1 / 17

Boating Infrastructure Needs in Texas: The BIG Report

Boating Infrastructure Needs in Texas: The BIG Report Robert B. Ditton & Fannie Chang in cooperation with Dewayne Hollin Texas A&M University Purpose BIG Research Program: To help state agency officials develop a meaningful plan to provide better access to boaters

Jimmy
Download Presentation

Boating Infrastructure Needs in Texas: The BIG Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Boating Infrastructure Needs in Texas: The BIG Report Robert B. Ditton & Fannie Chang in cooperation with Dewayne Hollin Texas A&M University

  2. Purpose • BIG Research Program: To help state agency officials develop a meaningful plan to provide better access to boaters • Sport Fishing and Boating Safety Act of 1998: A concern for meeting the infrastructure needs of boaters with non-trailerable boats 26 feet and over

  3. Figure 2. Residence Distribution of All Persons Owning TPWD-Registered Boats 26 Feet and Over in Length

  4. Figure 4. Residence Distribution of All Persons Owning TPWD-Registered Boats Under 26 Feet

  5. Figure 5. Spatial Distribution of All Marinas

  6. Approach • Spring 2002 • Telephone survey of random sample of 700 boat owners: 350 of boats 26 feet and over, 350 of boats under 26 feet. • Telephone survey of 221 of 324 marina operators or representatives; asked if they provide access facilities for boats 26 feet and over, under 26 feet, or both

  7. Questions for Boat Owners • Description of boat used most often • Boating activities and preferences • Preferences for facility needs • Constraints to boating participation

  8. Questions for Marina Operators • Marina characteristics in terms of facilities • The need for changes at their facilities • Description of boater market

  9. Results: Boat Owners (26Ft and Over) • Average boat length = 30 feet • Most were sailboats (28%) and cabin cruisers (gasoline) (25%) • 48% reported the # of transient tie-ups was “about right”; 25% wanted a “lot more” • Tie-ups were needed: Lake Texoma, Galveston Bay, Lake Travis, Clear Lake, and Port Aransas.

  10. Results: Boat Owners (< 26Ft) • Average boat length = 16 feet • Most were bass boats (28%) and open motor boats (24%) • 57% reported the # of access sites was“about right”; 23% wanted a “few more” • More boat access sites needed: Lake Ray Roberts, Lake Ray Hubbard, Galveston Bay, Lake Travis, Lake Livingston, and Canyon Lake.

  11. Results: Marina Operators • 124 of 144 marinas have transient slips with an average of 31/ facility • 60% have less than 15 TS; another 31% have 15- 50. • Most (>50%) rated their facility conditions as “good” or “excellent” • Most (53%) operators were satisfied with the number of transient tie-up facilities; the remaining 47% were not

  12. Discussion Points • Useful to look at boating demand and supply relationships in light of demographic change • Boating is expected to grow more slowly from 1998- 2030; declining rate of participation • Increased demand for facilities in metropolitan areas

  13. Discussion Points • Transient boat issue: Most boaters “used their boat where it is kept!” • We gained little insight to transient boaters and their behavior and needs • Mandated methodology left much to be desired • There are few data available re: boating in support public policy making

  14. http://lutra.tamu.edu/hdlab/ Downloads

  15. Figure 1. Residence Distribution of 350 Respondents with TPWD-Registered Boats 26 Feet and Over in Length

  16. Figure 3. Residence Distribution of 350 Respondents with TPWD-Registered Boats Under 26 Feet

  17. Figure 6. Spatial Distribution of 221 Responded Marinas

More Related