad will be more likely to have voted for John Kerry • H5: Students who went abroad will be more likely to disapprove of the way George W. Bush is handling his job as president

    14. Hypotheses Iraq War • H6: Students who went abroad will be more likely to think going to war in Iraq was a mistake • H7: Students who went abroad will be more likely to think it was not worth going to war in Iraq Moral Issues • H8: Students who went abroad will be more likely to think abortion is morally acceptable • H9: Students who go abroad will be more likely to think the death penalty is morally wrong

    15. Hypotheses Within Abroad Students • H10: Students who went abroad will be more inclined to label themselves as more liberal after their experience • H11: Students who went abroad will be more inclined to label themselves as internationalist after their experiences • H12: Students will agree that studying abroad has a liberalizing effect on students • H13: Students will come back more critical of US foreign policy • H14: Students will come back more critical of the US overall

    16. Elite Interview with Dr. Gabara • Compared national and UR statistics • Trends • Big difference is gender • Location will have an effect on the student • Limitations and Recommendations

    17. Survey: Sample • Convenience and Quota Method • Could control for variables • Personally handed out survey • High response rate • N = 78 • 44 Abroad, 34 Non-abroad Limitations • Surveyed mainly students I knew • Friends, classmates • Males over-represented • Female Non-Abroad underrepresented • Not entirely random

    18. FINDINGS

    19. Iraq War Statistics • Study abroad students more likely to think: • Going to Iraq was a mistake (barely) • Things are going bad (moderately + very) for the US • It was not worth going

    20. Iraq Abroad vs. Non-Abroad

    21. Abortion

    22. Let’s Look at the Statistical Significance

    23. Significance Testing- Between Groups

    24. 2004 Presidential Elections Abroad Bush- 27.6% Kerry- 72.4% Non-Abroad Bush- 59.1% Kerry- 40.9% • Only variable that was statistically significant

    25. Significance Testing- Within Abroad Group

    26. Critical of US- Bivariate Analysis

    27. Testing Main Hypothesis

    28. Main Hypothesis Abroad vs. Non-Abroad Political Views • Means • Abroad  3.59 • Non-Abroad  4.12 • HOWEVER, • Statistical Significance  1.45 =FAIL TO REJECT THE NULL

    29. Summary of Findings Statistically Significant  Can reject the null for H4, H12, H13, H14 • Bush or Kerry in 2004 • Abroad students feel: • Study abroad has a liberalizing effect • More critical towards US foreign policy • More critical towards US overall Close to Statistical Significance however, fail to reject the null • Feelings on the developments in Iraq and Terrorism • Abortion • Students coming back more liberal in self assessment

    30. Limitations on Research • Sampling Issues • Too small, not completely representative, not random • Lack of resources: Time and Print Credits • Questionnaire • Some questions leading • Too long and not all questions necessary • Problems with self-reflective questions (and looking in the past) • Statistical analysis • Beginner at SPSS • Two years removed from statistics

    31. Conclusions Based on the statistical data: • There is no significant difference in the political views of those that went abroad vs. those that stayed at UR • You are more likely to vote for John Kerry if you went abroad in 2004-05 • Students who went abroad do sense a (small) liberalizing effect • Students abroad during that time frame came back more critical of the US

    32. Future Research • Should look at personality characteristics along with political views • i.e. propensity to go rock climbing and go abroad • Look at time series data from elections not as polarizing as 2004 • Do a pre- and post- test of students’ views who go abroad • Cultural effects along with political • Look more at the geographic choices and their effects • Do studies at different schools

    33. THE END Any Questions?