200 likes | 546 Views
Reconfiguring Environmental Regulation: The Future Policy Agenda. Neil Gunningham Regulatory Institutions Network Australian National University. Reconfiguring Regulation. Overview of the regulatory landscape Frameworks for understanding regulatory reconfiguration
E N D
Reconfiguring Environmental Regulation: The Future Policy Agenda Neil Gunningham Regulatory Institutions Network Australian National University
Reconfiguring Regulation • Overview of the regulatory landscape • Frameworks for understanding regulatory reconfiguration • Role of ‘Smart Regulation” and regulatory pluralism • Policy Implications
The shifting regulatory landscape • First generation problems reduced but second generation far more challenging • The contracting state • Increasing power and sophistication of NGOs • Increasing interest of commercial third parties in environmental issues • The changing roles of business
Diverse ‘second generation’ instruments emerge • Reinventing Environmental Regulation (USA) • Negotiated Agreements (Western Europe) • Informational Regulation (eg Indonesia) • Industry self-regulation and self-management
Reconfiguring regulation: four frameworks • Reflexive and meta-regulation • Civil regulation and participatory governance • Regulatory pluralism • Explaining corporate environmental behavior: the license perspective
The role of Meta Regulation • Recognises the limitations of the state to deal with complex environmental issues • Focus on procedures rather than prescribing behaviour • State shifts to meta-regulation and meta-risk management - Government monitoring of self-monitoring, or the regulation of self-regulation - To monitor and seek to re-make the risk management systems of regulatees • Enforcement means refusing accreditation
Continual Improvement Commitment & Policy Review and Improvement Planning Implementation Measurement & Evaluation Environmental Management System Model
Civil regulation and participatory governance • organisations of civil society set standards for business behaviour • Mechanisms include direct action, consumer boycotts, certification programs, partnerships • State role to empower civil society
Regulatory Pluralism and Smart Regulation: The issue • Market failure/government failure • A diversity of “next generation” instruments, but how do we select between them? • One size does not fit all: eg size and sector matter
Smart Regulation • Solutions require: • broader range of strategies, • tailored to broader range of motivations, • harnessing broader range of social actors • Recognises roles of ISO, supply-chain pressure, commercial institutions,financial markets, peer and NGO pressure • ‘steering not rowing”: harnessing capacities of markets,civil society and other institutions
1. Design comprehensive policy mixes - build on strengths and compensate for weaknesses of individual instruments - build on advantages of engaging broader range of parties But note - practical limits/regulatory overload - limited public resources - not all combinations are complementary
Optimal Mixes Involve • matching tools with particular problem • with the parties best capable of implementing them • with each other
Examples • Environmental Improvement Plans • Beyond Compliance: Two Track Regulation • Institute of Nuclear Power Operations • Car Body Shops • Regulating Horticulture
Number of Organisations Fast Follower Team Player Compliance Seeker Polluter Key Player Leader
Higher Courts Incapacitation Fines and other punitive action Breach of Trust Two Track Partnership
H Coercion Third Parties L Government Business
The ‘license model’ • Views businesses as constrained by a multi-faceted ‘licence to operate’ • Corporate behaviour explained by interactions between regulatory, social and economic licences - Efficiency and effectiveness of technology based command and control • The importance of Social Licence: underpinned by Informational regulation, and empowering NGOs and communities • Management style as the perceptual filter through which management interprets its license conditions
Different frameworks invoke different policy prescriptions • Strengthen internal reflection and self-control (reflexive regulation) • Introduce a plethora of instruments that and allow the state to steer not row (regulatory pluralism) • Empower the institutions of civil society to make corporations more accountable (civil regulation) • Exploit points of leverage provided by different strands of firms licence to operate (licence model)
Different frameworks are appropriate to different contexts • Large reputation sensitive companies vs SMEs • Integrated catchment management • Major Hazard Facilities • Diffuse source pollution • Pulp mills
The future? • The contracting state – contracts vs criminal law (Sust Covenants) • Corporate shaming (informational regulation) • Economic instruments and market signals (Load Based Licenses) • Processes and systems – ‘locking in continuous improvement’ (Meta Regulation, EIPs , Regulatory Flexibility) • Harnessing second and third parties as surrogate enforcers • The role of Government- steering not rowing? • Traditional enforcement