1 / 17

M odelling A dvice and S upport S ervices to I ntegrate the V irtual component in H igher E ducation Isabel Pérez

M odelling A dvice and S upport S ervices to I ntegrate the V irtual component in H igher E ducation Isabel Pérez , Universidad de Granada Introduction Basis and objectives of the project The anticipated results and development of the project The MASSIVE peer review model

JasminFlorian
Download Presentation

M odelling A dvice and S upport S ervices to I ntegrate the V irtual component in H igher E ducation Isabel Pérez

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Modelling Advice and Support Servicesto Integratethe Virtual componentin Higher Education Isabel Pérez, Universidad de Granada

  2. Introduction • Basis and objectives of the project • The anticipated results and development of the project • The MASSIVE peer review model • Intermediate conclusions

  3. Iniciatives • The Lisbon Strategy an eLearning in Higher Education • The Bologna process and the promotion of quality • Integration of ICT in European Universities not homogenous

  4. Progress in eLearning • In most universities the result has been a transference of traditional pedagogy into the computer environment • Only a minor number of universities use ICT to design programmes based on a new methodology

  5. University strategies to integrate virtual components Virtual Campus Evolution of University Libraries IPR Management Training and teachers’ support Students’ support Design of online courses 6 Areas

  6. Project Partners • UNIVERSIDAD DE GRANADA (ES)– PROJECT COORDINATOR • UNIVERSIDAD DE BARCELONA (ES) • FIM NEW LEARNING (DE) • BUDAPEST MÜSZAKI GAZDASÁGTUDOMÁNYI EGYETM (HU) • UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN (NO) • MALTS - UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH (UK) • EUROPACE (BE) • SCIENTER ESPAÑA (ES) • SCIENTER (IT) • SOCIEDAD DIGITAL DE AUTORES Y EDITORES, SGAE (ES) • TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE (UK)

  7. MASSIVE Approach • Objetive: to design a model of mutual support services for European traditional Universities to successfully implement the virtual component of teaching • Strategy: “peer review”

  8. Anticipated Results • Desk research reports in the 6 areas proposed. • Criteria and toolsto identify good practices. • Comparative report on strategies, services and transferable elements • Peer review methodologyto assess the implementation of eLearning

  9. Peer Review • Widely used to introduce new techniques and to improve the educational offer by integrating correctives among colleagues • It allows the involved institutions to take part in a dialogue between both sides as colleagues do • The institution goes through a process of reflection upon their weaknesses and strengths

  10. Peer Review • Collaborative:improving relations between peers • Open:sharing the results without any restrictive or secret statements • Multidimensional y triangular:incorporating a set of data using a wide range of sources • Ethical:it does not endanger the relations between the institution and their students • Formative:it implies an element of continuous improvement process

  11. Development and results • Researchin depth of the 6 areas • Recommendations to develop the case of studies • Methodological handbookas a supporting tool to implement the peer review process

  12. Peer review process

  13. Peer review process • Assessing the services and models of the universities taking part in the pilot. Non-commercial consultancy service proposed:

  14. Pilot Experiences Aim • To provide a methodological framework for the developed tools, as a non-commercial service that allows the comparison of the integration of ICT in the 6 proposed areas

  15. Peer Review Process • Documents and data collection: • Documents, files, reports, etc. • Interviews (face to face, telephone, focus group, etc.) • Observation (users, platforms, etc.) • Peer review team: • Work package leader • 2 visiting partners • 1 host partner

  16. Partial conclusions • Essential topic: University strategies to integrate ICT in education • Intellectual property rights are related to the areas of University Libraries and Design of online courses • The indicators identified in the area of IPR not very clear • The areas of Training and teachers’ support and Students’ support are closely related • The need of flexibility in applying methodology & tools

  17. http://www.massive-project.org/

More Related