1 / 17

Themes for Profit Maximization

Themes for Profit Maximization Pro sports teams, like most firms, have some degree of market power market power < = > ability to control price for pricing decisions, use "monopoly" model market power is enhanced by entry restrictions of leagues

JasminFlorian
Download Presentation

Themes for Profit Maximization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Themes for Profit Maximization • Pro sports teams, like most firms, have some degree of market power • market power < = > ability to control price • for pricing decisions, use "monopoly" model • market power is enhanced by entry restrictions of leagues • What was impact of Alex Rodriguez on ticket prices for Texas Ranger games? • Philadelphia Flyers (hockey) always sell out • Phillies (baseball, same town) seldom do • Is someone screwing up?

  2. Maximizing Profit • How do we define profit? • p= TR-TC • TC includes Opportunity Cost • Why did the Dodgers leave Brooklyn? • Were highly profitable, but ... • O’Malley perceived greater profit in LA

  3. Where are profits maximized? • Where MR = MC • Demand & Marginal Revenue • TR = P*Q • P is average revenue (TR/Q) • MR = ΔTR/ΔQ • incremental revenue per unit of incremental sales • Since D slopes down, MR < P at every Q

  4. P = A - bQ TR = PQ = AQ - bQ2 MR = ΔTR/ΔQ = A - 2bQ "The MR Rule" MR has same intercept as demand & twice the slope Ex: P = 100 - .01Q MR = 100 - .02Q MR with Linear Demand $100 D 5000 10,000 MR

  5. Optimal Ticket Prices • Optimal, from the seller's point of view • What – literally – are teams selling? • Tickets – the right to sit for 2-3 hours • The cost of selling 1 more ticket is very low ~$0 • At least up to capacity • What kind of cost is Jaromir Jagr’s salary? • Hint: What does he cost if 1 million attend? • What does he cost if 1 thousand attend?

  6. Assume no capacity constraint Let MC = 0 for simplicity (rather than 25 cents) Optimum: where MR = MC = 0 MR = 100 - 0.2Q = 0 Q* = 100 / .02 = 5000 P* = 100 - .01(5000) = $50 The Profit Max Price is $50 Profit Max Ticket Prices $100 P*=$50 D MR Q*=5000

  7. A Paradox – and a Solution • Signing Jagr in 2001 imposed a fixed cost on Washington Caps • Fixed Costs do not affect MR=MC • But teams claim ticket prices go up because of higher talent costs • When Caps signed Jagr, ticket prices jumped • Does this refute the profit max model of ticket prices? • No. Fans' WTP for games increases with more talented players • Demand (& MR) shifted out

  8. Another Paradox • Do Phillies charge too much? • Do the Flyers charge too little? • Some basic assumptions • Both teams exercise market power • Demand is same for both teams • MC ~= $0 • Capacity of stadiums is only difference

  9. Phillies' Pricing Strategy • Why does MC look like this? • --Stadium Capacity ~ 60,000 • Does it pay for the Phillies to sell out? • They couldn't do it if they gave tickets away for free! $ MC $20 D MR

  10. How About the Flyers? • Arena capacity ~17,000 • --What does this mean for their MC curve? • Does it pay for the Flyers to sell out? • What does this mean for prices? • Phillies vs. Flyers P MC D MR

  11. More Sophisticated Pricing:Price Discrimination • Consumer Surplus • Different individual values, but each pays P • Also applies to 1 buyer • MV declines w/ Q • Can seller can charge different P? • Ideal: P = MV each unit • When is this possible? P P0 D Q

  12. Forms of Price Discrimination • Successful Price Discrimination requires: • 1. market power (obvious) • 2. information • Must know differences in MV across consumers, Q • 3. separation • Must keep high MV consumers from buying at lower P • First degree price discrimination: • know WTP of all consumers for all Q • Second degree • know demand curve slopes down • Third degree • know different groups behave different demand elasticities

  13. First Degree Price Discrimination • Know what everyone is willing to pay • Can charge everyone a different price • Seller captures all consumer surplus • P = MV for each unit • More efficient • P=MC for last unit • No DWL • Hard to do in practice $ MC D MR Q QM Q*

  14. 2nd Degree Price Discrimination P • Don’t know WTP for everyone • Do know demand slopes down • Charge less for additional tickets • Captures some consumer surplus • What happens at right? • Group sales/season tickets $25 $20 $15 D 1 4 8 # Games

  15. Third Degree Price Discrimination $/Q • Can separate groups • Here, group #2 WTP more than group #1 • If can keep markets separate, profit max P2 > P1 • What if charges a single price? P2 D2 P1 MC Q2 Q1 D1 MR1 MR2

  16. Personal Seat Licenses • New innovation in pro sports • First used in pros by Carolina Panthers • Long history of similar payments in colleges • booster contributions for choice seats • PSL: payment for right to buy season tickets • Similar to golf course membership: pay for right to play • A puzzle to economists: where is gain from PSLs? • If pay for $$$$ PSL, will pay less for ticket

  17. Key to PSLs: Consumer Surplus $/Q • Charge competitive price for tickets • Not monopoly price • Walker Course Membership • Fan is WTP for opportunity to buy tix • With PSL: • Team gets ABC • Not just B A PM B D C PC Q MR

More Related