slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Cultural Theory and Grid/Group Analysis PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Cultural Theory and Grid/Group Analysis

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 30

Cultural Theory and Grid/Group Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 287 Views
  • Uploaded on

Cultural Theory and Grid/Group Analysis.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Cultural Theory and Grid/Group Analysis' - Jims


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

Cultural Theory and Grid/Group Analysis

“We are interested in how individuals confer meaning upon situations, events, objects, relationships--in short, their lives. How do people come to believe that physical nature is one way rather than another? How does one view of human nature come to seem more sensible than others? ... [We explore] the different perceptual screens through which people interpret or make sense of their world and the social relations that make particular visions of reality seem more or less plausible.”

the rationale for grid group
The Rationale for Grid/Group
  • The framework is based on the idea (from Durkheim) of constraint. The question is to what extent do different social forms constrain person’s in terms of group membership and patterns of social relations.
  • Group is the extent to which an individual is incorporated into bounded limits; "grid refer to the degree to which an individual's life is circumscribed by externally imposed prescriptions, the less of life that is open to individual negotiation."
  • Furthermore, patterns of constraint, in terms of grid and group, will match the ways that persons construe their world, their ideas about physical nature, human nature, economic resources, blame, scarcity and risk. These constructions constitute cultural biases

.

slide4

Low

High

Fatalist

Hierarchist

High

Examples:

The Military, The Corporate World, The Catholic Church, Sports Teams

Politics: Conservative

Examples:

The Elderly, Peasants, The Poor.

Politics: Non-Voters

Hermit

Indivdualist

Egalitarian

Examples:

Wall Street Traders, Neoliberals, College Students

Politics: Libertarian

Examples:

Communal Groups, Political Activists

Politics: Liberal/Progressive

Low

slide5

Heroes

The Bureaucrat

(Hierarchist)

The Pioneer(Individualist)

The Holy Man(Egalitarian)

slide14

The world is random, capricious, and erratic

The world is bountiful but accountable within limits. The world is forgiving, but extreme events could disrupt it.

Hermit

Nature is resilient

The world is terribly unforgiving, any jolt could destroy it

The world is wonderfully forgiving and little that humans do could affect it.

slide16

Cultural theory-based Interpretation of Climate Change:

  • The Hierarchist’s Story (nature perverse/tolerant): International protocols and national commitments are needed to address the tragedy of the atmospheric commons and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
  • The Egalitarian’s Story (nature ephemeral): The underlying problem is consumption (resource throughput). Precaution, lifestyle simplicity and grass roots action are the most effective responses.
  • The Individualist’s Story (nature benign): To address climate change, rely on laissez-faire markets to spur competition and innovation. The benefits of climate change may even balance out the costs.
  • The Fatalist’s Story (nature capricious): Natural forces are beyond human understanding, much less human influence.
  • The Hermit’s Story (nature resilient): transcends and includes each of the others.
slide17

The Social Construction of Human Nature

FatalistHuman nature is unpredictable; some people may be benevolent, but more are hostile

HierarchistsHuman beings are born sinful but can be redeemed by good institutions

Hermit

Believes in the goodness of human nature, but recognized evil by attributing it to ignorance

IndividualistFor individualists human nature is stable; human beings regardless, are always the same, self-seeking

EgalitariansHuman beings are born good, but are corrupted by evil institutions

the social construction of needs and resources
The Social Construction of Needs and Resources

In terms of needs and resources, there are four possibilities:

  • 1. You can manage neither your needs or your resources.
  • 2. You can manage your needs but not your resources.
  • 3. You can manage your resources but not your needs.
  • 4. You can mange both your resources and your needs.
slide19

Management of Resources

FatalistManage neither needs nor resources. The strategy is to cope within an environment within which one has no control

HierarchistNeeds are fixed and resources manageable. If you can't adjust your needs, increase your resources. This requires resource mobilization.

HermitNeeds and resources are manageable

EgalitarianResources are fixed, and so you reduce your needs. Nature is so precarious that inequality in the distribution of resources will bring calamity

IndividualistManages needs and resources. Nature is a cornucopia and is manageable by skill.

slide20

These five strategies for making ends meet are the only ones that contain views of economizing congruent with the models of nature that serve to justify the corresponding ways of life.

Should egalitarians seek to expand resources they could not justify sharing out.

Should hierarchists attempt to decrease needs, they could not maintain the differentials required to support graded statuses. And so it goes.

Supporters of each way of life construct their ends to make their cultural biases meet up with their preferred pattern of social relations. Their strategies do what is important to them--uphold their way of life.

(Thompson, Michael, Richard Ellis, and Aaron Wildavsky, 1990. Culture Theory p.48).

slide21

The Social Construction of Blame

FatalistsBlame fate

Hierarchists Can't blame the system, that would be self-destructive. Instead, hierarchies are "blame-shedding machines. Investigations are quashed or forbidden; blame is shifted to deviants

HermitLay no blame since they are uninvolved in social struggles.

Individualists Blame bad luck or personal incompetence

EgalitariansThey reject authority; it is the system that is to blame

slide23

The Social Construction of Risk

FatalistsDo not knowingly take risks. They would only get hurt and there is little prospect of reward

HierarchistsAccepts risk as long as decisions are made by experts

HermitEager acceptance of myopically perceived risk. They are attached to him and can’t be transferred

EgalitariansBy accentuating the risks of technological development and economic growth, egalitarians are able to shore up their way of life and discomfort rival ways. predictions of imminent catastrophic- helps convince themselves anew that it is safer inside than outside the egalitarian group.

IndividualistsRisk is opportunity. With no risk, there would be no opportunity of personal reward

slide24

Each way of life needs each of its rivals either to make up for its deficiencies or to exploit or define itself against. Were egalitarians to eliminate hierarchists and individualists, for instance, their lack of a target to be against would remove justification foor their strong group boundaries and thus undermine their way of life. Or, to take another example, were indiidalists ever to rid the world of hierarchy, there would be no extra-market authority to enforce the laws of contract, thus producing the breakdown of the individualists' way of life.

--Thompson et al 1990: 3-4)

slide26

The 12 Possible Changes

Fatalist

Big man to Rubbish Man

Hierarchist

Informal group of organization gets formal

Individualist

Egalitarian

Becoming the charismatic leader of a sect, the CEO in retirement becomes prominent in activitst groups

slide27

The 12 Possible Changes

Individualist

Typical rags to riches story

Hierarchist

No-hoper who joins the military and “finds himself.”

Fatalist

Egalitarian

Recruited by some tight group as someone they are seeking.

slide28

The 12 Possible Changes

Fatalist

Fall from grace, debarred or defrocked

Individualist

The civil servant who sets him/herself up as a consultant

Hierarchist

Egalitarian

Loyalist to heretic, the whistleblower

slide29

The 12 Possible Changes

Fatalist

The person rudely expellled from the group who doesn’t land “on his feet.”.

Egalitarian

Hierarchist

“routinization of charisma, co-opted rebel

Individualist

Someone expelled from the group who lands “on his feet.”

slide30

Exercises

  • Write a story or narratives that characterizes each way of life.
  • 2. Match specific forms of music or specific songs to each way of life.
  • 3. What are some of the characteristic metaphors or frames for each way of life?