slide1 l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
SPI, CERISE and PROSPERA Promoting Social Performance from Practitioners’ Perspective: Advancement and next steps PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
SPI, CERISE and PROSPERA Promoting Social Performance from Practitioners’ Perspective: Advancement and next steps

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 15

SPI, CERISE and PROSPERA Promoting Social Performance from Practitioners’ Perspective: Advancement and next steps - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 345 Views
  • Uploaded on

SPI, CERISE and PROSPERA Promoting Social Performance from Practitioners’ Perspective: Advancement and next steps. SOCIAL PERFORMANCE TASK FORCE MEETING June 17-18, 2008 - Paris. CERISE and PROSPERA.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'SPI, CERISE and PROSPERA Promoting Social Performance from Practitioners’ Perspective: Advancement and next steps' - KeelyKia


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

SPI, CERISE and PROSPERAPromoting Social Performance from Practitioners’ Perspective: Advancement and next steps

SOCIAL PERFORMANCE TASK FORCE MEETING

June 17-18, 2008 - Paris

cerise and prospera
CERISE and PROSPERA
  • Cerise (1998): Network for exchanging and disseminating good practices in MF (French & International partners)
    • Topics: Governance, impact and social performance, rural and agricultural finance
  • ProsperA - PROmotion of Social PERformance, An Alliance of Practitioners: Develops the culture and practices of SP via the capacity-building of MFIs & networks on the basis of the SPI tool, governance & impact assessment
    • Members: 40 members (1/3 networks, 1/3 MFIs, 1/3 support organisations & investors)
spi social performance indicators a questionnaire to measure sp
SPI – Social Performance IndicatorsA questionnaire to measure SP
  • Principles: simplicity, internal info, standardization, external check, designed with and forMFIs
  • Contents: a questionnaire and a companion guide(available on www.cerise-microfinance.org)
  • 4 key dimensions :
      • Outreach
      • Adaptation of products
      • Social capital
      • Social responsibility
analysis decision tools for prospera
Analysis & decision tools for ProsperA

Social Ratings

(External check)

Analysis of governance

Decision making

Preparation of decision

Mission

Actions

Results

Implementation

SP assessment

Control

Impact assessment

1 Outreach

  • Adaptation of services
  • Benefits for clients
  • MFI Social Responsibility

At each stage, evaluation takes

into account the 4 key dimensions

1 the new version of spi
1 – The New Version of SPI
  • Clarification (format, definitions, examples) for easier appropriation by MFIs, networks, investors and donors
  • Total compatibility with Mix Social Indicators
  • Better balance between economical and socio-political benefits for clients (Dimension 3)
  • New issues in MF: consumer protection, cost of services, environmental responsibility
  • Version 3.0 available now in English
  • Version 3.1 with last Mix SP Indicators in September
2 spi by the mfis social strategy and exchanges with stakeholders
2 – SPI by the MFIs: social strategy and exchanges with stakeholders
  • Social strategy: clarification and wide overview
    • Board of directors : social choices discussed
          • Ex: ASC Union Albania
    • Staff, elected members : joint discussions
          • Ex: Niger with Aquadev
  • Exchanges: “common language” for better relationships
    • Clients:focus group on social issues
          • Ex: RFR members (Equador), ASHI, Proximity (Philippines)
    • Investors, donors : visibility on SP, negociations
          • Ex: Foro Lac Fr members (Latin America)
3 spi by the networks transparency and services to the members
3 – SPI by the networks: transparency and services to the members
  • Transparency: SP at national level, by peer group
    • Government : lobbying on positive role, SP agenda
          • Ex: networks of Bolivia, Ecuador, Benin
    • Peers: exchanges of practices, innovations on SP
          • Ex: RFR in Ecuador
  • Services :
    • Economies of scale (use of SPI easier, joint lessons)
          • Ex: Foro Lac Fr
    • Identification of areas of progress
          • Ex: Credit Union members (Amucss), Aquadev Niger
4 spi by the investors promoting sp with mf partners visibility
4 – SPI by the investors: promoting SP with MF partners, visibility
  • Promotion : towards the partner MFIs
    • Process of exchanges in due diligence
          • Ex: Alterfin (Belgium)
    • Joint work, discussion in governance structure
          • Ex: SIDI (France), Oikocredit (Netherlands)
  • Visibility: towards the investor “clients”
    • Reporting, SPI summaries by MFIs
          • Ex: Oikocredit
    • Discussion on choices of indicators
          • Ex: Incofin
5 spi and poverty assessment tools strengthening poverty outreach
5 – SPI and Poverty assessment tools: strengthening poverty outreach
  • Poverty assessment, to verify the results of SPI Dimension 1 on Outreach
    • PPI or PAT for MFIs with poverty outreach
          • Ex: ASC Union Albania (SPI & PAT)
    • Assessment of levels of exclusion, or rural outreach
          • Ex: ADIE France (SPI & index of exclusion)
  • SPI & PPI / PAT as a complete assessment of poverty outreach => links to be strengthened
6 spi and impact
6 – SPI and Impact
  • Research: Verify the links between processes and results
        • Ex: Finrural Bolivia (SPI, impact studies, satisfaction surveys) => validity in particular for Dim 2 and Dim 3
  • Methodology: Simple, Specific and Operational impact analysis
        • Ex: Sanduk Comoros, Crédit Rural de Guinée
7 spi and governance towards improving the practices
7 – SPI and governance: towards improving the practices

Starting point: Identification of points to be improved and actors to be involved in the process

Steps:

Definition, clarification of the objectives in the sub-dimension, decision-making process, information available, capacities of the actors involved, process of control

the next steps
The next steps
  • Note 1
  • Note 2
  • Staying in touch >

www.cerise-microfinance.org

6 spi and governance towards improving the practices
6 – SPI and governance: towards improving the practices
  • For MFIs to build and reinforce a common vision of stakeholders on MFI mission and SP
  • For Regulators to have a better comprehension MFIs reallity