using contractors a not so modern dilemma l.
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Using Contractors: A Not So Modern Dilemma

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 24

Using Contractors: A Not So Modern Dilemma - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Using Contractors: A Not So Modern Dilemma. Heritage Group Safety. OUTLINE. Where did all this contractor liability come from? The importance of pre-qualifying contractors. What does OSHA think. The BIG liability question $$$$$$. . Where did it come from?.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Using Contractors: A Not So Modern Dilemma' - Jims

Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
  • Where did all this contractor liability come from?
  • The importance of pre-qualifying contractors.
  • What does OSHA think.
  • The BIG liability question $$$$$$.
where did it come from
Where did it come from?
  • Several incidents in the late 80’s and early 90’s led to the OSHA Process Safety Standard.
  • Pasadena, TX- ‘89-23 dead, 132 injured-explosion.
  • Cincinnati, OH-’90- 2dead-explosion.
where did it come from4
Where did it come from?
  • Sterlington, LA-’91-8 dead, 128 injuries-chemical release.
  • The OSHA Process Safety Standard specifically targeted contractors because contractors were the cause of all these catastrophes.
  • PSM applied to Contractors performing maintenance, repair, turnaround, major renovation and specialty work.
contractor liability
Contractor Liability

OSHA, later, applied this contractor liability into the

construction industry through Program Directives and

Standard Interpretations on Multi-Employer work sites.

There is no “standard” on contractor liability.

However, you can be cited and fined for Contractor

Violations if you are an Owner (Controlling Employer),

Creating Employer, Exposing Employer or Correcting


More importantly, as an owner or controlling contractor

you can be held financially liable for injuries to third parties.

pre qualifying contractors
Pre-Qualifying Contractors
  • Owners-Controlling Contractors can be held financially liable for injuries and deaths to third parties, third parties can damage your site or injure your employees and you can be fined by OSHA for their violations.
  • Pre-Qualifying Contractors is a MUST!
what does osha think
What does OSHA think?
  • Under the OSHA Multi-Employer Citation Policy both construction and non-construction citations shall be issued to employers whose employees are exposed to hazards. (exposing employer)
  • Additionally, the following employers shall be cited, whether or not their own employees are exposed:

The employer who actually creates the hazard (the

creating employer).

The employer who is responsible, by contract or actual

practice, for safety and health conditions on the worksite.

The employer who has the authority for ensuring that the

hazardous conditions are corrected (the controlling employer).

The employer who has the responsibility for actually

correcting the hazard (the correcting employer)

multi employer worksites
  • Who is responsible?
  • Who created the hazard?
  • Who is exposed to the hazard.
  • Who is ultimately responsible?
the exposing employer
The EXPOSING Employer
  • On Multi-Employer worksites, citations normally will be issued to employer whose employees are exposed to the hazard.
  • Examples.
others normally cited whether or not employees are exposed
Others Normally Cited(Whether or not employees are exposed)
  • The Creating Employer.
  • The Controlling Employer.
  • The Correcting Employer.
prior to citation issue does employer have a legitimate defense
Prior To Citation Issue-Does Employer Have A Legitimate Defense?
  • Employer did not create the hazard.
  • Employer did not have responsibility or authority to correct the hazard.
  • Can demonstrate that all employees are notified of the hazard.
the employer has instructed employees to recognize hazard and
The Employer has instructed employees to recognize hazard, and,
  • Exposing Employer has taken means to protect employees from hazard.
  • Has removed employees from job to avoid citation. (In extreme circumstances)
if exposing employer meets these defenses
If Exposing Employer Meets These Defenses:
  • Then That Employer Shall Not Be Cited.
  • If All Employers With Exposed Employees Meets These Defenses, Then Only Creating And Controlling Employers Shall Be Cited.
in such circumstances the controlling employer and the hazard creating employer
In Such Circumstances, The Controlling Employer and the Hazard Creating Employer:
  • Shall be cited even though none of their employees are exposed to the Hazard.
  • Penalties are appropriately calculated, using the exposed employees of all employers as the number of employees for probability assessment.

Cawley’s Tater Flake Company hired Hightone Paints,

to do repair and painting. During the repair work,

Hightone removed a railing near a walkway, exposing

Hightone employees, Cawley’s Tater Flake employees

and customers to a 7 foot drop. Cawley’s Tater Flake

put up a sign, warning the customers of the hazard.

Who should be cited for the missing rail????


Both Hightone Paints and Cawley’s Tater Flake Co.

Receive Citations:

Cawley’s Tater Flakes is the exposing employer.

Hightone also has employees exposed.

The warning sign is not sufficient to meet a legitimate



Ma/Pa Inc., contracted with Bumstead Plumbing

to repair sewer pipes on their property. The contract

stated that Bumstead Plumbing was responsible for

all safety and health conditions related to the sewer

job. Bumstead Plumbing dug a trench and did not

provide protection against cave-ins for three of their

employees working in the trench.

Which Company(ies) receives the citation?


Bumstead receives the citation. Bumstead is the

exposing employer.

Since Ma/Pa had no employees exposed, did not

create the hazard, was not responsible for the safety

and health conditions related to the trench and did

not have responsibility for correction, they would

probably not receive a citation.


Host operates a factory. It contracts with

Walton’s Service Co. to service. Host fails

to cover drums of a chemical after repeated

requests to do so. This results in airborne

concentrations of the chemical that exceed the

Permissible Exposure Level (PEL).

Which company receive the citation(s)?


Host is the creating employer because it caused Walton’s

employees to be exposed to the air contaminant above the PEL.

Host failed to implement measures to prevent the accumulative air contaminant.


Cornhusker Inc. hired Dingy Tank Co. to clean two of their storage tanks. In the contract, Cornhusker Inc. maintains

responsibility for the safety and health conditions of the workplace. During the cleaning operations, three Dingy

employees are in the tank. Cornhusker has no confined space


Which company(ies) receive the citation(s)???


Who is the exposing employer?

Who is the controlling employer?

Who has the responsibility for safety?

Dingy Tank is the exposing employer.

Cornhusker is the controlling employer.

Both Dingy Tank and Cornhusker has responsibility to

maintain safety and correct deficiencies.

Therefore, both companies receive citations.